Cool, lets associate transgendered people with child molesters, that's a great look.

What does this have to do with child molestation?

This Infant Might Be The First Baby In The World With An Official Genderless ID Card

https://www.buzzfeed.com/briannasack...A14#.iwA29gdVM

My point was, transitioning children is abuse.

JiggyMinder

Wont somebody please think of the children?!


Meanwhile, lets trow our support behind sabotaging ACA, denying climate change, etc, etc...

And close planed parenthood increasing abortion.

(Content removed. I'm going to say that incoherent accusations of genocide against your political opponents is too much even for this forum. Don't do that. -- wn)

Isn't that the go to?

batair: sorry to delete your post but since I edited jiggy's it just seemed like the best plan. Perhaps jiggy can discuss planned parenthood without accusing people of ethnic genocide.

What citation? You mean about how it's more important for leftist to defend their distorted ideology than protect their children?

That's a pretty well known trope on the right though. Abortion is secretly a way that Democrats are keeping down the black population and therefore black people should be against abortion. I mean it's pretty incoherent, but no more incoherent than Democrats keep blacks on a virtual plantation of welfare or the KKK is Democrat.

Why does there have to be this game? It's obvious I asked for a citation to back up your claim that TG using bathrooms is a risk to children.

Bet im friendly with more trump supporters in real life then you...

You mean I shouldn't talk about a eugenicists positions on eugenics?

http://time.com/4081760/margaret-san...tory-eugenics/

"An advocate for women’s reproductive rights who was also a vocal eugenics enthusiast, Margaret Sanger leaves a complicated legacy — and one that conservatives have periodically leveraged into sweeping attacks on the organization she helped found: Planned Parenthood."

"“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population"


" She did, and very publicly. In a 1921 article, she wrote that, “the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”

I'm making some kind of a face right now. Meh, well, I'm not saying this isn't a debatable judgement call but it's too much for me right now. There's plenty of scope for an argument about planned parenthood without this weird racial genocide angle. So just no. :P

And I have more liberal friends than you? (I wouldn't say Leftist, they're just wackadoodle).

Unlikely if i had to guess.

I'm well aware of the usual derpy arguments about Sanger, which have basically zero relevance to Planned Parenthood funding in 2017.

I know you Leftists are good at repeating lies until they're true - but that information can no longer be hidden from your past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1924_D...nal_Convention

No, at this point, Conservatives are just anti-baby murder in general. And really they're just anti-government paying for baby murder. The derp is on the side of excusing and defending her though. Oh, it was just "inartful" language. Like when has any Leftist given a conservative a pass for "inartful" language? Hell, Bill Maher wasn't even inartful (unless you think he's a real racist).

I'm glad you consider that history has little bearing on the present however. Although it seems like Leftists still can't let go of their racist past.

There is no faux-tough guy act here. I do not wish to get into a fight with a man with a dress on, at all. I'm simply telling you what would happen and if I actually thought someone was truly threatening or hurting my kid there would be no faux anything, I assure you of that.
Humans with penises shouldn't be in my daughters bathroom, period. I don't care if it's a 9 year old boy, you, or RuPaul. The woman's bathroom is for women. That's it, end of story, end of discussion. I don't understand why you can't get this through your fee-fees. I'm never changing my opinion. Sorry.

That's obviously not true. I do, however, you and people like you are an actual detriment to society and to my family members if you got your way. I believe that 100% and that's why I speak out against it, and I will most likely continue to do so for the rest of my life.

Call me old or outdated or whatever. It means nothing to me. Your idiot methods don't work on me. I care about my family and my children, and you trying to shame me for it strengthens my resolve. Don't tell me what the **** I need to believe in or what I need to accept when it comes to my children. You raise your children however the **** your sick, twisted mind wants to, and give yourself a big pat on the back for being so "progressive". I'm not interested in being labelled something, I'm interested in doing my job and taking care of my family.

Who did David Duke, KKK support? JiggyCuc moving on from re-litigating the 2016 election to re-litigating the 1920s?

Bump.

Accusations of murder which aren't viable are sometimes referenced as false.

I have never considered racism to be only a partisan problem. Racism is an American problem that, for basically our entire history, has been bipartisan. There is no doubt, however, about which major political party in the present is more interested in exploiting white racial grievances. The party realignment in the south was clearly driven in large part by the civil rights movement beginning with Truman.