President Trump
07-20-2017
, 03:31 AM
07-20-2017
, 09:38 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:16 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:17 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:20 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:24 AM
Laura Silsby, Child trafficking, and the Death of Monica Peterson:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...ignorecover-it
What standard shall we use? The "Trump is colluding with Russia because he spoke with Putin in front of journalists at a G20 dinner"?
Even Snopes has this as "Unproven" - http://www.snopes.com/monica-petersen-killed/ and the article is less than a page. Probably worried about their own thoughts of suicide.
How many people around the Clintons have to end up dead before you think.....hrmmmmm, maybe there's something here?
Last edited by JiggyMac; 07-20-2017 at 10:29 AM.
07-20-2017
, 10:25 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:26 AM
Quote:
And I think it has been totally abused and there was a hysteria where local law enforcement thought it was a good idea and then the states had to back the **** up. It's a pendulum.
And I'm not anti-Police (obviously
), but I do want law enforcement to stay out of our lives as much as they possibly can.
And I'm not anti-Police (obviously
), but I do want law enforcement to stay out of our lives as much as they possibly can.
Quote:
Yeah, I think I'm against this. Sessions is being a overzealous here. I don't like it being sold as funding mechanism for law enforcement. I do approve of forfeited assets going to victim compensation - after due process.
I think this and Sessions Marijuana stance may have Trump looking for a new AG sooner rather than later. Although Sessions was awfully loyal to Trump during the campaign. We'll see.
I think this and Sessions Marijuana stance may have Trump looking for a new AG sooner rather than later. Although Sessions was awfully loyal to Trump during the campaign. We'll see.
07-20-2017
, 10:28 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:37 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:40 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:45 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:47 AM
Quote:
all these scandals around people who trump fired and made up scandals involving his son, none mind you involving Trump himself.
while people investigating Hillary's scandals quickly develop depression and kill themselves, or have accidents like dropping barbells on themselves.
Keep pushing these things, Trump looks better in comparison everyday.
while people investigating Hillary's scandals quickly develop depression and kill themselves, or have accidents like dropping barbells on themselves.
Keep pushing these things, Trump looks better in comparison everyday.
Quote:
Either they're both crooks or the both not crooks. Whichever the outcome, the conclusion is the same.
And...Congress does have the power to impose penalties on those who come before it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress
That said, interesting factoid - do you know who the only three people to have been held in contempt of Congress without complying are:
............time's up.
Lois Lerner
Eric Holder
And Hillary's IT Staffer Bryan Pagliano
Everyone else complied with Congress, even if it meant jail time. Note as well that the numbers are split about 50/50 Republican/Democrat.
I know you're going to say I'm using a "but Obama", but since it's coming up, I find it fascinating.
Makes the Susan Rice v Manafort/DonJr all the more interesting.
And...Congress does have the power to impose penalties on those who come before it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress
That said, interesting factoid - do you know who the only three people to have been held in contempt of Congress without complying are:
............time's up.
Lois Lerner
Eric Holder
And Hillary's IT Staffer Bryan Pagliano
Everyone else complied with Congress, even if it meant jail time. Note as well that the numbers are split about 50/50 Republican/Democrat.
I know you're going to say I'm using a "but Obama", but since it's coming up, I find it fascinating.
Makes the Susan Rice v Manafort/DonJr all the more interesting.
Quote:
Let's go for something recent:
Laura Silsby, Child trafficking, and the Death of Monica Peterson:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...ignorecover-it
What standard shall we use? The "Trump is colluding with Russia because he spoke with Putin in front of journalists at a G20 dinner"?
Even Snopes has this as "Unproven" - http://www.snopes.com/monica-petersen-killed/ and the article is less than a page. Probably worried about their own thoughts of suicide.
How many people around the Clintons have to end up dead before you think.....hrmmmmm, maybe there's something here?
Laura Silsby, Child trafficking, and the Death of Monica Peterson:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...ignorecover-it
What standard shall we use? The "Trump is colluding with Russia because he spoke with Putin in front of journalists at a G20 dinner"?
Even Snopes has this as "Unproven" - http://www.snopes.com/monica-petersen-killed/ and the article is less than a page. Probably worried about their own thoughts of suicide.
How many people around the Clintons have to end up dead before you think.....hrmmmmm, maybe there's something here?
Quote:
THE PRESIDENT: So you’re saying – okay, so you’re saying the asset-taking you used to do, and it had an impact, right? And you’re not allowed to do it now?
THE PRESIDENT: And that’s for legal reasons? Or just political reasons?
THE PRESIDENT: So what do you do? So in other words, they have a huge stash of drugs. So in the old days, you take it. Now we’re criticized if we take it. So who gets it? What happens to it? Tell them to keep it?
THE PRESIDENT: And now what happens?
THE PRESIDENT: Who would want that pressure, other than, like, bad people, right? But who would want that pressure? You would think they’d want this stuff taken away.
-----
Yes, clearly a high level of understanding here.
THE PRESIDENT: And that’s for legal reasons? Or just political reasons?
THE PRESIDENT: So what do you do? So in other words, they have a huge stash of drugs. So in the old days, you take it. Now we’re criticized if we take it. So who gets it? What happens to it? Tell them to keep it?
THE PRESIDENT: And now what happens?
THE PRESIDENT: Who would want that pressure, other than, like, bad people, right? But who would want that pressure? You would think they’d want this stuff taken away.
-----
Yes, clearly a high level of understanding here.
Quote:
Notice he's talking about drugs. And if you know anything about Trump, personally, he is VERY anti-intoxicants, having lost a brother to alcoholism (even though he's unlikely to overturn marijuana enforcement).
You just don't like that he's plain-spoken. Which is part of his persuasion.
You just don't like that he's plain-spoken. Which is part of his persuasion.
But yeah, "plain spoken" people are idiots.
07-20-2017
, 10:47 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:50 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:55 AM
07-20-2017
, 10:58 AM
07-20-2017
, 11:19 AM
07-20-2017
, 11:28 AM
07-20-2017
, 11:35 AM
Quote:
Let's go for something recent:
Laura Silsby, Child trafficking, and the Death of Monica Peterson:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...ignorecover-it
What standard shall we use? The "Trump is colluding with Russia because he spoke with Putin in front of journalists at a G20 dinner"?
Even Snopes has this as "Unproven" - http://www.snopes.com/monica-petersen-killed/ and the article is less than a page. Probably worried about their own thoughts of suicide.
How many people around the Clintons have to end up dead before you think.....hrmmmmm, maybe there's something here?
Laura Silsby, Child trafficking, and the Death of Monica Peterson:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...ignorecover-it
What standard shall we use? The "Trump is colluding with Russia because he spoke with Putin in front of journalists at a G20 dinner"?
Even Snopes has this as "Unproven" - http://www.snopes.com/monica-petersen-killed/ and the article is less than a page. Probably worried about their own thoughts of suicide.
How many people around the Clintons have to end up dead before you think.....hrmmmmm, maybe there's something here?
07-20-2017
, 11:38 AM
07-20-2017
, 11:39 AM