Also, try reading the whole article, not just the headlines. Which, you do realize you're attacking they guy Trump fired, right?
After The Times shared some of the documents with representatives of Mr. Manafort, a spokesman, Jason Maloni, did not dispute that the debts might have existed at one time. But he maintained that the Cyprus records were “stale and do not purport to reflect any current financial arrangements.”
A financial statement for a Cyprus shell company, Lucicle Consultants, showing a $9.9 million loan to a Delaware company connected to Mr. Manafort. “Manafort is not indebted to Mr. Deripaska or the Party of Regions, nor was he at the time he began working for the Trump campaign,” Mr. Maloni said.
Donald Trump legitimately does not understand how asset forfeiture works, and that should terrify you, because he just told Jeff Sessions to take more of everyone's ****. Are you even American? Does this affect you?
lol where did you get the impression he doesn't understand
oh yeah because of his limited vocabulary, idk why you guys wont' admit that most of your hate for trump is because he doesn't talk like an elitist politician
More conspiracy theories. We get one for every one you get, right?
Uhhhh I don't see any conspiracy theories in my post or the article, and yes I'm aware Trump eventually fired Manafort. Speaking of which, there was a hilarious article posted in Alpha the other day about Trump doing it because he said Manafort treated him like a baby:
Trump was furious about the report, the Daily Mail reported in a preview of the book.
"You think you've gotta go on TV to talk to me? You treat me like a baby!” Trump said.
“Am I like a baby to you? I sit there like a little baby and watch TV and you talk to me? Am I a f--king baby, Paul?”
You admit then that Podesta was being paid off by the Russians to influence the Clinton campaign then? Good on you.
Originally Posted by goofyballer
That's something that was in my post or the article? Wow, you're right, I guess I didn't read it!
...but more seriously this is a perfect example of how completely intellectually bankrupt you are that you have to make up others' statements to argue, and you do this all the time. That's the kind of **** you have to rely on when you have no actual substance!