Quote:
Originally Posted by Pwn_Master
Anarchists engaged in violence, Democrats did not support them. Democrats did support the peaceful protesters using their free speech rights to express their opposition to Milo. But the anarchists, I denounce them, look, I disavow, okay!
Meanwhile, the College Republicans invited the hatemonger Milo to speak and the actual elected Republicans shut down reading a letter from MLK's wife.
Good to see that you holding mainstream Republicans to the moral standard of violent anarchists since the moral debauchery of each are obvious. Admitting you have a problem is the first step.
Does it matter who shut Milo down? It is clear he was shut down due to violence and illegal means. The peaceful protesters would not have been able to shut him down.
Now I am not sure what evidence you have that the violent anarchists are not Democrats? Really would like to see it. But, it does not matter. Milo was invited, he had every right to speak and was prevented by illegal and violent means. That is wrong. I would have no problem if the place refused to invite him because it violated the rules of the institution or those in charge stopped his speech if he violated those rules.
Further, it is clear that Warren was attacking Sessions character. Just because it is an old letter and from MLK's wife really is besides the point. Warren agreed with the attacks and indicated they would go on if allowed to speak. Now maybe the Senate should get rid of the rule and let the Senators make such attacks. It would make for a more interesting Senate but that is not the rules.
Just like on this forum if you violate the rules the mods can stop you from speaking and delete your post. There really is not much difference.