They did not make an irrational choice. They would rather roll the dice and see what happens than vote for an assured negative outcome. Most people would.

Obviously not every Trumper in PA is an uneducated idiot, but exit polling there shows that he won the "high school or less" educational demographic 56%-43%.

Quote where I said what you claimed. You made a false claim, not me.

You looked up the post number. It's simple to quote me. Do it.

wil, have you ever linked to a study that claimed ~a third of gay men have had over 1000 partners?

You are making sweeping accusations which amount to claims of racism. PA went to Obama twice. Your claims are unfounded and reprehensible.

I'll bring back coal jobs---> nope

A new great health care plan----> nope

Build a wall and Mexico pays ---> nope

Shall I continue?

The coal thing is what won him PA and it was a huge lie.

We do not have to go over that argument again. 2outs made a claim. I asked him to quote me. You are welcome to do it for him.

I predict neither of you will. If you do I'll donate the money to either of you or any charity you wish.

Now quote me.

I don't think you made the claim directly, but I do think you linked to such a study. Did you or didn't you?

He actually said he was going to repeal Ocare day one lolz

They were guaranteed to get nothing with Clinton. They made a rational choice, even if they wind up with nothing 4 years from now. That's all I'm saying. You very well may wind up being right, I fully admit that. I'm simply saying I understand WHY they did it.

I used the word "redneck", but didn't actually mention anyone's race.

I didn't make a sweeping accusation, nor an unfounded claim. The statistic I just cited is from an actual exit poll.

I guess it didn't take long for me to be proven correct.

2outs is wrong and everyone knows it. I rest my case.

Redneck usually refers to Puerto Ricans?

Dutch and French elections tho. So you're not going to answer if you ever linked to a study making such a claim?

No bet was made between any of us. My record is intact.

This has nothing to do with the current discussion. 2outs made a claim and within 20 minutes was proven to be wrong. Not only is my record intact it might have been the quickest victory I've ever had.

Thanks guys, you just make me look better as time goes on. Time for bed, knocking your dicks off makes me sleepy. It's hard work making you people look this bad.

Night.

I need audio and visual references of whites sensitive for the word redneck.

Post 2402 from the "Gay Conservative Milo …. " thread. Here's you linking to the aforementioned study:

Site removed the link, but that's the one we're talking about, as it was discussed in post #2405 by AOFrantic in a response to you:

Here's you asserting you know two such people personally:

Continues on for several pages in which you double-down on the accusation multiple times.

Only in your mind was this a win for you.

they do prefer this system, theres no competition (I have a big chunk of my portfolio in J&J because these companies will never fail essentially) and they get to sell with sky high prices in the USA.

regarding worker protection regulations, that hurts medium business way more, so its exactly what I'm talking about

regarding dodd frank, this is obviously a very complex issue, I personally believe its a horrible piece of legislation that creates bad incentives in that particular market.

not every piece of regulation is good for big buisness obv, the point is pointing to trump lowering regulation as evidence for him being in the pocket of large corporations is wrong. Theres many regulations which end up benefiting large corporations by stifling competition.

I've explained this many, many, many times. I linked a study to make a point that some studies are absurd. I did not link that study to argue it was accurate, I linked it to show how incorrect some studies are. I was making the opposite argument of what you are claiming. Everyone is free to read that exchange, and I stand by every word, 100%.

Go to bed bro you just got served

You should hang out more in this forum, I'll wreck you too, just like I do everyone else.

Sleep well.

Extremely lengthy exchange that went all the way up to post #2900+, and you defended the study multiple times, including this back-and-forth (#2863)

followed by

wil you posted about being "proven wrong", that has nothing to do with betting. You thought the Dutch and French elections were gonna go much better for the far right than they actually did. That was yet another instance you were proven wrong!