Thanks for being honest, wil. This is the point:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
The left.
Okay, so going back to your previous post which argued this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
It's not at all. When Trump's administration has a leak it's patriotism. When Obama had a leak it was treasonous (Valerie Plame).
If we take your mistake out of this and replace Plame with Snowden, turns out liberal beliefs on this aren't as inconsistent as you'd have had us believe earlier. So, one false argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I don't agree with any of this. The media is obviously not one entitty. I fully support a through investigation of the Trump adminstration.
Again, going back to your posts earlier:
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Not surprising that you think "unnamed sources" means "made up". That's one part dumb and one part bootlicking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Of COURSE it's made up! They are caught on tape admitting it's all total nonsense and you believe their "unnamed" sources are legit?
Who is "they" if you don't think the media is one entity, wil? A CNN editor who does health stories or something was caught on tape saying his network overhypes Russia. If you don't think the media is all one single entity then you have a lot of work to do to explain why this CNN health editor's comment means that...
- every single anonymous source referenced by people like David Farenthold or the rest of the news media is false
- all the news reported by all the media is "made up"
Another false argument.
You know that if we go back to stories written months ago about Michael Flynn and stuff, a lot of those cited anonymous sources discussing his problems that eventually turned out to be true, right?
You're just spouting words here, there's no logic or facts behind any of this. It's you and your dumb feels being typed in all capital letters, like always, because that's all you and your 5th grade understanding have to fall back to.