Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

06-29-2017 , 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
They are funny though.

Mind you it wouldn't surprise me if being funny is banned soon.
Conservatives are boring, stuffy, lifeless, puritanical people without a humorous bone in their body, so this shouldn't worry them.
06-29-2017 , 06:59 PM






https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/...29415406161920
https://twitter.com/lisamurkowski/st...97491736702978
https://twitter.com/SenatorCollins/s...45276741402624
https://twitter.com/SenatorLankford/...50390889820160
https://twitter.com/MikeCrapo/status/880496506440220672
https://twitter.com/senorrinhatch/st...72346003480577
06-29-2017 , 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer

https://twitter.com/BenSasse/status/880429821775552514

Republican senator from NE
He's often quick to criticize Trump, which has somehow unfortunately managed to convince some liberals and independents that he's on their side, despite the fact that he's one of the most far-right nuts out there.
06-29-2017 , 07:18 PM
Having a conscience-based response to whatever trump did is something republicans can do or pretend to do, but they only maintain such showings of concern in a short term frame. Where did the republicans' long-term memories about trump go?
06-29-2017 , 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer






https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/...29415406161920
https://twitter.com/lisamurkowski/st...97491736702978
https://twitter.com/SenatorCollins/s...45276741402624
https://twitter.com/SenatorLankford/...50390889820160
https://twitter.com/MikeCrapo/status/880496506440220672
https://twitter.com/senorrinhatch/st...72346003480577
06-29-2017 , 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
Conservatives are boring, stuffy, lifeless, puritanical people without a humorous bone in their body, so this shouldn't worry them.
LOL
06-29-2017 , 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
Conservatives are boring, stuffy, lifeless, puritanical people without a humorous bone in their body, so this shouldn't worry them.
06-29-2017 , 07:26 PM
adios we already know that you and your ilk don't care whatsoever about rampant sexism, that post was for people who do
06-29-2017 , 07:30 PM
Michael Flynn, who is Michael Flynn? Donald Trump barely knows Michael Flynn, certainly never did anything like attempt to obstruct justice on his behalf. Donald Trump has nothing to do with Michael Flynn, yawn, another nothingburger from the far left Wall Street Journal.
06-29-2017 , 07:40 PM
What? Does Merkel's party normally fade people out when they talk too long, even a Secretary? I think you're implying this is out of the ordinary. I don't know if that's true.

But, even if true, it wouldn't be very interesting, imho. The interesting thing is what Secretary Ross was discussing.

From the article you cited:

“As your biggest customer, we hope to obtain a larger share of your market,” he said. “We, as major trading partners of each other, should have a free-trade agreement.”

After organizers cut Ross off during a call to counteract dumping in international trade, Merkel rejected his criticism of Germany’s surplus. She argued that direct investment to the U.S. by German companies should also be considered.

Germany’s Economy Ministry later weighed in to the debate, saying Ross’s criticism “contained nothing new” and dismissing a report he is compiling on the potential risks to the U.S. of steel imports -- a document that Germany fears could have grave consequences for its own steel industry.

“We have absolutely no ground to believe that German steel exports to the U.S. pose a threat to the country’s security,” ministry spokeswoman Tanja Alemany told reporters in Berlin on Wednesday. “Trade is not something where the one side wins and the other side loses.”

Endquote.

To me, the interesting question is what is Trump trying to accomplish and is he making traction. It appears to me (1) he is trying to improve conditions for steel business in the U.S., (2) but I don't know whether he is succeeding.

I don't know much about this, but thanks for the article. This is what I find interesting about it.
06-29-2017 , 08:22 PM
Republicans target all sorts of Americans. Why can't republicans stop themselves? Are they lost, over their heads in a challenging world, and in need of help? Just resign republicans, go do something else other than lord over people with your vain misery. Geez. Y'all GOP suck so bad you're hard to make funny.
06-29-2017 , 10:35 PM
Grunching, but, is wil saying male Asians aren't represented in the male NBA because they get pregnant and have children?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
So... You admit the way the statistics are used in arguments is a bad thing, but you aren't interested in arguing it.

It would be the equivalent of me saying Asians are underrepresented in the NBA, and then suggesting we find ways to equal that out. The argument is absurd. The problem is many leftist arguments are exactly like that, except reversed.
06-29-2017 , 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Having a conscience-based response to whatever trump did is something republicans can do or pretend to do, but they only maintain such showings of concern in a short term frame. Where did the republicans' long-term memories about trump go?
We haven't forgotten.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4eEag2VC-B0
06-29-2017 , 10:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Republicans target all sorts of Americans. Why can't republicans stop themselves? Are they lost, over their heads in a challenging world, and in need of help? Just resign republicans, go do something else other than lord over people with your vain misery. Geez. Y'all GOP suck so bad you're hard to make funny.
We can't be all that bad. We won everything remember?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9mYVi7WHyiU
06-29-2017 , 10:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerodox
What? Does Merkel's party normally fade people out when they talk too long, even a Secretary? I think you're implying this is out of the ordinary. I don't know if that's true.

But, even if true, it wouldn't be very interesting, imho. The interesting thing is what Secretary Ross was discussing.

From the article you cited:

“As your biggest customer, we hope to obtain a larger share of your market,” he said. “We, as major trading partners of each other, should have a free-trade agreement.”

After organizers cut Ross off during a call to counteract dumping in international trade, Merkel rejected his criticism of Germany’s surplus. She argued that direct investment to the U.S. by German companies should also be considered.

Germany’s Economy Ministry later weighed in to the debate, saying Ross’s criticism “contained nothing new” and dismissing a report he is compiling on the potential risks to the U.S. of steel imports -- a document that Germany fears could have grave consequences for its own steel industry.

“We have absolutely no ground to believe that German steel exports to the U.S. pose a threat to the country’s security,” ministry spokeswoman Tanja Alemany told reporters in Berlin on Wednesday. “Trade is not something where the one side wins and the other side loses.”

Endquote.

To me, the interesting question is what is Trump trying to accomplish and is he making traction. It appears to me (1) he is trying to improve conditions for steel business in the U.S., (2) but I don't know whether he is succeeding.

I don't know much about this, but thanks for the article. This is what I find interesting about it.
This is how you discuss an article. I hope others can learn from you.
06-29-2017 , 10:45 PM
paging well named's anger translator

Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
lol. You've demonstrated over and over again that you can't even be bothered to pay attention long enough to know what my position is, so I think you are in no position to call it dishonest.

I repeatedly correct your false claims because you persist in making false claims, and I find it irritating enough to be worth responding to.
06-29-2017 , 11:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
We won
Lies and distractions never stay "won:, you gotta keep em up.
06-30-2017 , 03:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
LOL
Why Conservative Comedy Doesn’t Work And Likely Never Will

Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Lies and distractions never stay "won:, you gotta keep em up.
And won is relative when you trade it for integrity and dignity.
06-30-2017 , 03:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
And won is relative when you trade it for integrity and dignity.
Ehh. Not really, dude. You can argue the Detroit Pistons didn't deserve to win those two championships and back it up by saying the league changed the rules afterwards, but they still own the trophies.

Winning is winning.
06-30-2017 , 04:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
Conservatives are boring, stuffy, lifeless, puritanical people without a humorous bone in their body, so this shouldn't worry them.
Rush Limbaugh is hilarious, especially when he uses that whiny, semi gay sounding voice to imitate liberals.
06-30-2017 , 07:03 AM
aidsios is suiciding by cop
06-30-2017 , 07:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
Imagine those people are crying about some random football player kneeling during the nation anthem if you're having trouble with empathy.
06-30-2017 , 07:58 AM
Adios: less image spamming kthx.
06-30-2017 , 07:59 AM
Quote:
In the midst of the 2016 campaign, a veteran GOP opposition researcher who said he had ties to ousted national security adviser Michael Flynn contacted hackers hoping to obtain emails that he believed Russian operatives had hacked from Hillary Clinton’s personal server, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

Peter W. Smith reached out to computer security experts in the hopes of gaining access to the email trove and explicitly outlined his connection with Flynn in his recruiting emails, according to the report.

Smith, who died at the age of 81 just 10 days after the Journal interviewed him, told the newspaper that he never explicitly said that Flynn was involved with the project. Flynn and the White House did not respond to the Journal’s request for comment, and a Trump campaign representative said Smith had no involvement in the campaign.
Trump Body Count?

Maybe Trump had Seth Rich killed so he could be blamed for the Russian hack.

Things are really starting to fall into place.
06-30-2017 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
Trump Body Count?

Maybe Trump had Seth Rich killed so he could be blamed for the Russian hack.

Things are really starting to fall into place.
No difference between an 81 year old dying and a kid being murdered. Nope, none at all.

So we are at:

Trump: 1
Clinton: 30+

Shall we continue?

      
m