No silly goose, those are the only comments we will have how about it moginig?

Trump Shifted Kids Cancer Charity Money Into His Business

To be fair, owning bahbah is akin to punching a 5 year old in the balls.

It's a strawstrawman.

How?

lol, solid evidence

...lol for ****s sake are you dumb

^^^
So much this.

Yeah but you are now basically arguing on your feels like wil is.

Possibly bahbah's most accurate post.

Depends on what you are measuring. If you are measuring "how much people like you" then probably yes. If you are measuring "did I become the President" then probably no.

Seems like the poster was more attempting the former.

Quoting econ studies from GMU is one of the best indicators of a low information person.

I took a look at The study from GMU. The methodology looks interesting, and I don't know enough and haven't spent enough time to venture any opinion on the validity of the model as far as its estimate of costs, but the authors concede much the same point I made before:

In other words, it's still grossly incorrect to take the output of this model and claim that we could have grown the economy by 25% with no downside whatsoever. They also don't take into account the possibility that a lack of regulation in some industry could lead to conditions that would impede growth in ways not contemplated by their model.

But I don't think there's anything particularly wrong with the argument that regulation should be reviewed, and data on costs is part of that. The problem is in pretending that it's the entire question.

Edit: here's a better quote from the study:

The two are intimately related.

What are the best indicators of a high information person?

Where in your posts is the bolded suported regarding CA and NY? Stating that they could be governed more competently is not the same as stating they don't count.

As far as manufacturing jobs, job growth in manufacturing since January has been net positive. IIRC avg hourly wages are up slightly. I believe jobs in the mining sector have increased. You seem to be implying that TRUMP had failed to fulfill his promise about jobs. Way too early to make that conclusion. Pretty sure that he'll under deliver with his fiscal policy btw but still way too early make that conclusion.

I guess it just hasn't registered with you yet that with HRC promising to shut down the coal industry more or less and promising to outsource more USA manufacturing jobs. a lot of people in those industries thought TRUMP was a better choice and still do.

BLS Link

Study is clear though in indicating regulations can impede economic growth substantially (lido). Of course it is just one study and of course industry needs regulation. Bahbahmickey is obviously claiming the economy/business is extremely over regulated.

Pentagon can’t square Trump comments on Qatar

LOL

What's the issue? I should have expanded on it more and it was sloppy in the way I was using it but I've seen quite a bit when it comes to female success. My wife has a circle of 4 women. They are all more successful, financially, than their husbands. It is becoming way more common now due to many factors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/30/bu...tudy-says.html

Four in 10 American households with children under age 18 now include a mother who is either the sole or primary earner for her family, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of Census and polling data released Wednesday. This share, the highest on record, has quadrupled since 1960.

Also, let's talk about unmarried, childless females. Gee, I wonder how THEY are doing?

http://content.time.com/time/busines...015274,00.html

according to a new analysis of 2,000 communities by a market research company, in 147 out of 150 of the biggest cities in the U.S., the median full-time salaries of young women are 8% higher than those of the guys in their peer group.


And, what is causing it? Gee, maybe it's what I've been saying all along!


Here's the slightly deflating caveat: this reverse gender gap, as it's known, applies only to unmarried, childless women under 30 who live in cities. The rest of working women — even those of the same age, but who are married or don't live in a major metropolitan area — are still on the less scenic side of the wage divide.

Women are not paid less than men. Women make different CHOICES than men. Children are also a huge negative on their money-making ability. Gee, that was REALLY hard to figure out!

Yet the leftists believe this crap hook, line, and sinker. They truly believe that women are paid less than men. It's completely absurdity. If I started my own business and I could pay women less for the same work I'd ONLY HIRE WOMEN! What company wouldn't? Their profit margin would increase immediately if they only hired women they could pay less and their managers would get insane bonuses for increasing their profits!

What's the problem here? What is wrong with my logic? Indeed, in many countries where women are treated unequally their choices are extremely different. In countries like India women are much more represented in areas usually dominated by males. I wonder why? Is it because India is less sexist? Of course not. It's because they have less CHOICES, so they go into the fields where they can make a decent living. They don't WANT to go into the IT field, they HAVE to. It is basic logic.

Look at countries like Afghanistan, where sexism is horrific. You'd be amazed at some of the lengths people go through. Some females are raised and made to appear as boys.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeands...rty-bacha-posh

Mehran is a bacha posh – the literal term translated from Dari for a girl “dressed like a boy” in Afghanistan, the country that the UN says is the worst in the world to be born a girl,

These children, who could almost be said to represent a third gender, cut through ethnic groups and across geographical lines. According to Afghan teachers, midwives and doctors, it is “not uncommon” to find a bacha posh in each school or extended family, because it is easier to have access to an education in the most conservative areas, where few girls are able to go to school.

What, exactly, is your issue with my statement? Of course I wouldn't pour so much of my resources into my daughter if I thought she would not be paid accordingly. If I knew she was destined to get screwed over by society I wouldn't even bother.

What is controversial about that?

Eric Trump thinks Democrats "are not even people"

He has a good point.

A few years ago Republicans were just evil, awful people. That has now switched. Democrats have taken their place.

Proceed accordingly. Shift sides as times change, do not give too much power to the idiocy of either side. And yes, both sides can be idiotic.

Oh, I know you agree. That's what makes you you, and us not you.

Thank God for that.

F**kface over here married one.

Yeah, that's what happened. All the evil Republicans from a few years ago turned good. Then all the good Democrats turned evil. Completely plausible.

The idea of one party or even near a majority of a party being bad people, evil or not even people is so idiotic. It used to be that this level of stupidity was reserved for the liberals. It sucks to see conservatives stooping to this kind of moronic behavior.

I don't care if some prominent liberal compares conservatives to nazi. We need to continue to be the adults in the room and not fall for this garbage.

Peak Goading?