Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

06-04-2017 , 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
And a lot, lot worse for poor people and a lot, lot worse for Muslims and a lot, lot worse for the environment, to name but three things, all of which you, newly unmasked as a far right supporter, clearly relish.
Works for me.
06-04-2017 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
And a lot, lot worse for poor people and a lot, lot worse for Muslims and a lot, lot worse for the environment, to name but three things, all of which you, newly unmasked as a far right supporter, clearly relish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Works for me.
wil is so ****ing sheltered he can nearly always be lead into making like, exactly your point for you.

Of course this is during wil's manic phase, in 3-5 beers he'll be in here sobbing about the imminent destruction of Western civilization and how he doesn't understand why people are mean to him since he's such a nice guy.
06-04-2017 , 05:25 PM
I have a feeling that will be a useful quote some time.
06-04-2017 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
wil is so ****ing sheltered he can nearly always be lead into making like, exactly your point for you.

Of course this is during wil's manic phase, in 3-5 beers he'll be in here sobbing about the imminent destruction of Western civilization and how he doesn't understand why people are mean to him since he's such a nice guy.
Beer is for animals. Grow up.
06-04-2017 , 07:17 PM
Big problem, citations do not substantiate your claim of a promise of high paying jobs. Hint: You need a quote from TRUMP.

Ditto. Show us the specific claims that CA and NY don't matter. Please be specific in who these conservatives are.

Quote:
Conservatives really hate facts, eh?
Not that many facts actually and these "facts" are irrelevant regarding your claim.
06-04-2017 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
adios is the forum poster version of a poker player that would hit and run heads up tables. He will not be back to respond to those citations, let alone read them.
Standard, goofy making it personal.
06-04-2017 , 07:19 PM
Trump, in an absolutely embarrassing episode, deliberately took the mayor of London's comments out of context to attack him less than a day after his city was attacked by terrorists:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadiq Khan, mayor of London
My message to Londoners and visitors to our great city is to be calm and vigilant today. You will see an increased police presence today, including armed officers and uniformed officers. There is no reason to be alarmed by this.
Trump's reaction to the bolded is to try to sow fear and panic:


https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...28428963901440

Pathetic. Thankfully, not all parts of our government are so cowardly, as the acting US ambassador to the UK demonstrates:


https://twitter.com/USAinUK/status/871435629569212416
06-04-2017 , 07:34 PM
WaPo contrasts Trump's response with other world leaders

Quote:
In the early confusion of Saturday's attack in London, as police urged people not to spread rumors, those world leaders who did speak out early were largely circumspect. Restrained. Sympathetic.

“My thoughts go out to the victims and their loved ones,” French President Emmanuel Macron said on Twitter. “Awful news,” wrote Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau the same evening, adding, “We're monitoring the situation.”

And then there was President Trump.

Before London police or anyone else had announced that the attack was linked to terrorism — the president of the United States retweeted an unsourced blurb from Drudge.com: “Fears of new terror attack after van 'mows down 20 people' on London Bridge.”

London authorities at that point had confirmed only a few details. Shortly after the Drudge tweet, British police again warned against spreading unconfirmed information.


Fifteen minutes later, Trump issued his second tweet since the attack — promoting his administration's legally embattled “travel ban,” which hinders people from several Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States.

This reminds me of an article from ~a week ago, contrasting how quickly Trump jumps to use Islamic terrorist attacks for political purposes with his more muted responses to other kinds of terrorism: Trump’s quick to tweet about terror and TV, slower on things like the attack in Portland



I'm surprised by the incompleteness of this article, actually - it doesn't include Trump's swift response to the killing of 1 police officer in Paris recently before the election (if you all remember when he thought it would affect the results - whoops, about that...), or the Quebec mosque attack where Trump shamefully never publicly responded at all to the execution of 6 Muslim immigrants by a right-wing terrorist.
06-04-2017 , 07:35 PM
its possible to take mr terrorism is just a fact of life in a big city out of context?
06-04-2017 , 07:43 PM
Even the conservative Jennifer Rubin is embarrassed at how Donald Trump makes our country look

Quote:
Meanwhile — and it pains me to write this — our president acted like a clod, a heartless and dull-witted thug in sending out a series of tweets. He — commander in chief and leader of the Free World — first retweeted an unverified, unofficial Drudge headline about the unfolding terrorist attack. Then he aimed to bolster his Muslim travel ban (which is not supposed to be a Muslim travel ban).
Quote:
But this is vintage Trump — impulsive and cruel, without an ounce of class or human decency. His behavior no longer surprises us, but it should offend and disturb us, first, that he remains the face and voice of America in the world and, second, that his fans hoot and holler, seeing this as inconsequential or acceptable conduct.
Quote:
In instances like this, those who would lecture us on President Obama’s under-appreciation of America’s unique place in human history or proclaim that they simply had to vote for Trump because Hillary Clinton was some sort of monster are exposed as fools or hypocrites or both.
06-04-2017 , 07:59 PM
As a conservative I have to admit it is sickening to see our president call a terrorist attack a terrorist attack. Add this to the list of all the vile things he has said.
06-04-2017 , 08:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Big problem, citations do not substantiate your claim of a promise of high paying jobs. Hint: You need a quote from TRUMP.



Ditto. Show us the specific claims that CA and NY don't matter. Please be specific in who these conservatives are.



Not that many facts actually and these "facts" are irrelevant regarding your claim.
Oh dear God. Wiggle harder.

You could go on any website anywhere with a comments section related to politics and find umpteen conservatives ranting about liberal elites, how CA is a socialist hellhole, how Hillary only won the popular vote because of CA, how these coastal meccas aren't "real America", etc etc etc. You know this is true. The far-right hates these places, but happily takes their money.

As far as Trump, you know he pitched improvements in the coal mining and manufacturing industries in the Midwest/Rust Belt. That's what enabled him to flip 5 states there (and curiously, nearly flip Minnesota)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.166000f5957a

"I made them this promise. We will put our miners back to work."

http://time.com/4570070/donald-trump-coal-jobs/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press...facturing-ceos

THE PRESIDENT: "Well, thank you very much. It's a great honor to have everybody. And some of the great people in the world of business, many of you I know -- many of you I know from reading all of our wonderful magazines and business magazines, in particular. So it's an honor to have you with us today.

Bringing manufacturing back to America, creating high-wage jobs was one of our campaign promises and themes, and it resonated with everybody. It was really something what happened. States that hadn’t been won in many, many years were -- they came over to our fold. A lot of it had to do with the jobs, and other reasons -- but jobs. And I'm delivering on everything that we've said. In fact, people are saying they've never seen so much happen in 30 days of a presidency. We've delivered on a lot."

Oh, and by the way, I didn't provide facts? I fully backed my claim that CA/NY provide almost 1/4 of this country's GDP, and that in terms of federal tax dollars red states drain while blue states pour.
06-04-2017 , 08:05 PM
so neo con that writes for pj media and wapo is embarrassed at donald trump the anti-neo con

what a surprise
06-04-2017 , 08:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
As a conservative I have to admit it is sickening to see our president call a terrorist attack a terrorist attack. Add this to the list of all the vile things he has said.
Exactly. I mean it's just a few jihadis exercising their religious beliefs.

How intolerant of him to call it terrorism.
06-04-2017 , 08:15 PM
you guys know that hammering trump on his harsh reaction to terrorist attacks is not winning you any points right? Its terrible strategy, this is why trump got elected
06-04-2017 , 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
As a conservative I have to admit it is sickening to see our president call a terrorist attack a terrorist attack. Add this to the list of all the vile things he has said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Exactly. I mean it's just a few jihadis exercising their religious beliefs.

How intolerant of him to call it terrorism.
You guys would be better off saying nothing at all than coming up with responses this poor. It gives up how utterly weak your position is when the only thing you can do is build strawmen to tear down.
06-04-2017 , 09:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
You guys would be better off saying nothing at all than coming up with responses this poor. It gives up how utterly weak your position is when the only thing you can do is build strawmen to tear down.
Goof, how is this a strawman? Your two posts prior to my post criticized trump for how he called a terrorist attack a terrorist attack and then I agreed and said he shouldn't have called it a terrorist attack. I'm just trying to join you and other liberals on the everything trumps says is vile train.
06-04-2017 , 10:08 PM
You're suggesting the article was the equivalent of 'calling a terrorist attack a terrorist attack'.

The author was critical of him because he attacked the mayor of london for telling people not to panic / that the situation was being dealt with, and then within a couple of minutes used the tragedy to support his policy goals.

I don't think either of those things are particularly offensive, but i would say it's in pretty bad taste. We've just become so desensitized to his tactlessness that it seems normal.
06-04-2017 , 10:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
Goof, how is this a strawman? Your two posts prior to my post criticized trump for how he called a terrorist attack a terrorist attack
Stopping you here - nope. Stop lying, or learn to read if this isn't just dumb trolling and you actually believe it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbaddabba
he attacked the mayor of london for telling people not to panic / that the situation was being dealt with
Not only this - Trump blatantly mischaracterized the mayor's comments.
06-04-2017 , 11:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbaddabba
You're suggesting the article was the equivalent of 'calling a terrorist attack a terrorist attack'.

The author was critical of him because he attacked the mayor of london for telling people not to panic / that the situation was being dealt with, and then within a couple of minutes used the tragedy to support his policy goals.

I don't think either of those things are particularly offensive, but i would say it's in pretty bad taste. We've just become so desensitized to his tactlessness that it seems normal.
Goofs posted twice back to back about it and the first one was a wapo article that he quoted his favorite parts of the article. It accuses trump of calling a terrorist attack a terrorist attack. goof then goes on to mention another article he read and complains about how trump often tweets about real news events within a day or week of them taking place.
06-05-2017 , 12:18 AM
Yeah, apparently goofy thinks Trump shouldn't jump to conclusions when knife-wielding men stab everyone in sight after running over pedestrians with a van.

After all it might just be road rage or something.
06-05-2017 , 12:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Yeah, apparently goofy thinks Trump shouldn't jump to conclusions when knife-wielding men stab everyone in sight after running over pedestrians with a van.

After all it might just be road rage or something.
Again, the fact that all you can do here is put words into others' mouths (where did I say anything remotely like that?) shows the utter weakness of your position.

As the article says, including in the portion I quoted:

Quote:
In the early confusion of Saturday's attack in London, as police urged people not to spread rumors, those world leaders who did speak out early were largely circumspect. Restrained. Sympathetic.
Quote:
London authorities at that point had confirmed only a few details. Shortly after the Drudge tweet, British police again warned against spreading unconfirmed information.
Not only did he link the Drudge Report of all things (Sushy, I know you're someone who purports to be very concerned with fake news - this should bother you!), but he did so at a time when nobody knew **** and British authorities were concerned about potential misinformation being spread. It's super reckless for him to say anything at all beyond boilerplate condolences and well-wishes.

And then what he did say was incredibly undiplomatic (to say nothing of dishonestly mischaracterizing the mayor of London's words to attack him within a day of the attack, for ****'s sake) and used the terrorist attack for political gain. After all, that's what Trump really wants out of terrorist attacks - he doesn't actually care about the victims, because if the attack wasn't perpetrated by Muslims to fit the narrative he enjoys then he basically won't say **** about it.

All of the above are objectionable aspects of his response. You and mickey simply reduce the objection to "calling a terrorist attack a terrorist attack" because that's all you guys have: lies. As always, there's zero logic, facts, or real arguments on your side.
06-05-2017 , 01:29 AM
LOL. Come on goofy, get a grip.

Everyone knew it was a terrorist attack as soon as the initial reports came out.

You spend too much time in that delusional bubble over in alpha. It's warping your sense of reality.
06-05-2017 , 01:48 AM
No they didn't. They assumed it was and on this occasion were right.

There have been other reports of "terrorist attacks" that turned out to be nothing of the sort.
06-05-2017 , 02:05 AM
Oh right. It could have been road rage.

Lol jalfrezi.

      
m