Do you realize how stupid this sounds?

"Okay guy's get your pepper spray and baseball bats, we're gonna take on the guy's with assault rifles".

read the article. one man in the Oathkeepers wanted to arm the protestors. he was met with massive resistance from the other leaders and members of the group and eventually he either quit or was kicked out and the head of OK put out a video attacking his character and claiming he was a wife abuser.

this is an antigovernment group that had pointed guns at federal agents at the bundy ranch. when the dude wanted to march with blacks at ferguson, the leaders of the Oathkeepers declined and instead advocated working with local authorities.

so the group that portrays itself as a check on govt overreach and has resisted the govt at every other event, preferred to work with the govt rather than allow black ppl to exercise their 2nd amendment rights and march alongside them.

the guy in the article, the guy that you are confused about, was absolutely gobsmacked that at the resistance he faced and the realization that he had joined a racist right wing group genuinely floored him.

he proly should get the "raised by wolves" award.

What the **** is this trash and why is Matt allowing it on his site? Nazis commit terrorism and this piece of **** is blaming it on the Jews.

Exactly my point.

That's not a point.

Yeah its obvious most of the protesters confronting the armored, weapon carrying "free speech" white supremacist were there unarmed and there for peaceful protest.

But even if not and you give into their what abouts and both sides bull**** and say both sides were looking for a fight. Where does that leave them accept for being Nazi, white supremacists apologists.

Give me a cite were I said anything like this?

One guy not Nazis committed this crime.

I am Jewish.

Get your facts straight or get lost.

This post is over the line. Anything more along these lines and you or anybody else posting this crap will be issued a timeout.

You are an apologists for them. And have been in many posts.

Why would there be?

Yeah. More specifically, It's white supremacist/nazi terrorism apologism and also a sort moral vampirism using whataboutism. "What about the rumored baseball bats?"

This is over the line? Give me a break. Explain to me and the rest of us how this is over the line?

BTW, respond without using your emotions because I sense you're on a mission to silence the right.

srsly just guest him right now

ahahahah yeah

so it turns out monistat wasn't trolling

Can you cite the white supremacists talking point that (((George Soros))) bused in paid antifa and hired actors to play Nazis?

Constructive discourse right here in Chezfront

Rightly or wrongly, mods of this forum very rarely ban a poster outright (I honestly don't think it has ever happened). Ever-increasing timeouts from the forum are the preferred sanctions.

The idea, perhaps naive, is that we don't want to prevent them for contributing to or otherwise partaking of the other forums 2+2 has to offer.

Yeah, if you're whining about the guy with a bat and not the Nazi with the rifle, it's mindbogglingly stupid.

So much for open discourse in P7.

What a farce.

I think the bussing in and paying of antifa is quite believable since it has been done before.

The actors part seems less likely, but certainly possible.

You should want to prevent Nazi's from contributing to 2+2, this forum is also like 5 minutes old and has rule changes more frequently than half the posters here wash so it's not like there's a precedent that matters.

You're either lying or should be deeply ashamed of yourself. I doubt you're being totally honest considering your "Bartmizva" post.

Whosnext would love to ban people if he could. Especially people he doesn't agree with.

He can definitely ban people

I never said I was a good Jew. I actually stopped practicing after my Bart Mitzvah. My parents wanted me to continue going to Sunday school. Unfortunately, that was on football day. I've been to a synogogue maybe 5 times since.