Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I did not claim that it implied that there is an entirely different sex/gender. However, I would point out that I think you have a problem in your understanding of the relationship between conceptual categories (sex/gender) and biology. But that's not relevant to the point I was making. I only claimed that there is a biological basis to being transgender.
My understanding is that the post I quoted was arguing exactly what you think it is not arguing. Perhaps I'm wrong, but that's what it implies to me.
Did you read the article, or did you read the study. I'm certain you did not read the study if you think it says anything other than some "TG" have similar white matter than some females. Using that to state that as evidence of TG as a sex or gender is absurd.
As a condition, not a sex or gender. Biology. Man, I should of known, you'd have to clarify your words to something other than what they actually say.