Didn't get an answer to this.

Also wil, as you've yet again brought your daughter into these hypothetical scenarios, what would your reaction be if, aged say 18, she tells you and her mum that she wants to become a man because she's always felt she should have been born male?

Would you be supportive, as a good parent? And which toilet would you want her to use, in both pre and post op scenarios?

On the other side of the coin, which party exploits black victim mentality the most?

Your party has problems because you ask loaded questions like that.

The reason people skip over your posts is because theyre mostly garbled nonsense, like this ****in gem right here.

It's not any more loaded than insinuating 'white racial grievances.'

Should post op transexuals be allowed in the bathroom of the gender they say they are or what their birth certificate says? If they are allowed then you'll have everyone with the same genitals in the same bathroom, if you say no they have to go with their original gender, then you'll have some genitalia mixing.

You know I wasn't talking about you calling me stupid right? I was talking about this myth about American starving which you completely made up.

You couldn't understand that post? It seems pretty obvious, if a woman transitions and gains male genitalia then you guys want him to keep using the women's room, even while you're simultaneously complaining that you're trying to keep penises out of the women's room. You should work on your reading comprehension if it was really that difficult for you.

Isn't that the flip side of white grievances? Political correctness gone mad, having to pay money to welfare babies, worried about crime when a black family moves in or black kid goes to school, extremely worried about vetting of refugees or about immigrant crime, nonchalance about white extremist organizations?

Well aside from being a different term, you've switched to insinuation. I would apply skepticism on your use of either term at this time.

Some of your posts are actually decent. This one not so much. Put some effort in.

There is nothing about "transitioning" in there. Dude really needs to stop.

Quote for JerkoffMag so we can get some sort of prop going.

the best posts are the deleted posts

come the **** on already...

I don't really think there should be laws either way for this kind of stuff, it's really ridiculous virtue-signalling and discrimination LARPing. Let public opinion decide on a case by case basis. However in general TG need to know they are different and they will be treated differently and need to be equipped with the psychological skills for dealing with it. No law will change this.

If you genuinely think a piece of transplanted thigh flesh is a penis then I dunno what to say.

Yes and no. It is in the sense that one party uses each one to exploit their voting base. Republicans use white-grievance to exploit white voters. Democrats, on the flip side, encourage and exploit colored-victimization to get votes for themselves.

You mean this?

"This enactment amends the Canadian Human Rights Act to add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination.

The enactment also amends the Criminal Code to extend the protection against hate propaganda set out in that Act to any section of the public that is distinguished by gender identity or expression and to clearly set out that evidence that an offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on gender identity or expression constitutes an aggravating circumstance that a court must take into consideration when it imposes a sentence."

https://openparliament.ca/bills/42-1/C-16/

What's the problem with it?

What are you talking about man? If we are arguing about whether it is normal or abnormal, it seems we've already accepted it's existence.

Remember when somebody linking an article that refuted their own post, in that very same post, was An Event?

That there shouldn't be laws against these things is the Democratic position! The Republicans are the ones who are wanting genetic tests to prove which bathroom you go to as some kind of virtue signal to the idea that men are truly men and women are truly women. That's literally what the whole thing is about!

This is obvious nonsense. Bill C-16 in Canada is a relevant example. Republicans aren't penning new legislation saying there needs to be genetic tests to use a bathroom, that's absurd. Liberals are the ones who love daddy government and want ever expanding laws to 'protect' their victim classes.

You rarely need genetic tests to tell the difference between a man and a woman.

Who gives a sh*t about Canada?

Compelled speech for one. Do some research.

Right, they're just penning laws saying you need a birth certificate, which is totally reasonable and not absurd.

Hahaha yeah, cause Republicans aren't writing "religious freedom" laws or bathroom bills, Republicans haaaaaate using legislation to further their social goals LOL