Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

07-20-2017 , 11:44 AM
JiggyMac will still be talking about the 2016 election in 2025.
07-20-2017 , 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut


ouch



stay in white house working, no vacations derp derp
It is literally impossible to get anything done if you stay at a hotel/resort that has a golf course.
07-20-2017 , 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
You would be OK with him firing Mueller? (indirectly, ofc)
There is nothing there so they want him fired before he finds all the nothing.
07-20-2017 , 11:49 AM

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/888060798362423297



https://twitter.com/GlennKesslerWP/s...56376391499776
07-20-2017 , 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
You mean Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and Paula Jones? Oh wait. Should they just put some ice on that?

Where are Trump's accusers now? Still breathing I assume, even if they're liars.

Care to address the human trafficking allegations though?
I meant the 13 year old and all the other women.


And lol address what? You must not be paying attention. I have no issue putting the Clinton's in jail if they did wrong. Do it to it conspiracy theorists.
07-20-2017 , 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
putin bot projecting about murdering political foes
I think we're done here. No need for me to address you any further.
07-20-2017 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
It is literally impossible to get anything done if you stay at a hotel/resort that has a golf course.
Hahaha...quoting fake news.

Trump has signed 42 pieces of legislation:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...status_value=0

The count even came from ****ing CNN!

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/19/politi...ths/index.html
07-20-2017 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
I meant the 13 year old and all the other women.


And lol address what? You must not be paying attention. I have no issue putting the Clinton's in jail if they did wrong. Do it to it conspiracy theorists.
Where are the accusers? Where are their court cases? Or were they just being put up to it in order smear the candidate?

You admit that Clinton is scum then.

Paula Jones went to court.
07-20-2017 , 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Hahaha...quoting fake news.

Trump has signed 42 pieces of legislation:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...status_value=0

The count even came from ****ing CNN!

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/19/politi...ths/index.html
Dishonest, yet again.

The quote said "major" pieces of legislation, which is exactly what's in the article you linked:

Quote:
In all, Trump has signed 42 bills into law. Most notable is the Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act, bipartisan legislation that makes it easier for the VA to fire bad employees and offer stronger safeguards for would-be whistleblowers.
But when it comes to big ticket items, like infrastructure, tax reform or a repeal and/or replacement of Obamacare, Trump is sitting on a goose egg -- zero.
07-20-2017 , 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Where are the accusers? Where are their court cases? Or were they just being put up to it in order smear the candidate?

You admit that Clinton is scum then.

Paula Jones went to court.
You started the speculation game with no good evidence, i was just joining in. I mean if you are going to bring up unproven allegations it seems only fair. Not that you work on that principal or have any really.
07-20-2017 , 12:06 PM
JiggyMac, how do you feel about Trump's stance on protecting internet privacy and his Tech & Innovation agenda more broadly?
07-20-2017 , 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
JiggyMac will still be talking about the 2016 election in 2025.
'Pavlovian radical clintonizing' is staple of conservative talk radio. Pre-packaged lock-step for their lazy base.
07-20-2017 , 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
I think we're done here. No need for me to address you any further.

Welcome to folks "dismissed" by MiggyJac.
07-20-2017 , 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
You started the speculation game with no good evidence, i was just joining in. I mean if you are going to bring up unproven allegations it seems only fair. Not that you work on that principal or have any really.
*cough cough* Russia *cough*
07-20-2017 , 12:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
JiggyMac, how do you feel about Trump's stance on protecting internet privacy and his Tech & Innovation agenda more broadly?
America first is great.
This is good -https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2017/07/19/made-america-roundtable?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_c ontent=20170720_ADM_1600-Daily

And these Union guys (who had NEVER been invited to the WhiteHouse before)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/b...pagewanted=all

Bringing the tech CEOs to the WhiteHouse was fantastic.

Jamie Dimon calling out our politicians for not getting their **** together was spot on - http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/14/jpms-...ings-call.html

I think, like all things Trump, is that he'll get the feedback he needs to make the right decisions. He is excellent at A/B testing.

Is there something specific you'd like to link to?
07-20-2017 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Welcome to folks "dismissed" by MiggyJac.
If you can't hurt them with juicy barbs copied from the internet and get reassuring lols from the other clowns, dismiss them.
07-20-2017 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
*cough cough* Russia *cough*
Yes i know. You guys have a conspiracy on why the IC is making up that Russia attacked our election system. But you never get to the good stuff.
07-20-2017 , 12:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Let's go for something recent:

Laura Silsby, Child trafficking, and the Death of Monica Peterson:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...ignorecover-it

What standard shall we use? The "Trump is colluding with Russia because he spoke with Putin in front of journalists at a G20 dinner"?

Even Snopes has this as "Unproven" - http://www.snopes.com/monica-petersen-killed/ and the article is less than a page. Probably worried about their own thoughts of suicide.
Of course you are a pizzagate moron. Of course.

Anyway, it looks like dumbass conspiracy detectives were harassing people at Monica Peterson's memorial:
Quote:
Petersen’s grieving family was hounded as #MonicaPetersen started trending and her name was added to a list of people allegedly murdered by the Clintons over the years. A faux investigator showed up at the University of Denver memorial service, asking questions and taking photographs. A comment made by d’Estree at the memorial service – that Petersen “decided to take on one of the demagogues in the field of human trafficking” – was interpreted as referring to Clinton when in fact he was talking about Siddarth Kara. Suddenly, the non-existent investigation was supposedly confirmed. Efforts to correct the record often were dismissed.
These ****ing idiots are infuriating.

Quote:
How many people around the Clintons have to end up dead before you think.....hrmmmmm, maybe there's something here?
Most of the people claimed to be part of the "CLINTON BODY COUNT" either have no connection to the Clintons or died in non-mysterious ways. I wonder why people would lie about that.

Last edited by 13ball; 07-20-2017 at 12:21 PM.
07-20-2017 , 12:17 PM
****ing horrible, just to turn a few bucks, and the JiggyMacs eat that **** up hoping and praying it hurts "lefties"
07-20-2017 , 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
Yes i know. You guys have a conspiracy on why the IC is making up that Russia attacked our election system. But you never get to the good stuff.
Well since the IC is now down to 4 from 17, meh.

Give law enforcement the servers. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
07-20-2017 , 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
Of course you are a pizzagate moron. Or course.

Anyway, it looks like dumbass conspiracy detectives were harassing people at Monica Peterson's memorial:


These ****ing idiots are infuriating.



Most of the people claimed to be part of the "CLINTON BODY COUNT" either have no connection to the Clintons or died in non-mysterious ways. I wonder why people would lie about that.
Whitewater
Travelgate
Rape
Arms sales to Libya
Saudi Pipeline deal through Syria
Selling secrets to the Chinese
Giving NK nuclear reactors
Selling Uranium to Russia
Foreign money given to the Clinton Foundation
Speaking fees in Russia
Not turning over the DNC servers
Colluding with the DNC to screw Bernie
Getting debate questions from CNN
and I know I'm forgetting many.

If Trump did 1/10th of what the Clintons have been accused of, your head would explode.
All you've got is "muh Russia".

Give me a ****ing break. And you wonder why Trump supporters don't take your accusations seriously.
07-20-2017 , 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
You mean Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and Paula Jones? Oh wait. Should they just put some ice on that?

Where are Trump's accusers now? Still breathing I assume, even if they're liars.
They are alive. Just like Clinton's accusers.
07-20-2017 , 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
America first is great.
This is good -https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2017/07/19/made-america-roundtable?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_c ontent=20170720_ADM_1600-Daily

And these Union guys (who had NEVER been invited to the WhiteHouse before)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/b...pagewanted=all

Bringing the tech CEOs to the WhiteHouse was fantastic.

Jamie Dimon calling out our politicians for not getting their **** together was spot on - http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/14/jpms-...ings-call.html

I think, like all things Trump, is that he'll get the feedback he needs to make the right decisions. He is excellent at A/B testing.

Is there something specific you'd like to link to?
I was talking about this:

Quote:
Today, President Trump is announcing a Technology and Innovation Agenda with five key parts. First, his plan will leverage technology to create well-paid jobs on Main Street, through new commitments in STEM computing and education, support to business ecosystems, and other policies to build the human capital pipeline. Second, their plan will offer high-speed broadband to all Americans, connect public places like airports and stations and allow them to offer free WiFi and lay the groundwork for the next generation of mobile Internet and Internet Things. Third, its agenda will ensure that the United States continues to be the world leader in technology, promoting more high-tech exports and ensuring the free flow of data. Fourthly, your plan will set the rules of the road to support innovation-standards that encourage healthy competition, reduce barriers to entry, and effectively protect intellectual property while protecting privacy and security. Fifth, your plan will make our government smarter, more efficient and more receptive, using new technologies to deliver real results to the American people.
07-20-2017 , 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Well since the IC is now down to 4 from 17, meh.

Give law enforcement the servers. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Yes more like that. What conspiracy's are bouncing around in that brain you got. Why is the CIA, FBI and the NSA lying about Russian interference in our election?
07-20-2017 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Whitewater
Travelgate
Rape
Arms sales to Libya
Saudi Pipeline deal through Syria
Selling secrets to the Chinese
Giving NK nuclear reactors
Selling Uranium to Russia
Foreign money given to the Clinton Foundation
Speaking fees in Russia
Not turning over the DNC servers
Colluding with the DNC to screw Bernie
Getting debate questions from CNN
and I know I'm forgetting many.

If Trump did 1/10th of what the Clintons have been accused of, your head would explode.
All you've got is "muh Russia".

Give me a ****ing break. And you wonder why Trump supporters don't take your accusations seriously.
Does this mean you are backing away from the very stupid CLINTON BODY COUNT conspiracy?

      
m