Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

07-18-2017 , 12:15 AM
Not a liberal and rarely watch it. You guy suck at this.


Accept Kate Bolduan, she kicks ass.
07-18-2017 , 12:22 AM
Silly trumpists can't even craft a thoughtful binary dilemma.
07-18-2017 , 12:48 AM
Kate Bolduan sucks.
07-18-2017 , 12:55 AM
She seems like a no bull****ter. But you have probably seen more of her then me as a CNN addict...so you could be right. Though you got hoodwinked by a conman so its hard to trust your view.
07-18-2017 , 12:58 AM
Well, I must admit I do watch more of it than I should. Purely for the laughs though.

The unintentional comedy is priceless.
07-18-2017 , 01:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Well, I must admit I do watch more of it than I should. Purely for the laughs though.

The unintentional comedy is priceless.
Lemon twists are often found in vodka, therefore if Don Lemon doesn't turn over his taxes, obviously he committed treason by colluding with Russia.

Bwahaha!

07-18-2017 , 01:38 AM
LOL. Nailed it.
07-18-2017 , 01:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/o...language-.html

this is the source of goofy's hatred of trump, rofl
Didn't read but you've yet to accurately describe (and frequently lie about) the reasons why liberals don't like Trump, and I'm guessing you didn't get any better here!

You and JiggyMac have now posted more WaPo and NYT opinion pieces in this thread than I have LOL
07-18-2017 , 02:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Didn't read but you've yet to accurately describe (and frequently lie about) the reasons why liberals don't like Trump, and I'm guessing you didn't get any better here!
Because we literally can't let this man get the nuclear codes.

07-18-2017 , 03:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Economics

"Adolf Hitler, both in public and in private, expressed disdain for capitalism, arguing that it holds nations ransom in the interests of a parasitic cosmopolitan rentier class.[207] He opposed free market capitalism's profit-seeking impulses and desired an economy in which community interests would be upheld.[191]
Hitler distrusted capitalism for being unreliable due to its egotism, and he preferred a state-directed economy that is subordinated to the interests of the Volk.[207]"

"Another radical Nazi, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, had stressed the socialist character of Nazism, and claimed in his diary in the 1920s that if he were to pick between Bolshevism and capitalism, he said "in final analysis", "it would be better for us to go down with Bolshevism than live in eternal slavery under capitalism".[212]"
This was a good try but you're still not getting it.

Hint: it says it right in your quote.
07-18-2017 , 03:50 AM
Wow at the last ~70 posts. It's surreal the level of stupid when these people actually try to talk about trump in a trump thread.
07-18-2017 , 09:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
Wow at the last ~70 posts. It's surreal the level of stupid when these people actually try to talk about trump in a trump thread.
Say it with me - The President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
07-18-2017 , 09:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
(His term started in 2013, Hillary left State in 2009 - the point remains however).
lol JiggyMac

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Make sure you cite facts, not future estimates.

Here's some debunking of what you're about to claim:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...kill-thousands
"Post facts, not estimates of the future. <link to estimate of the future>"

lol JiggyMac
07-18-2017 , 09:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
You and JiggyMac have now posted more WaPo and NYT opinion pieces in this thread than I have LOL
We try to dumb things down to the Leftists level. Doesn't seem to matter though.
07-18-2017 , 09:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
lol JiggyMac



"Post facts, not estimates of the future. <link to estimate of the future>"

lol JiggyMac
Wow! That's your takeaway?!? You read an article that says "estimates of the future are inaccurate" and you state "these are estimates of the future".

Is it that you:

a) Don't understand what you're talking about?
b) Willfully misrepresent your opponent's positions?

Curious.
07-18-2017 , 10:00 AM
The extremist right wingers like you are very smart. Its why you see though conman so well.
07-18-2017 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
Wow at the last ~70 posts. It's surreal the level of stupid when these people actually try to talk about trump in a trump thread.


The hunt for mature, thoughtful trump supporters continues.
07-18-2017 , 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Wow! That's your takeaway?!? You read an article that says "estimates of the future are inaccurate" and you state "these are estimates of the future".

Is it that you:

a) Don't understand what you're talking about?
b) Willfully misrepresent your opponent's positions?

Curious.
The title of the article is "No, Obamacare Repeal Will Not Kill Tens of Thousands". That is a statement about the future.
07-18-2017 , 11:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
The title of the article is "No, Obamacare Repeal Will Not Kill Tens of Thousands". That is a statement about the future.
Refuting an assertion is now a prediction? What is wrong with you?
07-18-2017 , 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Refuting an assertion about the future is now a prediction about the future? What is wrong with you?
fyp
07-18-2017 , 11:28 AM
I refute the assertion it will rain tomorrow is a prediction about whether it will rain tomorrow. jfc you people
07-18-2017 , 11:32 AM
Spoiler:
What is wrong with you?
07-18-2017 , 11:33 AM
Saying "you're wrong" is not the same as saying "I'm right". Logic, escaping Leftists since time immemorial.
07-18-2017 , 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Refuting an assertion is now a prediction? What is wrong with you?
Yes. If it is asserted that the future outcome will be in the set A, and you refute that assertion, you are yourself making an assertion that the future outcome, call it f, will be in the set U - A where U is the possible universe of outcomes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggyMac
Saying "you're wrong" is not the same as saying "I'm right". Logic, escaping Leftists since time immemorial.
"You're wrong" is not equivalent to "I'm right", but they are both statements that are dependent on fact.
07-18-2017 , 11:40 AM
I love the douche bag tags that Jiggy puts at the end of each fail post. Really puts the drumpf touch on it.

      
m