Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

07-13-2017 , 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
You have no way of knowing what all the facts are yet.
Facts don't matter. Trump could drink Putin's urine and Sushy would come along and praise his aggressive and innovative approach to sewage treatment.
07-13-2017 , 09:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Are you saying she is disgusting because she is open and expressive about being a Muslim?
Telling a person that has been subjected to FGM that her vagina should be taken away is fairly disgusting imo.
07-13-2017 , 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
You have no way of knowing what all the facts are yet.
True. I can only go on the facts that are known at this stage. That's all anyone can do.

The facts so far indicate that no crime has been committed and no treason has been committed. Until facts are presented that indicate otherwise, that will remain the case. Quite simple really.
07-13-2017 , 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Telling a person that has been subjected to FGM that her vagina should be taken away is fairly disgusting imo.
That's an incredibly specific thing to reference in response to smack talk directed at two people.
07-13-2017 , 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
True. I can only go on the facts that are known at this stage. That's all anyone can do.

The facts so far indicate that no crime has been committed and no treason has been committed. Until facts are presented that indicate otherwise, that will remain the case. Quite simple really.
That's not how it works. That's like saying the facts so far indicate there was no music playing in the room, and no one burped, farted, or scratched their ass. We don't know all the facts. Lack of particular facts does not mean a particular thing did or did not happen.

That said, we already know it was, at the least, a very unethical and un-American thing to do.
07-13-2017 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
That's not how it works. That's like saying the facts so far indicate there was no music playing in the room, and no one burped, farted, or scratched their ass. We don't know all the facts. Lack of particular facts does not mean a particular thing did or did not happen.

That said, we already know it was, at the least, a very unethical and un-American thing to do.
LOL. That is how it works. You can't convict someone without factual evidence.

No evidence, no crime. In the eyes of the law.

Until evidence is produced that proves a crime was committed, then nobody is guilty of a crime.
07-13-2017 , 09:59 PM
One can suspect someone with reasonable evidence. I love it.
07-13-2017 , 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
LOL. That is how it works. You can't convict someone without factual evidence.

No evidence, no crime. In the eyes of the law.

Until evidence is produced that proves a crime was committed, then nobody is guilty of a crime.
Well that's not what you were saying. Let's just fix up your previous post so that you get a win.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
There is no treason. No crime has been committed. The only thing he possibly was guilty of is naievity.

He has not been convicted of treason. He has not been convicted of a crime. He was possibly naive.
07-13-2017 , 10:05 PM
Sushy is right this isn't treason but it can be interpreted that Jr broke a federal law. That argument can and quite possibly is going to be made. You can choose to disagree with it but to not acknowledge its obvious existence is why few respect any opinion you bring to the table.
07-13-2017 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
LOL. That is how it works. You can't convict someone without factual evidence.

No evidence, no crime. In the eyes of the law.

Until evidence is produced that proves a crime was committed, then nobody is guilty of a crime.
Can you define what you mean by evidence? Serious question.
07-13-2017 , 10:12 PM
You define what crime we are talking about first.
07-13-2017 , 10:17 PM
Like you were told above that's not how this works. Now let's raise our maturity level and avoid answering a question with a question. I'm not talking about Trump right now. I'm asking about what you mean by evidence when you mentioned it above? Be careful in your answer, your response already proves to me you know this but I'm simply looking out for you.

So evidence, define it for me please...
07-13-2017 , 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerodox
Here is the alleged set-up, from the Circa article Sushy cited.


[Emphasis added].
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoOrDoNot
This is exactly why I didn't post any sources or even look at any in the gender pay gap thread. You toss **** out without even looking at it, because you're biased against conservative media and conservatives like I expected. Now it's obvious, you're quite literally just a liberal mouthpiece and not concerned with constructive dialogue in any way.
Problem is no one has shown proof that she worked for Fusion or even asked Fusion about it.
07-13-2017 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
LOL. That is how it works. You can't convict someone without factual evidence.

No evidence, no crime. In the eyes of the law.

Until evidence is produced that proves a crime was committed, then nobody is guilty of a crime.
And I for one am sickened by how the media has treated OJ simpson.
07-13-2017 , 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisGunBGud
Like you were told above that's not how this works. Now let's raise our maturity level and avoid answering a question with a question. I'm not talking about Trump right now. I'm asking about what you mean by evidence when you mentioned it above? Be careful in your answer, your response already proves to me you know this but I'm simply looking out for you.

So evidence, define it for me please...
So, you are going to insult me and then expect me to answer your questions.

Well, that's not how that works.
07-13-2017 , 10:39 PM
The "best" supporters.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...story,amp.html

Quote:
An Airbnb host who canceled a woman’s reservation because of her race has agreed to pay $5,000 in damages and take a course in Asian American studies, a state regulatory agency announced Thursday.

The host, Tami Barker, told the woman who reserved her Big Bear cabin for a ski vacation in February that she would not rent to an Asian, justifying the action by adding in a text message, “It’s why we have Trump,” referring to President Trump.
07-13-2017 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
So, you are going to insult me and then expect me to answer your questions.

Well, that's not how that works.
Keep finding a reason to not answer it. Stage is still yours. It's a simple question. Sweet dreams.
07-13-2017 , 11:09 PM
OJ did it.
07-13-2017 , 11:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
calm down
Corvette, I have deleted this content and some of your other posts for being abusive and threatening. Replies quoting them have been edited (or deleted where they had NC) as well.

Please don't post that way again.

Last edited by chezlaw; 07-14-2017 at 08:28 AM.
07-13-2017 , 11:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey



What the hell is "kek"?


Kek means LOL. It originated from World of Warcraft.
07-13-2017 , 11:39 PM
We are in our deplorable hole.
07-13-2017 , 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corvette24
They probably are, I just don't care anymore. If they aren't, they are exactly what is wrong with this country. We don't have years, or even months, to right all of the wrongs that have been done before we are just another authoritarian dictatorship. It starts with these ****ing idiots. They need to crawl back in their deplorable holes.
Winner chicken dinner
07-13-2017 , 11:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corvette24
Deleted for being abusive & threatening


Go off on them. Their nervous laughter ain't trolling, they seem scared ****less you are right.

Last edited by chezlaw; 07-14-2017 at 08:33 AM.
07-13-2017 , 11:47 PM
Our big strong leader gets a challenge. How does he respond?

Trump Backed Off Putin Because ‘What Do You Do? End Up in a Fistfight?’

Quote:
President Trump said on Wednesday that he had confronted President Vladimir V. Putin twice about whether Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election, and changed the subject after Mr. Putin flatly denied it because, “What do you do? End up in a fistfight?”

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One as he flew to Paris to take part in Bastille Day celebrations, Mr. Trump offered his first extended account of a dramatic closed-door meeting he held with Mr. Putin last week in Hamburg, Germany.

“I said to him, ‘Were you involved in the meddling with the election?’” Mr. Trump recalled. “He said, ‘Absolutely not. I was not involved.’ He was very strong on it. I then said to him, in a totally different way, ‘Were you involved with the meddling?’ He said, ‘I was not — absolutely not.’”
So much winning, the best negotiator
07-13-2017 , 11:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Go off on them. Their nervous laughter ain't trolling, they seem scared ****less you are right.
If you support the biggest psycho in the thread does that make you a psycho?

      
m