Don Jr. has said in the past year he never met with Russians as part of the campaign, which we now know to be lies. Not long after this meeting we just learned about he went on CNN and called the idea that Russians would want to help Trump "phony".

These posts should be seen together

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Sarsour

its possible that trump has done things good for corporations, thats a massive web. the point is he isn't a corporate lapdog, like Obama. ruminating about this minutia is missing the point. He took very little corporate money and has not bailed anyone out.

Its clear to see that trump is fulfilling his promises

the wall, check
the best 2a president, check
no signing bad deals like tpp and paris accords, check

he is clearly a better president than Obama and Bush

Huh? In your narrative you're defending Don Jr. for wanting to take info from the Russians because he's the only safe place they can go, or something (it doesn't make the most sense but I'm trying to work with you)

i thought the point of an alt-right forum was that facts shouldn't matter?

I'm not even Muslim and I know jihad means struggle to Muslims. I am familiar with struggle as a shareable value. Struggle can be entirely without violence.

The wall is nyet a check

Saying 'nothing' repeatedly has already been served and it is now stale meat on bread.

Yeah that's fine if that's what this is. I peeked in the rules post and saw a citations stipulation.

Not even sure how I ended up sub'd to a thread here. Maybe a post got moved or something. Wont be around long if it's just about arguing with meatsticks.

$1.6 Billion in funding from the House http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...utm_medium=RSS

I'm aware of what you make. I'll make more than you next year and every year after. And no state income tax. And I'm younger. lol William!

If the citations have already been provided, asking for them again does not an argument make.

whatabout ____ isn't an argument. or maybe it is here, idk. no critically thinking person would believe don jr is being honest now after lying about this subject so many times for so long. this story he's telling now is his most acceptable version of events, and it's plainly stated in the emails he published that he was offered something illegal and he jumped at the opportunity, invited the top campaign officials and attended the private secret meeting. so best case scenario BEST for don jr is he's just confessed to conspiracy to commit a felony and that's as far as it goes. that's if what he's saying now is the truth and it turns out actually nothing came from the meeting, even though we know russia hacked the dnc and podesta and released the contents through wikileaks after this, all of which trump used for direct political gain every day at his rallies. "I LOVE WIKILEAKS!" "DID YOU SEE TODAY'S WIKILEAKS?!"

lol

money has already been allocated for the wall, if the senate wants to stonewall it Trump will for sure fight for it

the wall as of right now is a promise fulfilled

There were no citations provided that backed up the claims. Such citations have been requested. If you make the claims again without providing proper citation, it's apparently grounds for banning you. *ball to you*

We are talking a lot of hypotheticals here.

What should that Russian lawyer have done with information proving Hillary was colluding with Russia? Note - this lawyer had already been denied a visa by the Government we would presume she should have turned that information over to.

He was not offered something illegal:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/11/opinio...lan/index.html

Proof of Clinton colluding with Russia is not illegal information.

Read the thread. I can't help you.

Gone to the public, under your silly hypothetical.

To the New York "we are recommitting ourselves to journalism after being in the tank for Hillary" Times perhaps?

At least we have you on record of supporting leaking emails to WikiLeaks. Thanks!

Go cower behind your walls, all submissive and compliant to foreign Russians.

Mixed bag, actually

Maybe if you say it enough it will become true!

You have an idiotic definition of "promise fulfilled" if you think a bill that just made it out of committee in only one of the two houses of Congress means "promise fulfilled". This is like calling Obamacare replacement "promise fulfilled" before the House even voted on the AHCA!

Wow, I guess you got him good there, no possible way to leak to any media at all.

Your in the wrong forum. Only nerds ban people.

You called me obtuse.

Why would they go to an organization if they felt it was corrupt? Is there no other possible way to get the info out?