I have made 2 predictions of things that people here or in alpha thought were a big deal that turned into absolutely nothing and I am ready to make my third. This whole 'the trump team talked to a big bad russian guy and he said hillary is a meany face (or whatever the supposed dirt was)' will turn into absolutely nothing and the liberal media will move on within the next 4 months and find something else negative to say about GOATrump.

FYI- My earlier prediction were that OWS & BLM would fizzle away within months and accomplish absolutely nothing.

You should keep saying this to yourself. Especially should she attempt to run again.

I thought we were against starting conflicts for no reason. Has the Left changed its tune?



Because you live in a one variable world? I don't know how you manage that, but good luck to you.


Politically, it's shady - like all campaigns. Especially in a one-variable world. When you consider what their opponent was doing, this doesn't even register - even if Don Sr. were implicated.

How exactly does the gay marriage comment and what I wrote in this post interconnect?

By the end of summer, the media narrative will be "Effective, but we don't like it." Just wait....the turn is coming, if the MSM doesn't self-immolate before then.

Hmm, a bold assertion from legal scholar BroadwaySushy. OTOH, associate dean at Cornell Law:

They're both instances of you being an incredibly stupid person in just the last 24 hrs

End of story
End of story
End of story
End of story
End of story
End of story

That article discusses a different law from the one I brought up. It's certainly possible that the conspiracy law is a better angle than the contributions law.

He wasn't asking for anything. He showed up to see what she was offering. That's not asking and it's not soliciting.

Only a fool would call that soliciting.

lol . I'm sure they would have talked openly about hacking the DNC in emails.

Also lol at you running to stupid conspiracy theories when daddy and juniordaddy get in trouble.

You are assuming that Jr. is finally telling the truth. lol at you.

I mean, if she runs again she will be relevant again.


Dude, what, like:

1. I don't purport to represent "the left", only myself so I don't know?
2. They are two separate topics. My opinion of a conflict doesn't change whether it exists or not.


No, like, dude, Trump is relevant because he won. Hillary is not relevant because she lost.

If your argument is supposed to be "Hillary did all these terrible things that were even worse that forced Trump to collude with Russia" then fine, if you find evidence of that too, throw them all in jail.

Forgive me if I find Trump more pressing given that he is currently in control of our government.

lol

There appear to be quite a few legal experts who disagree. I concede that I think it's ambiguous but it's also quite clear that the law intends to prohibit the kind of behavior that DJT was engaging in when he took the meeting. We'll see what happens.

All the non-American trump supporters ITT have another country they put first.

Let me get this straight. You are on the internet all day every day and spend nearly your entire life arguing with 3 or 4 people whom you don't know.

I am not gay, I do not keep up with current gay news.

I have a life, I do many other things.

Now who is the stupid one?

You post in a political forum every day and don't know even the slightest bit about political news dumbass

What behavior? He showed up to a meeting with a person who was offering some unknown, unverified information that might or might not be pertinent to the election campaign.

But yeah, we'll see what happens. I've already made my prediction.

This just looks bad. That's it. Nothing will happen because too many things need to be proved and DJT will certainly be coached up well.

58,738

And we always go back to the child molester. They were just showing up to see what was being offered making sure the kid was okay right? Give me a break guy. It's one thing to go down with the ship, it's another thing to slit your wrists as you go down with the ship. I mean come on guy.

My guess would be the behavior known as criminal conspiracy.

A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion

The nature of the information being offered was not unknown, as you state. Junior was interested in moving forward, hence agreeing to the meeting.

Trump supporter gets painted into a corner and then says Hillary followed by some words. It's one of their last cards in the deck. What happens when that card wears out though guys?

Sushy why'd you delete your post?

Lol. The only thing they agreed to, was to meet.

It's like that moment in everyones lives where they realize they are on their own and their parents aren't gonna take care of them anymore. I call it the 'maturity moment.'

There will come a point in everyones lives where the government is not capable of taking care of you anymore, and people will have to either step into the real world or die. That's the reckoning I wish on liberals.

The statute talks about contributions of value. It has never been used to go after anyone for meetings or information. Every campaign sets meetings up with foreign leaders, then includes those in press releases or brags about them. By doing so they also are saying that has value. Is that a violation?

Every campaign does oppo research, we also know that under this statute you can not launder those things of value, so if the oppo research includes information from a foreign person it would have to violate the statute? This would lead to a very stupid interpretation and would have to lead to a whole other list of disclosures a campaign would have to make. No way this a reasonable interpretation. The left is trying to shoe horn something to fit.

I would agree with the following interpretation:

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/no-t...ussian-lawyer/