Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

07-09-2017 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
not every piece of regulation is good for big buisness obv, the point is pointing to trump lowering regulation as evidence for him being in the pocket of large corporations is wrong. Theres many regulations which end up benefiting large corporations by stifling competition.
You asked what Trump has done to benefit corporations, though, and the answer is clearly that some of the things he's done have done so. Huehuecoyotl posted the best example yet, which you didn't respond to - overturning Obama's overtime rule has nothing to do with barrier to entry or entrenching market position, unless you get so reductionist that you argue anything requiring businesses to pay employees is a "barrier to entry" (might as well outlaw unions at that point). You're already kinda there by suggesting that worker safety regulations are #actually a huge burden to medium sized businesses, rather than providing a benefit to the working class that Trump allegedly fights for.

I'm open to some of your argument and I've been persuaded a little that not all regulations are fully anti-corporate. However, I think you have a bit more work to do beyond blind assertions and a handful of J&J stock to prove that big pharma companies prefer a system that you admit costs them billions in the outset.

I'd add that the other thing you noted in their benefit - that they can charge tons of $$ here - has more to do with our healthcare system and less to do with the safety regulations that make bringing a drug to market so expensive.
07-10-2017 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
Extremely lengthy exchange that went all the way up to post #2900+, and you defended the study multiple times, including this back-and-forth (#2863)



followed by
Haha wow. For better linkage:

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
For the people who have been following Wil making a fool of himself today, the link he found that made himself so sure that gay men have thousands of partners....is an anonymous message board thread, on a forum much, much smaller than 2p2.

He didn't elect to share this because it's ****ing embarrassing, obviously.
I stand by my statements and I'd invite you to bring gay men into this thread to discuss it. There are many gay message boards out there. Go read them.

It is no question, without a doubt, a total slam dunk that I am correct on this topic. Go read them yourself. It's literally spelled out to you on those boards.

Report back with results.
Amazing, lolwil, still undefeated
07-10-2017 , 12:15 AM
btw the "still undefeated" meme that I like to apply to make fun of wil led me to a couple more instances where he was proven wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Yes, I admit I mistakenly thought Original Position's post was yours
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
It's not at all. When Trump's administration has a leak it's patriotism. When Obama had a leak it was treasonous (Valerie Plame).
in b4 "NO BETS THO"
07-10-2017 , 12:25 AM
Hey goofy, did you see the French president scurry over to stand next to President Trump at the photo shoot? They can't get enough of him.

Boy, what an impact he is having on the world stage.
07-10-2017 , 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Hey goofy, did you see the French president scurry over to stand next to President Trump at the photo shoot? They can't get enough of him.

Boy, what an impact he is having on the world stage.
Macron is awesome. He stood next to Putin and slammed him for ****ing with their election (contrast that with Trump meeting Putin and being like "Putin said he didn't do anything, I believe him"), and when Trump withdrew from the Paris accord he gave a speech in better English than Trump can speak telling intelligent Americans they have a home in France and to make the planet great again.

Trump is giving up America's role in global leadership and Macron is smart enough to try to grab what pieces of it he can before China takes it all.
07-10-2017 , 12:41 AM
LOL no. Macron looks up to Trump. He's like his hero.

You could tell by the way he just had to stand beside him. He was like a little puppy looking at his master.
07-10-2017 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
LOL no. Macron looks up to Trump. He's like his hero.
From the gift Trump handed him in withdrawing from Paris, that might be true!
07-10-2017 , 12:53 AM
I couldn't
07-10-2017 , 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Who judges what situations are worse? Please, rank them in order so we can all be enlightened as to what is REALLY hard to overcome compared to just a little sadness? I can't wait for your response.
I can't imagine why you'd think it's necessary to quantify or rank all the ways that people can be disadvantaged in life to acknowledge that some people have it easier than others.


Quote:
This is a huge misconception. Not many people "coast", and those that do almost always make their situations start down a negative path. Without personal responsibility and at least some dedication things go bad relatively quickly.
"Almost no one is successful without hard work" is lol unless you're equating hard work with putting time and effort into something. All things take some sacrifice - that doesn't mean the work:reward ratio will be the same.

Quote:
It's the reason why rich idiots become broke very quickly, when people like you believe they "coast". Almost no one does. This is why “shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in three generations” is an actual saying and carries across cultures.
Rich idiots don't go broke because of their work ethic, they go broke because they're idiots. The world is filled with hard working idiots too some of whom make a lot of money. You think they were walking down the street one day and decided to go down their career path? Or maybe.... just maybe that things happen for a reason?
07-10-2017 , 01:02 AM
% of rich idiots who go broke < % of less rich idiots who go broker
07-10-2017 , 01:25 AM
98% of the time I start here in wnRAF and then read the main P forum, because doing the opposite is completely jarring.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I don't see how a reasonable person can hold this position. CNN is absolutely pushing a false narrative. If you are trying to argue that the particular stories aren't "fake", then I may be able to see that. The overall narrative, however, is without question an utter joke.

From what I can tell CNN will see a backlash against them very shortly. Trump will defeat yet another opponent.

**** CNN. Complete garbage, and an example of why being dishonest and manipulative in the end hurts no one but yourself. I hope the entire network implodes.

Anyone here defending them should be looked at with suspicion. They are indefensible at this point.
07-10-2017 , 01:26 AM
I hope somebody told this simple mother****er that the bolded is exactly the point.
07-10-2017 , 01:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
lmao this is INCREDIBLE. Trump has done almost nothing he promised during the campaign and he is acting entirely in the interest of corporations! How do people actually wind up believing things like this??
They're stupid.

They're so, so ****ing stupid.
07-10-2017 , 01:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat
It is unfair to borderline libelous to blame Obama for the disaster in the Middle East. He inherited the mess from his predecessor who is squarely to blame for the Middle East fiasco that exists today.



...

This.

It's at the top spot in my Crazy Pills Power Rankings.
07-10-2017 , 01:40 AM
The cause is more that love is blind than stupidity I think, though they are of course also stupid.

Trumpkins are mostly powerless, feeble people (just look at his supporters here) who get off on someone acting the way he does, and are stupid enough to mistake artifice for reality.
07-10-2017 , 01:40 AM
Yeah, both Afghanistan and Iraq were well ****ed by 2008. I recently read a book on Afghanistan (No Good Men Among the Living) and it seems like Afghanistan could have gone a much better direction, but things went pretty stupid almost immediately after the very quick military route of the Taliban.
07-10-2017 , 01:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Hahaha but politics is perfect? Wow, that's a HOT TAKE.
It's also another contradiction of the 'politics don't count' take.

I'm totally The Boy Who Cried Peak Wil.

Like, wtf am I even reading right now?
07-10-2017 , 02:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
The cause is more that love is blind than stupidity I think, though they are of course also stupid.

Trumpkins are mostly powerless, feeble people (just look at his supporters here) who get off on someone acting the way he does, and are stupid enough to mistake artifice for reality.
Right, I mean, that's what we were talking about in regards to mini-trumps the other day but the whole business got spirited away to the LC Thread.
07-10-2017 , 02:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
It's also another contradiction of the 'politics don't count' take.

I'm totally The Boy Who Cried Peak Wil.

Like, wtf am I even reading right now?
I think your problem is that the idea of "peak wil" denies the reality that wil is always at full blast.
07-10-2017 , 02:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Yeah, both Afghanistan and Iraq were well ****ed by 2008. I recently read a book on Afghanistan (No Good Men Among the Living) and it seems like Afghanistan could have gone a much better direction, but things went pretty stupid almost immediately after the very quick military route of the Taliban.
(thanks for the recommendation)

Also, there's this weird mix of disingenuousness and concern trolling where they blame O for the ME when he did exactly what they wanted him to do!

You personally, microbet, have criticized O for his hawkishness, which is pretty much a fact. Some might not call it 'hawkishness' and others might say it he was forced to play a bad hand, that he was hamstrung, et cetera, but the fact is he continued the wars. That is what they wanted, and now somehow O is blamed for the ME being a mess. 'War Is Hell' is the premier phrase but 'War Makes Messes' also works.

It's like this: there's a scene from The Wire where Bunk's wife calls him home to deal with a mouse, basically by any means necessary. So, he fires two shots, one hitting the armoire and the other hitting the mouse. We can't let terrorist mice win.
07-10-2017 , 02:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I think your problem is that the idea of "peak wil" denies the reality that wil is always at full blast.
Even at full throttle though, there has to be, objectively, a Most Ridiculous And Dumb Post/Exchange that can be quantified but somehow it keeps being topped.

p.s. I mean, I'm not exaggerating when I say that with this exchange between you two, 'politics don't count,' his part is one of the dumbest things I've ever read. I don't mean from him, or on 2p2. I mean all things ever.
07-10-2017 , 03:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I think your problem is that the idea of "peak wil" denies the reality that wil is always at full blast.
I laughed pretty hard at this. It echoed through the house.
07-10-2017 , 09:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
btw the "still undefeated" meme that I like to apply to make fun of wil led me to a couple more instances where he was proven wrong


in b4 "NO BETS THO"
This is breathtakingly stupid even for you. I'm human, I misread and make mistakes and typos too.
07-10-2017 , 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbaddabba
I can't imagine why you'd think it's necessary to quantify or rank all the ways that people can be disadvantaged in life to acknowledge that some people have it easier than others.
What do you think my point was? You can't group people in these buckets and simply say "oh these people have it so much easier than these other people" and hold it against one group. We can only look at things as individuals. No where in the world are people born under the same circumstances and there never will be. Disadvantaged? Yeah great. Get on with it or go lay down in the corner and cry.


Quote:
"Almost no one is successful without hard work" is lol unless you're equating hard work with putting time and effort into something. All things take some sacrifice - that doesn't mean the work:reward ratio will be the same.
I never said it was. The work is required somewhere, though, for the vast majority of people.


Quote:
Rich idiots don't go broke because of their work ethic, they go broke because they're idiots. The world is filled with hard working idiots too some of whom make a lot of money. You think they were walking down the street one day and decided to go down their career path? Or maybe.... just maybe that things happen for a reason?[
Rich idiots go broke because they don't put in the work understanding risk and the ventures they enter into. The world is full of smart, unsuccessful people. They are everywhere. What is the difference between them and successful people? Effort.
07-10-2017 , 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
This is breathtakingly stupid even for you. I'm human, I misread and make mistakes and typos too.
Did you ever give up that stuff that sounded like lost cause nonsense?

      
m