Holding a bloody fake head is to punching and kicking a fake head as is punching and kicking a head leads to a bloody head. Wrestling really doesn't have a place in it's scripts for decapitation, like other entertainment formats do.

I've never heard of DL Hughley but he seems to be a giant dumbass.

Oh yeah? So you've simulated decapitation before or are you saying Hughley hasn't simulated decapitation bf is there fore not qualified for bloody head analysis whether you have or not?

Wow, your understanding of the Constitution is deplorable. Try reading the amendments in order.

I thought about this for awhile, but no, the amount of media/democrat hysteria over trump is unprecedented, its daily 24/7 trump is hitler. The way Barry was treated was kid gloves compared to trump.

everything he does is scrutinized, and if it isn't bad they make something up.

Theres a current narrative after russia failed is about the 25th amendment which is completely ridiculous. No other president has been hated so much by the media for no reason.

I didn't' say anything that has to do with the constitution

Man, this is an amazing post to write from someone who accuses others of having "blinders".

You earlier decided "treasonous" was

This perfectly describes many Republicans & right-wing media organizations during Obama's presidency, including Donald Trump who spent years making up lies about where Obama was born.

Either that **** is "treasonous" or it isn't. It doesn't all of a sudden get more valid because your feelings get extra hurt about the specific amount of criticism Daddy gets compared to his predecessor. Take your blinders off, this is some really special partisan hackery you're engaging in.

25th amendment is called for. Trump has one foot in the Alzheimer's ward. We need to ridicule him much as possible before it becomes unseemly.

I've seen every keith obermann resistance video made this year so no I am not triggered by people insulting trump.

Trump got eviscerate for birtherism, meanwhile calling trump orange hitler is applauded today. Idk how to convince you that Trump is being completely slandered by the press in an unprecedented way but its pretty self evident.

1 year into barrack or W's term there wasn't wall to wall demonization of those 2 people, not 10% as much as trump. CNN has 93% negative coverage of trump, that is objective and not partisan at all.

thats a joke and you know it, and it makes democrats and media who push this look like a joke.

There's so much stupid going on here that it's hard to address it all, so maybe the simplest way is to just look at this one part that expresses the idea your argument hinges on:

"Treasonous" is not the difference between 92% and 93%, nor between X% and X+1% at any level. "Treasonous" is a word that means something and you have clearly lost sight of what that is in your anti-CNN rage.

Again, you said treason is lying and undermining the president (which is a hilarious state-slobbering definition to begin with that hearkens back to GWB-era "you do not criticize the president during times of war" garbage), and there's a reason you're shifting those goalposts miles downfield to suddenly pretend like it's #actually about how much lying and undermining is taking place, Republican levels are totally not treason but Democrats, wow, much treasonous, very treason.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sn...siness_of_Life
Incredible.

Attempting to delegitimize the legitimate President of the United States is treasonous. I hope there are investigations.

Any rational person would conclude that it is just as criminal as a foreign power influencing an election.

No, it's not. In fact it's probably the singularly most important form of protected speech under the constitution, and foundational to the very possibility of Democracy.

This was true when Republicans spent eight years doing it with Obama and it's true now.

There won't be any investigations.

Who wants to bet that dumbass partisan JiggyMac also has very nuanced distinctions that suddenly appear in this definition when you ask him if it's treasonous for Fox News or Donald Trump to be "attempting to delegitimize [sic] the legitimate President of the United States"?

There is a difference between disagreement and delegitimization.

Saying "your policy sucks" is different from "you are not the rightfully elected President".

You're a traitor. You wouldn't know how to invoke an amendment to the Constitution if you had Nine Supreme Court justices as your legal counsel.

Hmmmmm like "you were born in Kenya and thus are not constitutionally eligible to be President"? Kinda like that?

Is it different than saying you were born in Kenya?

One of these statements is true and both are acts of aggression against this country:

1) A foreign power colluded with a candidate to change the outcome of an election.

2) An organized movement to sow doubt into the mind that a legitimate President was elected.

Since we only have evidence of #2, you have to agree that the odds are that certain these organizations and their propaganda have made themselves enemies of this country.

This is false (edit: with regard to treason and the 1st amendment). When Trump, Dinesh D'Souza and others spent years saying that Obama was not the rightfully elected president because he wasn't a natural born citizen they were not committing treason.

Note that I think Trump was legitimately elected president, so I would disagree with anyone who claimed that he is illegitimate in this sense, but they likewise would not be committing treason. Additionally, I am not aware of any news outlets which are claiming that Trump is illegitimate in this sense either, so it seems like a strange distinction to try to make.

I believe the correct deflection here is "Clinton isn't President, Trump is...". Isn't that how the Leftists do it?

Fox, Rush Limbaugh and the rights AM radio talking heads did this for eight years and you were ok with it. Suck it up.

Or make a trade....all of them who fit get treason for CNN...?

To suggest Trump colluded with Russia is to suggest he is illegitimate.

I don't think Trump was committing treason when he was calling Obama's birth certificate into question, but you do.