I know very little about either, except for what I read in headlines and some articles. May's rhetoric sounds much better to me than Khan's.

More feelings, biases and prejudices in the place of facts and substance, then.

I should not have said "conservatives", you are correct. Nawaz speaks out against radical Islam in many ways and usually does the news circuit after any terrorist attacks. He is not an apologist.

Poll: by a 59-28 margin, Americans oppose Trump's withdrawal from Paris accord

So if you are fine with basing your opinions and strong beliefs on article headlines and blips of some articles, why are you also fine with people like Trump jumping to conclusions and making statements of fact about things they are grossly uninformed about? Doesn't it concern you that they may mislead people that may not go out of their way to followup on whatever stories they are fortifying their beliefs with? So you're saying it DOES matter what he says? Ok, just making sure we're clear.

But he is fine with Trump jumping to conclusions and making statements of fact about things that he's grossly uninformed about, because he represents a narrow far right anti-poor, anti-minorities agenda that wil likes:

its sick that you guys care more about trumps incendiary talk than people dying to Islamic terrorism

It's sick that, for political reasons, you care more about people dying to Islamic terrorism than people dying for other, more preventable reasons.

This means nothing.


I care more about the people dying from the lefts acceptance of terrorism.

This is a colossally stupid thing to say.

You can detect care at such precise levels through the internet? Nah, that's just one of the lamest kind of arguments possible. Kudos for dropping it like it's hot.

are you being intentionally being dense wtf, when is an observation an argument and when did a statement like that require precision

please be a little smart before you try to make gotcha posts

I understand. I would always let you go if I did ever get you. Because I care. See I told you I care, so you don't hafta guess.

tick tock said the clock

How many islamic Terrorist attacks in the US have there been since Trump was elected...Tick Tock!

Do you get the feeling Britain wishes Trump was their Leader

No one does, and stop trolling.

A week or so ago we were talking about regulation and how burdensome it is in the US.

"His (Obama) regulatory onslaught pushed the total number of pages in the Federal Register — the government's regulatory bible — to 95,894 total pages, the highest level in history and a 19% gain from 2015's 80,260 pages.

And it's even worse than it seems. During his tenure, Obama imposed 685 "major" rules, or rules that have a significant impact and cost at least $100 million, 36% higher than President Bush's 505 major rules.

The cost of this is immense. For all of 2016, federal regulations cost the economy some $1.963 trillion, or about 10% of U.S. GDP, which CEI calls a "hidden tax" on citizens amounting to $15,000 per household per year. In case you don't know, you pay this tax each and every year, whether the rules benefit you or not."

"A study by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, however, found that regulation has a major negative impact on the economy by distorting investment decisions of firms. That study estimated that if the regulatory burden had remained unchanged from 1980 to 2012, the U.S. economy would have been 25% larger, a difference of $4 trillion a year in output."

http://www.investors.com/politics/ed...regulating-it/

See previous quotes on "regulations"

At what point do you think Germany, France, UK etc will start to consider they have made a huge mistake allowing these people into their countries. If Trump was the leader of any of these countries do you think this nonsense would be happening?

At what point will people like you realize you enable the terrorists all because of your need to be open and welcoming to all.

"The selfish attempt to heal a broken soul invites the evil that may kill you all"

-Mongidig

Do you actually know what you mean by "these people"?

Please describe them for us.

If you guys remember Trump's $100 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia...

Kinda seems like maybe it doesn't exist?

Sushy, can we get a "FAKE NEWS" ruling on Trump here?

You speak for everyone in Britain, do you?

https://twitter.com/MattLaslo/status/872130756063186944

So much foreign policy winning.

If the context of this doesn't make sense, Trump tweeted:




Reminder that Saudi Arabia exports Wahhabism all over the world and is the home country of nearly all of the 9/11 hijackers, but Donald Trump is taking a victory lap over that country cutting off ties with Qatar, which hosts the largest U.S. base in the Middle East.

There is a 0% chance Donald Trump knew we had a base in Qatar when he tweeted that. I imagine somebody's told him since then.

It was more like a flush draw imo.

come on i mean he's just a bad troll, its not even supposed to make sense