These two states account for about 90% of the loonie left. What Trump did in this election was amazing. Look at all the states he flipped. You folks even had all the actors and musicians on your side. Not to mention way more money. He had the Pussy grabbing incedent, women accusing him of sexual misconduct( you don't here much about that anymore..hmm!), etc etc.

And you still lost....I still get chills.

I don't care if your QB threw for 400 yards. My QB threw for 300 yards and won the game. I'm seriously getting a semi thinking about it.

Anyways, thanks again for bringing up the "She won the popular vote" argument. I love reliving that night.

Citation needed.


Citation needed.

This article featuring many of Donald Trump's famous quotes calling climate change a hoax highlights the particular reasons why his administration is suddenly quite mum on the issue of whether or not the president of the United States believes in climate change:

Only with USA#1's Republican party does one become hesitant to publicly believe in climate change, lest they pay a political price for it

A sample of his past views on the subject:

Oh, absolutely not. Lol @ "impossible to measure with precision". Do you know how statistics​ actually work?

It's the same thing as when looking at all that white racism. They only measure whites and their bias. Why do they never compare it to other racial bias? It's because the only thing that matters to the liberal agenda is the white bias.

Good ole boy network. Lol. GTFO with that crap. Medicine used to be 90%+ male dominated. It's now 50/50. Engineering is dominated by males. Ask yourself why? The patriarchy?

Go look at countries with very few options in societal advancement, like India. Women make up more in the fields that are typically male dominated. Why? Go look at the Nordic countries, where choice is wide open and people may choose whatever they wish and be relatively fine in terms of outcome. The numbers skew outrageously. It's the exact opposite of what people like you'd expect. Why? What's causing these people to make these choices?

Do you have anything even close to a clue of what you are taking about, or do you just like throwing these ridiculous ideas out there just for the lolz?

What you're saying is absurdly ignorant and blatantly untrue. So much so it's embarrassing.

In leaving the Paris accord, Trump snubbed the business community whose advice he promised to value:

Aside from being a phenomenally stupid decision, it won't help Trump's future relationships with the business community:

And lastly for now, Trump's pulling out leaves a huge opportunity for China to fill a leadership vacuum in the world

Almost everyone here whose ragging on trump has also been critical of hillary, some even more so.

Personally i think people living on boats should have their own electoral representation. I for one am sick of all ye land faring people drowning out their voices just because there's so few of them.

How can you always get it so wrong?

But hey man, I'm a hillbilly at heart. Here's one for the rust-belters.

I think we broke Sushy, or his algorithm messed up, or the shill accounts switched or something - he completely forgot that he already responded to this 3-day-old post! WTF, who does that?

Lot of things happened in the news last week, and it all helped Trump.

The left continues it's meltdown and they cannibalize each other.

Not looking good, "liberals"!

at this point even if you don't like trump you should just bet on his election in 2020. I think its at +550 rn. its just +ev

I don't like Trumps chances but I don't see the democrats winning. The leadership won't do anything but sell this delusional conspiracy theory as the reason they lost. The party is a joke. It's fractured and absurdly dysfunctional. If it were an animal the humane thing to do would be to take a shotgun to it.

For a view of the past week based more in fact and less on how you feel at a given moment in time, you could look at Trump's approval tumbling to new lows, but that doesn't make Trump look good so you will of course dismiss it.

No problem.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/27/o...rump.html?_r=0

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/f...ts-bleak-21510

http://money.cnn.com/2017/03/03/news...obs/index.html

http://www.npr.org/2017/04/23/525044...hares-concerns

No problem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...e_Product_(GSP)

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-mos...vernment/2700/

Conservatives really hate facts, eh?

No, they don't.

And, enjoy your semi, which apparently will go well with being an old, uneducated mope who's been taught by FauxNews to blame all his life failures on blacks/Mexicans/Muslims/feminists/gay marriage/abortion. Don't worry, I'm sure Trump will fix them any day now. Right after he's done with the wall and vanquishing ISIS.

adios is the forum poster version of a poker player that would hit and run heads up tables. He will not be back to respond to those citations, let alone read them.

So, ISIS not defeated, no improvements on healthcare, no wall, no decrease in violence against cops, no economic growth, no imprisonment of Clinton, no coal mining and manufacturing jobs, no religious freedom laws.

He's really hitting it out of the park when it comes to delivering on promises to his base. But hey, as long as they can now add "MAGA!" to their online rants about Obama being a Kenyan Muslim, it was all worth it.

Heh. Its truly funny what you people come up with.

George h bush had one of the highest approval ratings ever and lost the next election to Bill Clinton.

Trump had the worse ratings of all time and became president of the united States.

You'd be better off using their 100 meter dash stats.

Looks like it was in the mid 50s when he lost the election, not like that's crazy high or anything.

This is false, as Trump did not have an approval rating prior to taking office. You're thinking of favorable/unfavorable, which is of course not the same thing.

The only thing that's "truly funny" here is the completely predictable tack you're taking of denying any empirical way to measure whether anything's actually good for Trump; you say it's good for Trump, therefore it is. Any measures that disagree with this are thrown out, because what you feel is what's most important here.

That is, more generally, the GOP's response to any kind of empirical reality it dislikes in a nutshell.

Lol. Dude, do you have any idea what you are talking about? You are talking non-stop nonsense. We are 5 months into Trump's presidency and you're talking about approval ratings, then when I bring up approval ratings you cherry pick the numbers you want. Here ya go, take a long, hard look and please report back with your EXPERT OPINION on what approval ratings at the 5 month mark mean ;

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/pr...cs-trends.aspx

Sure. Lol.


What's truly funny is you lost to this man.

Pretty easily, too. And continue to do so. Let me give you a little hint here, buddy : it's going to get a lot, lot worse for your side.

Heh. That's not even the most telling statistic.

Blue states crush red states in terms of GDP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...GDP_per_capita

21 of 25 states in the bottom half of GDP per capita voted for Trump.

21 of 25 states in the bottom half of GDP per capita have Republican governors.

That's the same page I looked at before making my post, and I didn't cherry pick anything; I correctly cited his approval ratings at the time of the election, since your whole point was "he had good approval ratings and then he lost". His approval ratings were good but not great at the time he lost the election.

If your entire point is simply that a lot can happen before the next election, sure, you're right, and I never disagreed! His ratings might go up, or they might go down, or they might stay the same. But we're getting a bit off track from where we started, which is when you said "the past week of news has all been good for Trump" which is a bit curious to reconcile with the fact that the American public appears to like Trump slightly less, and at a rate lower than any point in his young presidency so far, than they did at the start of the week.

You want to shift the goalposts now to "well that doesn't mean he won't get re-elected" because, as always, you will do and say absolutely anything to avoid looking like you're wrong.

And a lot, lot worse for poor people and a lot, lot worse for Muslims and a lot, lot worse for the environment, to name but three things, all of which you, newly unmasked as a far right supporter, clearly relish.

GHWB saw the economy falter, thus erasing any goodwill he'd earned as a result of a quick Gulf War victory, plus the American public was bound to become bored after 12 straight years of Republican White House occupancy.