Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
LOL Deuces once again that thing where you obviously just skim the headlines. Like when you say "revealed she held different private and public positions" I think you think everyone else shares your inability to click through the headline, you think there were lots of individual positions revealed.
Here's the actual quote that the news articles you're vaguely remembering were about:
Fly you keep saying that I only skim the headlines when you know dam well by this point that I am one of the few here who actually read. are you still pissed for demonstrating that that massive block of text you dumped in the 9/11 thread didn't say what you claimed it did? If I read that then what won't I read? Stop the childish needling. Or do you think you are being clever, like Belichick, "attack the strength"? Either way the insincerity is transparent so you should just stop.
That actual quote indeed says what it says it did. That was from a speech to a bank IIRC. What she was doing, plainly, was reassuring the bankers that, despite what she says to get elected, she will maintain a private position and it is from this position that she will actually govern. In that vein she spoke of Wall street being blamed unfairly (even though no one went to prison or even got un-rich) and her belief in the ability of Wall Street to regulate itself. Those are individual positions revealed, in confidence, which are in direct contrast to her stated positions. She is a confirmed fraud, a fraudster whose actions lead to real consequences for real people. Helping Wall street parasitize the country by being a fraud is deeply morally depraved.
It's sad that the sort of conditioning which leads weak people to accept this depravity works so well on you.
Quote:
She's describing politics, man. Regular ass politics.
She isn't speaking in the abstract. She is talking about herself and those present, her sponsors/controllers. She is reasserting a standing quid pro quo. Or do I have to remind you how much she was paid for those "boiler plate" speeches? 200K for a 45 minute speech is "regular ass politics"? It is an absurdity of high scale corruption. It's the same pattern seen in the Clinton foundation.
There must be no limit to what you will accept from the Clintons. I don't see how you could muster an ounce of self-respect. Was the Clinton's racist drug war also "regular ass politics"? Seems like Obama got elected without pandering to white Southern Racists. There are different approaches to politics. Max corruption is not regular, and even if it was regular (it isn't) that doesn't mean it isn't also morally depraved.