President Trump
03-05-2017
, 08:26 PM
03-05-2017
, 08:31 PM
03-05-2017
, 08:33 PM
03-05-2017
, 08:38 PM
03-05-2017
, 08:43 PM
03-05-2017
, 08:51 PM
03-05-2017
, 09:00 PM
03-05-2017
, 09:12 PM
03-05-2017
, 09:26 PM
03-05-2017
, 09:35 PM
03-05-2017
, 09:53 PM
I mean, he was held in contempt! And not prosecuted due to Obama citing executive privilege.
Holder, the man who refused to prosecute any top executives from the financial institutions responsible for the economic crisis.
Are you aware of Fast and Furious? Do you know people were murdered by these weapons?
Seems like some of those things would have caused plenty of Einbert outrage, and yet not a peep?
Shocking.
03-05-2017
, 09:59 PM
Quote:
Crazy that I can't seem to find a single post from you upset about Eric Holder
I mean, he was held in contempt! And not prosecuted due to Obama citing executive privilege.
Holder, the man who refused to prosecute any top executives from the financial institutions responsible for the economic crisis.
Are you aware of Fast and Furious? Do you know people were murdered by these weapons?
Seems like some of those things would have caused plenty of Einbert outrage, and yet not a peep?
Shocking.
I mean, he was held in contempt! And not prosecuted due to Obama citing executive privilege.
Holder, the man who refused to prosecute any top executives from the financial institutions responsible for the economic crisis.
Are you aware of Fast and Furious? Do you know people were murdered by these weapons?
Seems like some of those things would have caused plenty of Einbert outrage, and yet not a peep?
Shocking.
Quote:
Whataboutism is a term describing a propaganda technique used by the Soviet Union in its dealings with the Western world during the Cold War. When criticisms were levelled at the Soviet Union, the response would be "What about..." followed by the naming of an event in the Western world.[1][2] It represents a case of tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy),[3] a logical fallacy which attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position, without directly refuting or disproving the opponent's initial argument.
The term describing the technique was popularized in 2008 by Edward Lucas in an article for The Economist. Lucas said that this tactic is observed in the politics of modern Russia, along with this being evidence of a resurgence of Cold War and Soviet-era mentality within Russia's leadership.[1]
The term describing the technique was popularized in 2008 by Edward Lucas in an article for The Economist. Lucas said that this tactic is observed in the politics of modern Russia, along with this being evidence of a resurgence of Cold War and Soviet-era mentality within Russia's leadership.[1]
03-05-2017
, 09:59 PM
03-05-2017
, 10:03 PM
Quote:
Crazy that I can't seem to find a single post from you upset about Eric Holder
I mean, he was held in contempt! And not prosecuted due to Obama citing executive privilege.
Holder, the man who refused to prosecute any top executives from the financial institutions responsible for the economic crisis.
Are you aware of Fast and Furious? Do you know people were murdered by these weapons?
Seems like some of those things would have caused plenty of Einbert outrage, and yet not a peep?
Shocking.
I mean, he was held in contempt! And not prosecuted due to Obama citing executive privilege.
Holder, the man who refused to prosecute any top executives from the financial institutions responsible for the economic crisis.
Are you aware of Fast and Furious? Do you know people were murdered by these weapons?
Seems like some of those things would have caused plenty of Einbert outrage, and yet not a peep?
Shocking.