Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
President Trump President Trump

03-04-2017 , 11:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Sessions has to resign period. He lied to the American people about a matter of national security. His position as Attorney General is untenable.

The joke going around is "The funny thing is that Sessions's answer 'I have not had any communications with the Russians' was an answer to the question 'Hello Mr. Senator, how are you today?'"
That's not going to happen, unless he is charged with perjury. (and found guilty)

Until that time, stating that he committed perjury is just more fake news I'm afraid.

Last edited by BroadwaySushy; 03-04-2017 at 11:11 PM.
03-04-2017 , 11:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
NSFW

https://twitter.com/itsmikebivins/st...65118726725633
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
This is how to voice your opinion in this country. You don't have to act like an animal.
lol mongo
03-04-2017 , 11:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Well, when your opponents are firing fake news and unsubstantiated allegations at you left, right and center then you have a right to fire back.
Lol what
03-04-2017 , 11:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
I don't know what was or wasn't in his mind. Maybe he misunderstood the intent of the question.

After watching the transcript several times and the context of the questions, I think that is a possible scenario.
The part he is in trouble for has nothing to do with the question asked nor the context of the questioning. It was a volunteered non-sequitor.

I guess we are lucky law, order and justice don't require precision of language, comprehension or the ability to ask or answer questions. Otherwise Sessions might not be a good Attorney General.
03-04-2017 , 11:12 PM
03-04-2017 , 11:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
I'm not whining about it.

I'm just saying Trump was having a bit of fun throwing out some "fake" tweets just to stir the pot.

You've got to to remember that he's just trolling the media because of their constant attacks on him.

It's like a game and he's a master at it.
You don't think that is at all inappropriate for the president?
03-04-2017 , 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
You don't think that is at all inappropriate for the president?
Maybe. But that's the way he rolls.

If he gets attacked he fights back hard. And you must admit there has never been a President attacked as much as this guy.
03-05-2017 , 12:16 AM


Twitter can be such a nice tool, but also such a terrible medium.
03-05-2017 , 12:37 AM
The DRUMPF derpisphere is starting to show cracks.
03-05-2017 , 02:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Maybe. But that's the way he rolls.

If he gets attacked he fights back hard. And you must admit there has never been a President attacked as much as this guy.
Because he is factually wrong about so much.

Either way, the green energy movement is moving forward with or without the GOP. And quickly. The progress against the war on drugs will be set back by trump, but the next administration will undo his damage. Society is getting better, with or without conservatives. It's important to be on the right side of history.
03-05-2017 , 03:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Less fake news and more honesty from the mainstream media. Until that happens the game will just carry on, I guess.
Ok, so, trump made those Obama tweets to get the 'media' to stop creating 'fake' news?
03-05-2017 , 03:45 AM
Do these clowns even realize their talk of fake news is a big 'NO U' behind hearing people criticize pizzagate and the like for being fake?
03-05-2017 , 03:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Maybe. But that's the way he rolls.

If he gets attacked he fights back hard. And you must admit there has never been a President attacked as much as this guy.
No and quite frankly based on that statement if I was your son this would be time I took you to a doctor and put you in a home.
03-05-2017 , 05:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
american, and england, and most countries, denied entry to tons of jews. they drastically reduced papers allowing entry. boats full of refugees arrived and were promptly sent back.

the jews who sat in germany waiting for their papers to be processed and accepted into america or england were almost all killed.

super rich jews, and super smart ones like einstein got in. the rest died.
How many Jews live in the united States again?

Also, you are being grossly unfair here, especially in light of the European Union on its way to ending due to their mismanagement when it comes to the refugees now.

It seems you think countries should just throw open their doors and let unlimited amounts of people in. Thay is a disastrous idea. Go look up how many refugees Japan took in.
03-05-2017 , 05:56 AM
The EU has been struggling to keep all its members happy since the bailouts started after 2008, long before the current refugee crisis, fool.

wil: a 100% information-free zone as always.
03-05-2017 , 07:33 AM
Yeah, wil and his derp squad all have me on ignore so they don't know this, but usually I give wil the benefit of the doubt. I'll go with 'ok this dude just doesn't know how to read or write words gooder' before I go with 'ok wtf did he really just type that?'

Because dude literally just typed the holocaust was a better outcome than the swarthy jewry running amok amidst midtown america.
03-05-2017 , 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
The EU has been struggling to keep all its members happy since the bailouts started after 2008, long before the current refugee crisis, fool.

wil: a 100% information-free zone as always.
Bahaha. The EU is dead and everyone knows it. Good riddance. Their arrogance was their own downfall and they deserve it. You keep making those excuses though.
03-05-2017 , 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
How many Jews live in the united States again?

Also, you are being grossly unfair here, especially in light of the European Union on its way to ending due to their mismanagement when it comes to the refugees now.

It seems you think countries should just throw open their doors and let unlimited amounts of people in. Thay is a disastrous idea. Go look up how many refugees Japan took in.
you really should read up on history if you are going to talk about it. the united states actually accepted less jews than in prior years during the holocaust.

and yes, I do think the that the us should have thrown their doors open and accepted as many jews as possible during that time. I think it is absurd to think that would be more disastrous than what happened.
03-05-2017 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
you really should read up on history if you are going to talk about it. the united states actually accepted less jews than in prior years during the holocaust.

and yes, I do think the that the us should have thrown their doors open and accepted as many jews as possible during that time. I think it is absurd to think that would be more disastrous than what happened.
I don't remember anything unreasonable done by the united States during the war in terms of the Jewish people.

Again, how many Jews live in the united States? Also, please list the top 5 countries with Jewish populations so others can come to their own conclusions about who has what.

Lol at the united States having 10 times the number of Jews living and thriving here than the next country behind it and you trying to disparage it.
03-05-2017 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I don't remember anything unreasonable done by the united States during the war in terms of the Jewish people.
thats bc you are clueless and refuse to make any attempt to understand something.

the united states deliberately limited how many jewish refugees could come to the usa during the holocaust.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...m_Nazi_Germany

Quote:
Again, how many Jews live in the united States? Also, please list the top 5 countries with Jewish populations so others can come to their own conclusions about who has what.

Lol at the united States having 10 times the number of Jews living and thriving here than the next country behind it and you trying to disparage it.
none of this matters at all.
03-05-2017 , 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by samsonh
Because he is factually wrong about so much.

Either way, the green energy movement is moving forward with or without the GOP. And quickly. The progress against the war on drugs will be set back by trump, but the next administration will undo his damage. Society is getting better, with or without conservatives. It's important to be on the right side of history.
Almost a half million people have died in the Syrian civil war all under Obamas watch.

Who is on the right side of history?
03-05-2017 , 10:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
thats bc you are clueless and refuse to make any attempt to understand something.

the united states deliberately limited how many jewish refugees could come to the usa during the holocaust.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...m_Nazi_Germany

none of this matters at all.
I'm not clueless about it at all. Maybe you're the one who's clueless. The US government was cautious during that time and it was something they were not used to dealing with. It's super easy to look back and be critical now, knowing all the facts.

Try putting things into context instead of taking the bits and pieces YOU deem "wrong". At the time there was little support by the public for being responsible to accept the refugees and knowledge of the Holocaust wasn't as widespread. When that changed policies started relaxing.

Again, context means something. Stop arguing dishonestly. The united States took in a lot of Jewish people, and yeah, they made some mistakes, but at the time it wasn't unreasonable for the US government to be cautious, with the information they had.

40% of all Jewish people on the planet live here. You think we maybe are welcoming towards them a little bit, in general, or nah?
03-05-2017 , 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
No and quite frankly based on that statement if I was your son this would be time I took you to a doctor and put you in a home.
President Trump is totally trolling all of you and you don't even know it. While you all are back on your hills throwing out fake stories or non stories, Trump is getting things done and following through with campaign promises.

I guarantee you Trump and his staff is laughing their you know whats off behind closed doors.

Did you ever stop and think, how could we have lost this election? You have about 8 years to figure it out.
03-05-2017 , 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I'm not clueless about it at all. Maybe you're the one who's clueless. The US government was cautious during that time and it was something they were not used to dealing with. It's super easy to look back and be critical now, knowing all the facts.

Try putting things into context instead of taking the bits and pieces YOU deem "wrong". At the time there was little support by the public for being responsible to accept the refugees and knowledge of the Holocaust wasn't as widespread. When that changed policies started relaxing.

Again, context means something. Stop arguing dishonestly. The united States took in a lot of Jewish people, and yeah, they made some mistakes, but at the time it wasn't unreasonable for the US government to be cautious, with the information they had.

40% of all Jewish people on the planet live here. You think we maybe are welcoming towards them a little bit, in general, or nah?
This is absolutely correct. I'm glad you mentioned "context". The Regressives just look at raw data, put a frame around it, and thats their story.

During that time,there was a legitimate concern that German spies or terrorists may sneak into this country. Looking back, it appears mistakes were made. In the moment, it may have been the best decision.
03-05-2017 , 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
And one more thing - did you even read the link you posted? Even the Jewish people at that time weren't sure what to make of the news coming out. It took years for them to digest the information. It even says the Jewish editor of the new York times during that period was anti-zionist and limited the articles written to shape public opinion about the Jewish people and the Holocaust. It specifically said he thought all people were hurt, not just the Jews. And HE was jewish!

Again, maybe you're the one who needs to brush up on things and put some perspective on it instead of arguing about something that happened half a century ago when it's easy to make all judgment calls.

      
m