Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Point, Laugh and Chuckle at Gun Nut ******s ITT Point, Laugh and Chuckle at Gun Nut ******s ITT

05-27-2013 , 11:37 PM
We already are imposing that system on you. GJGE
05-27-2013 , 11:37 PM
Last I checked, that system was being imposed all over your ass.
05-27-2013 , 11:38 PM
fu rjoe!
05-27-2013 , 11:38 PM
I know, and it's very very objectionable, and I do not consent.

What is GJGE plz?
05-28-2013 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
You are seriously naive if a murderer would go, "Oh gee, I can't find a gun. I guess I won't kill somebody today."
You are seriously naive if some people don't get into emotionally charged situations and use whatever weapons are close to hand. Equally naive if you don't think guns are more effective at inflicting harm then most other weapons/objects.
05-28-2013 , 09:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
I know, and it's very very objectionable, and I do not consent.

What is GJGE plz?
Except now I hear that you take money from the Government. Sounds like consent to me.
05-28-2013 , 09:59 PM
The government took away my only source of income. Going to college on government grants and loans is perfectly reasonable. And as a matter of fact, I was quite reluctant to do so, but the government ****ing robbed me, so I decided I should.
05-28-2013 , 10:08 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

You are ****ing ******ed. An anarchist on gov't assistance is just too perfect. Stop posting and get a job loser.
05-28-2013 , 10:16 PM
**** yourself ******.

You're a ****ing ****** for NOT being an Anarchist. The US government ****ed us all man. Every ****ing one of us americans on this forum. Because of the US government, online poker was less profitable, less profitable, and then BAM, completely gone.

Some of us would be rich right now if it weren't for the government.
05-28-2013 , 10:47 PM
Maybe, but you're not one of them
05-28-2013 , 10:50 PM
I thought LirvA meant selling drugs.
05-28-2013 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
The government took away my only source of income. Going to college on government grants and loans is perfectly reasonable. And as a matter of fact, I was quite reluctant to do so, but the government ****ing robbed me, so I decided I should.
Nice justification. Personally if I saw somebody get mugged I wouldn't then accept money from the mugger.

But keep ripping up ballots to show your displeasure while not doing a single thing that actually requires personal sacrifice. Hypocrite.
05-29-2013 , 01:44 AM
LirvA confirmed on the government teat?
05-29-2013 , 01:54 AM
Not as much as your Ayn Rands, but yar
06-01-2013 , 09:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
The government took away my only source of income. Going to college on government grants and loans is perfectly reasonable. And as a matter of fact, I was quite reluctant to do so, but the government ****ing robbed me, so I decided I should.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
Nice justification. Personally if I saw somebody get mugged I wouldn't then accept money from the mugger.

But keep ripping up ballots to show your displeasure while not doing a single thing that actually requires personal sacrifice. Hypocrite.


Look dude, I'm a smart person, and I was a good poker player. The actions of the US government cost me, and every other online poker player in the US, money. I'm sure their actions effected the EV of online players in other countries, also. If it weren't for the UIGEA, game profitability wouldn't have declined the way it did, and I could have possibly made a lot of money. I hypothesize that at least a couple posters in this very politics forum would have been millionaires if it weren't for the US government kinking, and then effectively destroying the online poker market in the US.

I tried to make a living playing online poker, and the government ****ed me out of it. You can suck my dick if you think I'm in the wrong by getting loans to go to ****ing college.
06-01-2013 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
I tried to make a living playing online poker, and the government ****ed me out of it. You can suck my dick if you think I'm in the wrong by getting loans to go to ****ing college.
It's anarchist college at least, right?
06-01-2013 , 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
Look dude, I'm a smart person, and I was a good poker player. The actions of the US government cost me, and every other online poker player in the US, money. I'm sure their actions effected the EV of online players in other countries, also. If it weren't for the UIGEA, game profitability wouldn't have declined the way it did, and I could have possibly made a lot of money. I hypothesize that at least a couple posters in this very politics forum would have been millionaires if it weren't for the US government kinking, and then effectively destroying the online poker market in the US.

I tried to make a living playing online poker, and the government ****ed me out of it. You can suck my dick if you think I'm in the wrong by getting loans to go to ****ing college.
The idea that you're a hypocrit for taking govt monies seems to me to be silly on a levels.
06-01-2013 , 11:08 AM
It isnt govt money. They stole it. Remember?
06-01-2013 , 12:05 PM
Oh man. Sorry gun-nuts but forever after "DBJ was your side's biggest proponent" is going to be a thing.
06-01-2013 , 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
this is meaningless

what you are doing is looking at this chart like this - "the more guns people have the more murders there are therefor when people have more guns it causes more murders"

but someone could look at it like this - "the more guns people have the more murders there are therefor when people see high rates of murder they buy more guns in an attempt to defend themselves"

regarding the amount of information you posted these 2 scenarios are exactly equal

therefor you have provided exactly no meaningful evidence to support your claims
06-01-2013 , 01:28 PM
more guns = more crime, more violence, more murder. not just gun murders.
06-01-2013 , 02:38 PM
i typed gun murders instead of gun crime on accident but its 100% meaningless

does more gun ownership cause more crime or does more crime cause more gun ownership?

answer: if the 2 graphs are all op has, he has NO ****ING CLUE
06-01-2013 , 05:26 PM
you know your answer doesn't actually address the preceding question right?
06-01-2013 , 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
Look dude, I'm a smart person, and I was a good poker player. The actions of the US government cost me, and every other online poker player in the US, money. I'm sure their actions effected the EV of online players in other countries, also. If it weren't for the UIGEA, game profitability wouldn't have declined the way it did, and I could have possibly made a lot of money. I hypothesize that at least a couple posters in this very politics forum would have been millionaires if it weren't for the US government kinking, and then effectively destroying the online poker market in the US.

I tried to make a living playing online poker, and the government ****ed me out of it. You can suck my dick if you think I'm in the wrong by getting loans to go to ****ing college.
Too good.

      
m