Gun nuts let innocent people die so they can feel better. They are horrible people with blood on their hands.

SWIMMING POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLS, tho.

LULZ, Riverman, u mad?

Pretty sure everyone who poasts about guns one way or another is mad.

Obama should set up a modern Gestapo to go door to door and collect all the guns and drain all the pools. Just think how many lives he'd save.

In order to be fair, I'd appreciate it if you'd post a "Lives Saved by Guns" graph as well. Thank you.

I think so too. Excluding me of course. I'm nearly always laughing when fighting on the interwebz.

If that graph ever includes George Zimmerman regardless of outcome of his court case it is an invalid graph not worthy of being seen by human eyes. DUCY?

Because you hate Hispanics?

Zimmertard misjudged cos he though he wasnt a pussy. If he wasnt armed he would still be alive even if he was still just as racist because he knew he couldnt have fought Trayvon without a 9mm equaliser on his hip.

The gun didnt save his life. Without the gun he would still be alive because he wouldnt have been a have a go hero trying to stop the black kid from casing houses - which he wasnt, but lets ignore that at his trial cos racism isnt a crime in America.

Well, it's more complicated than that. It's not that gun nuts need the guns to feel safe, obviously **** like background checks or magazine capacity wouldn't change anything if they were just immense cowards. A revolver has all the anti-earthquake and tornado effectiveness an AK does.

(note: they are all, to a "man", immense cowards, but there's more to it)

It's about rank tribalism. They passionately love guns because effete urban elites don't like guns. Why do you think Sarah Palin shows up with a Big Gulp at CPAC? Because she was really thirsty? (why do you think Sarah Palin was even at CPAC? Her grasp of the budget? No, they love Sarah because liberals made fun of her for being dumb)

No matter how much they hate black people(oh and Jesus Christ they really ****ing hate black people), they know they are still the Wrong Kind of White People. And that **** eats at them.

So we get weird **** like random gun nuts celebrating a Senate filibuster. It makes no sense from a policy standpoint. But it makes sense if you understand how much resentment governs the worldview of the modern American redneck.

Eh, you limeys seem free to hate your middle eastern immigrants.

Only fly can make gun control about racism.

DBL and the other gun nuts regularly try to make gun control about racism.

Nah, explaining history is fun rjoe.

That's the difference. I provided alot of citations to historical documents, quotes from legislators in the late 1800s - early 1900's to back my **** up.

Then when the "hundreds of years ago" **** came up, I showed how AND WHY gun control evolved into what we now face through the mid 1960's - early 1980's.

Calling someone racist because they support gun rights is NOT analogous to showing documented proof that a particular law was created for, and is still to this day used, for racist purposes.

I mean essentially that's a lot of words for Fly to say that anyone with a CCW permit hates black people.

If anyone is interested in some actual pointing and laughing, go to the other thread and watch DBL try to explain that science and polls can't be real because he just feels it's wrong.

rjoe science means something bro.

Something obviously different to you than the rest of the world.

And you'll note rjoe did an IMMEDIATE retreat on discussing racism in gun control (and rightfully so, even Fly eventually conceded.)

A few donks sucking their lips because they didn't get their way on an Internet forum doesn't equal "the world".

I'm actually pretty well informed on these polls.

What was the discussion there? That some southern law enforcement officials used gun laws in a racist way a long time ago? What's the point of that discussion? You use it to try to say that every gun control activist is racist. What if I used it to say every southern law enforcement officer was racist? That history would have about the same relevancy on what's going on today in both cases.

Obviously not if you think they're somehow debunked or can't be real because OMG 90%!!!

You're on a computer, find it and read the thread.

But of course LOL no that had nothing to do with it, but just to give you a preview of how far far off you are, the state that is used most readily to demonstrate the racism of US gun control is California.

So LOL on that.