Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters? Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters?

05-24-2013 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
You're easily the biggest pos mod there is. But for the record, forcing someone to take birth control is so obviously heinous I didn't think it needed to be said. So I'm saying it.

Although, I suppose in the event your family was forced to, maybe it wouldnt be such a bad idea after all.
05-24-2013 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
You're easily the biggest pos mod there is. But for the record, forcing someone to take birth control is so obviously heinous I didn't think it needed to be said. So I'm saying it.

Although, I suppose in the event your family was forced to, maybe it wouldnt be such a bad idea after all.
05-24-2013 , 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
You're easily the biggest pos mod there is. But for the record, forcing someone to take birth control is so obviously heinous I didn't think it needed to be said. So I'm saying it.

Although, I suppose in the event your family was forced to, maybe it wouldnt be such a bad idea after all.
LOL

Let me know which of your posts that I quoted you now disagree with.
05-24-2013 , 10:13 PM
Our resident Jewish Supremacist seems mad.
05-24-2013 , 10:15 PM
Quoting for GAMBLORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
i suppose its not an unreasonable leap of logic to make given what i said, but the mitigating circumstance is that these people don't speak hebrew, they come from a world that has no concept of modern medicine, and there's a million of them that need to get acclimated to a modern society of only 7 million in a cost-effective and (just as importantly) time-efficient way.

You can't ask every woman who literally cannot comprehend electricity let alone modern society.

And there's another general question: if you are building a welfare state where taxpayers will support all of the children of people who have no economic value to the state at the moment, does it have some right to take temporary measure to help acclimate and modernize these immigrants?

none at all?

some?

whatever it takes?
05-24-2013 , 10:15 PM
give the PU gun thread like 3 more days and DBJ will be firmly on the top of the non-LirvA Category
05-24-2013 , 10:16 PM
Now this is what I was expecting. Things are looking up ITF.
05-24-2013 , 10:18 PM
To most of you, a bad politics poster is simply a person who has conservative views.
05-24-2013 , 10:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
I am disappointed in Max's contribution to the forum. I have a ton of respect for really smart people and Max could provide much more than attempting to separate RP fans from there monies. Obv this is an attempt to get Max to post more with more effort to your more traditional this dude is horrible.
Max seems to have been extremely reasonable lately.
05-24-2013 , 10:26 PM
Does anyone know if Neil S is paid by Redstate to write for them, or if it is a voluntary thing like a blog which he does for free etc?
05-24-2013 , 10:27 PM
He only does technology posts so I'm assuming he'a paid.
05-24-2013 , 10:28 PM
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, that this thread has more posts than the rest of the forum put together.
05-24-2013 , 10:38 PM
Guys,

In post #170, where Gamblor quotes at me his ABSOLUTE REJECTION of forced and/or uninformed sterilization, that was a post of his from the previous thread. Here's his next post:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
it does nothing of the sort - but it might mean that in certain circumstances where doctrinal medical ethics may not have been followed to the letter, allowances in judgment may be appropriate. But whether or not those allowances should be made in this particular case hasn't been discussed at any length.

what has been discussed - to death - is a particular vindictive interpretation of my original post by posters who haven't acknowledged in the slightest that they may have rushed to judgment and keep repeating the same stupidty over and over, despite 5 pages of clarifications to the contrary.

I'm done. it was a ****ty post, the particular and obnoxiously cemented interpretation of which advanced by people here is completely false and has done nothing but derail this thread, and even though I knew this would happen, I'm doing my best to be forthcoming about my opinions.
Emphasis mine.

A little later we get this pair of gems:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
From the first page:


So everything I've written has been with that assumption - that they agreed to the treatment, but were hesitant about how this new delivery mechanism (I.e. syringes) worked and were cajoled into going through with the treatment they already wanted voluntarily.

Stop lying, you lying liar.

Edit: Maybe you're not lying. Maybe you're just terrible at reading.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
How dense do you have to be not to be able to reconcile those two statements?

The pills they appeared to understand because all you ****ing do is eat them daily and boom no babies. But they didn't get that right and didn't take the pills properly. So they were recommended to take the shots, which were only once every three months. Maybe they needed a little extra push ("I know it hurts, but this will do the same thing as the pills, but you don't need it daily anymore!") Maybe a few of them (say, the 35 women who were interviewed) had trouble getting the extra details and side effects of the Depo. The issue has always been confusion over whether the new consent was fully informed and aware because of language and cultural barriers, but it is obvious they all agreed to take the shots and knew the basic idea of what they were taking.

How is this not completely obvious to you that this has been my position? I just can't believe anyone could be this obtuse.
Spoiler:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
i suppose its not an unreasonable leap of logic to make given what i said, but the mitigating circumstance is that these people don't speak hebrew, they come from a world that has no concept of modern medicine, and there's a million of them that need to get acclimated to a modern society of only 7 million in a cost-effective and (just as importantly) time-efficient way.

You can't ask every woman who literally cannot comprehend electricity let alone modern society.

And there's another general question: if you are building a welfare state where taxpayers will support all of the children of people who have no economic value to the state at the moment, does it have some right to take temporary measure to help acclimate and modernize these immigrants?

none at all?

some?

whatever it takes?
05-24-2013 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofball
give the PU gun thread like 3 more days and DBJ will be firmly on the top of the non-LirvA Category
I'ma let you finish, but the Central Park 5 thread was the Casablanca of bad DBJ postings.
05-24-2013 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Guys,

In post #170, where Gamblor quotes at me his ABSOLUTE REJECTION of forced and/or uninformed sterilization, that was a post of his from the previous thread. Here's his next post:



Emphasis mine.

A little later we get this pair of gems:




05-24-2013 , 10:46 PM
Gamblor is a jewish nazi, basically.
05-24-2013 , 11:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omar Comin
Gamblor is a jewish nazi, basically.
It would be really funny to take a story where Israel does wrong, but switch the story to have Israel be the victims, show it to Gamblor, then see him get outraged, then show him the real story.

He's more of a Zionist Nazi than Jewish Nazi. Slight distinction.
05-24-2013 , 11:17 PM
Too much gamblor itt
05-24-2013 , 11:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofball
give the PU gun thread like 3 more days and DBJ will be firmly on the top of the non-LirvA Category
It's not really a "Gun" thread. It's a butthurt thread.

I have to be a douche to draw the butthurt out sometimes.

There's no point in a gun thread, there's no gun debate. We've won nationally and we're making gains in other places. We've lost a little ground, but the fact that Chicago will soon have a measure of safety is fantastic.

But like I said, if you think I'm losing the thread, you miss the point of the thread.
05-25-2013 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishmonger
He's one of the worst posters on the whole of 2+2. Rape apologist homophobe who thinks of himself as a champion of the oppressed.
I've told Cwocwoc several times in RGT that he's hated all over 2+2, but he insists that some subforums here like him. I just don't see how.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
Oh, I can't believe no one has said it yet, but - David Sklansky.

I know how people love to gather around admin posts and such, but my god, every single one of his threads is so spectacularly awful. the ideas, the logic behind them, just terrible.
And he's not contained to just politics. All over 2+2 he starts threads but doesn't tell anyone what it's really about until like 50 posts in, at which point he expresses his disbelief that no one understood his initial gibberish. How can someone supposedly so intelligent keep making this same mistake over and over again?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
Sards is quickly moving up the ranks with his whole 'omg gay boy scouts leads to sexually charged environments' perv routine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sards
Come on bro, this is a bit harsh. I have some unpopular opinions, but I'm not a dick about it. I don't think that makes me a douchebag. And for the nth time, I don't hate women (or blacks, or gays, etc.)
You think that doctors should be forced to cut off the legs of someone for no reason other than that this person wants their legs cut off. You're right in that you haven't been a dick that I've seen, but your views seem so warped that it's difficult to argue rationally with you.
05-25-2013 , 12:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCollins
It would be really funny to take a story where Israel does wrong, but switch the story to have Israel be the victims, show it to Gamblor, then see him get outraged, then show him the real story.

He's more of a Zionist Nazi than Jewish Nazi. Slight distinction.
I win by Godwin's law. GFY.
05-25-2013 , 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishmonger
Is Case Closed still around or did he collapse under the weight of all that water? He was embarrassingly bad in the Sandy price gouging thread.
I like Case Closed. Without him we wouldn't have FOOOODD DESERTS!! He also never got in an argument he didn't lose badly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TightenUpYMO
To most of you, a bad politics poster is simply a person who has conservative views.
SeattleLou is pretty popular.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Too much gamblor itt
Maybe. But he's the only person that makes me want to suplex a baby after reading his posts.
05-25-2013 , 12:59 AM
Can we has a poll Wookie? I wanna vote! Just put the bad posters on there, you know who they are (DJB). It's no holds Wook! Poll now!

FALCON 2016!

Edit: DjBarrelballschickenBBQYuckYuckGUNZrGREAT
05-25-2013 , 01:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
I am disappointed in Max's contribution to the forum. I have a ton of respect for really smart people and Max could provide much more than attempting to separate RP fans from there monies. Obv this is an attempt to get Max to post more with more effort to your more traditional this dude is horrible.
Come on man!!!! I gotta a real job now, plus three kids... I just don't have the time to troll as much as I could before.

The exact opposite of the thread subject, but Lou is obv the best conservative poster in politards history, right?
05-25-2013 , 01:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
Can we has a poll Wookie? I wanna vote! Just put the bad posters on there, you know who they are (DJB). It's no holds Wook! Poll now!

FALCON 2016!

Edit: DjBarrelballschickenBBQYuckYuckGUNZrGREAT
This guy is like seriously frothy. He needs to hit the Gun Control butthurt containment thread and let it all out imo

      
m