There needs to be a sanctioned format to let Canadian guys work out their aggression. Otherwise we'd have WWIII on our hands.

lol hey if it keeps us safe I'm all for it

Lol what difference does the title make to you? It could be "world peace breaks out" and all you'd do is post the same absurd one-liners. You're like pvn without the gifs

Hint: it's not. I played hockey and I fought a bunch of times. And I had two brown-skinned grandparents. So blow me, Deuces McCrackhead. Nobody gives a **** what your skin colour is. There is (figuratively) a million other variables that separate the two sports, but the only one you see is skin colour... Because you're an idiot.

Psh, and i bet you also believe 9/11 was perpetrated by al quaeda. You sheeple.

I think you're underestimating my gif game. But it's true that pvn's gif game is mega-elite.

It seems to me that baseball and hockey both have fight rules where "if you do x/y/or z then a fight is going to break out basically every time" compared to basketball or football where the fights happen because of emotions more than not.

Yeah but it all goes back to emotions. When whites give in to their base emotions there must have been a good reason we can accept. When blacks do the same it's because they are black. There is a huge race based attribution bias controlling the different reactions to similar behavior.

Omar, so you're saying black people are ruled by their emotions. You ****ing racist.

As a scumbag lawyer and religious fanatic so frothing that your fanaticism compels you to defend apartheid, I am sure you are used to looking at all the insignificant little variables in attempts to confuse issues and justify immorality.

As for me, I'll keep to looking at the things that bear on the truth.

FYP

Deuces, what's your profession?

Deuces isn't totally wrong, just way overstating things with total certainty as usual.

Fighting in hockey is ritualized and voluntary. Typically the guys doing the fighting aren't the same guys that caused whatever beef; they're just the designated goons. You can't fight with someone that doesn't agree to fight you by dropping his gloves and skating away with you. Todd Bertuzzi hit a dude who declined to fight (hurt him really badly) and everyone agreed he was a terrible thug. Also, the fact that they are on skates really limits the amount of damage they can do to one another (imagine guys bombing away like that on a basketball court).

The NBA had Kermit Washington almost kill Rudy Tomjanovich with a punch. They realized the super huge athletic freaks could do a ton of damage to one another very quickly. Also, NBA players are valuable and well known as individuals while hockey players are basically anonymous and we don't really care too much if they get hurt*. Of course, the NBA way overdoes its anti-fighting stuff but that's a different argument.


*Like, I can tell you where Corey Brewer went to college, where he's from, and some stuff about his hobbies, but i couldn't pick Charlie Coyle out of a police lineup if he wasn't wearing his jersey.

Moar Deuces vs. Gamblor please.

Champstone is worse than either. He just doesn't have the volume.

Could we get a hockey-style punch up? Now there's a video I'd pay to see.

hahaha

jeez deuces is soosososo bad.

You missed the best part.

For the better part of 2 years now he's been calling me a religions fanatic. I've never said anything remotely religious and I'm not religious in the slightest. I have no idea where he got it from but I've been playing into it whenever I can. It's fun.

I didn't know you were a religious fanatic.

I can quote Austin 3:16 by memory

I've heard this enough that there must be some truth to it. I find it convenient to take a debate tone instead of a conversational tone most of the time here. I don't usually premise what I say with qualifiers conveying uncertainty such as "I think" or "in my opinion" which I think is redundant and stylistically weak. If I take a position it doesn't mean that it's existentially crucial to my world view and I will defend it to death no matter how many idiot corners it leads me into (oh hi Gamblor). It just means I think that for now but if I am contradicted soundly I will change my mind.

For instance Gamblor is here saying he isn't religious. I got the idea he was from the Israel thread. Maybe he posted too many links from religious zealots or I confused something he said with something someone else said. Plus he is clearly psycho for Israel and I was already inclined to believe he had a religious basis for that since most who are do. It wouldn't have taken much to confuse me there as I was already inclined to believe it. Clearly I am wrong since no religious person would say they weren't religious as it would be against their principles to do so. It actually reflects worse on him that he doesn't have religious indoctrination and weird beliefs as an excuse what he thinks.

Lol? I challenge you to find anyone in the entire history of Israel bull**** in 2p2 who has ever mentioned anything religious- other than condemning Israel's acquiescence to the Islamic Waqf, which, in an actual example of apartheid, insists that only Muslims are permitted to pray on the Temple Mount.

Lololololol


http://www.businessinsider.com/sodastream-recruits-scarlett-johansson-2014-1

Gambloor is just a one-trick pony. He mostly only AIDS's up the Israel threads. Deuces has a wider range. Like, hockey fights are racist --I don't think Gambloor can match that one.