Other than kerowo, who are the abusive moderators? - Page 3 - Politics version 7.0 -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

while we're going off on wild tangents here, I would like to point out the fact that the Libertarians made Obama shut down online poker because they're racists.

Once obama settles the racist southern libertarians down, he will re open the US to online poker. He will then make a new federal law that forces all republicans into slavery, which will subsequently remove bad beats from poker, thus bolstering the civil rights act.

11-04-2015 , 02:36 AM

#52

Gamblor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 14,746

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjoefish

Um, Gamblor has been banned multiple times.

Gamblor has never been banned for racism. Please get your facts straight.

He just calls Deuces names, takes his personal attacks ban, and is back 24 hours later. Rinse, repeat.

11-04-2015 , 02:38 AM

#53

Gamblor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 14,746

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken

It's not quite that simple. He like simpletons like ikestoys because he and his acolytes can copy and paste generic preformed responses that generally work against the ******ed crap ikes serves. That's a fun game for some people I suppose, easy to play and easy to win.

And it's not like other than that he enforces the rules. There are a lot of legitimately bad posters that run afoul of the stated rules who he lets run free. Gamblor is a devout racist who, when he isn't personally attacking posters with insults or wild baseless claims of antisemitism, is dumping plagiarized agitprop and supremacist propaganda into the site. Gamblor has been busted several times doing this and he keeps doing it because he knows wookie will not ban him no matter what, rules be damned. Ikes is another example that I don't even have to go into- we all know the story.

You still post here? Why haven't I seen you around?

11-04-2015 , 07:36 AM

#54

rjoefish

Got Out the Vote

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 31,086

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gamblor

Gamblor has never been banned for racism. Please get your facts straight.

He just calls Deuces names, takes his personal attacks ban, and is back 24 hours later. Rinse, repeat.

Seems like I had my facts straight already.

11-04-2015 , 08:42 AM

#55

Deuces McKracken

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 9,335

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gamblor

You still post here? Why haven't I seen you around?

Israeli lobby hasbara.

Say, does that make me "Christ like"? (forget my atheism for a sec)

11-04-2015 , 08:45 AM

#56

Gamblor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 14,746

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken

Israeli lobby hasbara.

Say, does that make me "Christ like"? (forget my atheism for a sec)

I don't know anything about this "Christ". Sounds like a troublemaker, have the Rolling Stones killed.

11-04-2015 , 08:45 AM

#57

Deuces McKracken

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 9,335

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjoefish

Um, Gamblor has been banned multiple times.

Why no perma ban? He breaks several rules, and does so frequently. Is there some good thing he does to counter his mass of offenses that I am not aware of?

11-04-2015 , 08:47 AM

#58

Gamblor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 14,746

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken

Why no perma ban? He breaks several rules, and does so frequently. Is there some good thing he does to counter his mass of offenses that I am not aware of?

Just one rule actually, so it's probably because the Jews control this website.

11-04-2015 , 08:49 AM

#59

Deuces McKracken

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 9,335

I don't necessarily think Gamblor should be banned btw under what I think are ideal rules, but I think standards should be applied fairly across the board in so much as is possible. I think we can all agree that a poster who would compare Jewish people to feral animals, the way Gamblor did black Ethiopians when defending their sterilization without consent for example, would be swiftly banned.

11-04-2015 , 08:52 AM

#60

Deuces McKracken

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 9,335

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gamblor

Just one rule actually, so it's probably because the Jews control this website.

plagiarism, racism, conspiratarding, and excessive personal attacks are four violations that you have committed many times.

11-04-2015 , 08:53 AM

#61

Deuces McKracken

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 9,335

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrWookie

Here is a post that is totally serious and that is definitely not trolling and that's just a totally valid political opinion I disagree with:

Try defending yourself when you're caught in the act if you want to accept a challenge.

11-04-2015 , 09:10 AM

#62

Gamblor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 14,746

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken

he did no such thing.

11-04-2015 , 09:16 AM

#63

Deuces McKracken

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 9,335

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gamblor

he did no such thing.

There is scarcely a reg who hasn't read where you did and they have pointed back to it many times. I would like tell you that your hasbara technique of repeating what you want people to think over and over will not work, but sadly there are enough weak minded posters/moderators here that you should probably keep plugging away lol

11-04-2015 , 09:26 AM

#64

Gamblor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 14,746

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken

Lol ok sounds good see you in the Israel thread.

11-04-2015 , 03:19 PM

#65

Mr. Muckit

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 1,238

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrWookie

Here is a post that is totally serious and that is definitely not trolling and that's just a totally valid political opinion I disagree with:

^ Wookie, that post you're referencing contains sarcasm. There is a difference between sarcasm and trolling. Again, it is the fact that you disagree with the political opinion being expressed that you seem to view it through a lens of inappropriate trolling behavior.

I mean look at your response that I quoted above. Your statement is sarcastic.... is that trolling? Should you be banned?

11-05-2015 , 10:03 AM

#66

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Muckit

Wookie. If anyone expresses a personal opinion that he doesn't like, then he regards them as trolling/causing trouble. From my experience, he does not base this around whether something is objectively offensive (such as profanity or personal attacks) but whether he personally agrees or disagrees. For instance, if someone types that 'liberals are wrong about x issue' he will delete the post and issue a ban because he is a liberal. If someone types that 'x team is the nut worst' he will delete the post and issue a ban because he is a fan of team x. He will justify this behavior by arrogantly claiming that "anyone who writes that x is not good, is obviously just trolling and must be banned."

When called out for this practice of banning people based on this sort of personal opinion criteria, (which is abusive imo) he points out that this is a private forum, and basically mods can do whatever they see fit.

This more or less aligns with my experience of MrWookie.

BTW the topic of MrWookie's terribleness spilled over into the ' gender myth ' thread. Looking at the DIB example, It's kind of funny mrwookie thinks his collection of simple-minded derisions are an intelligent basis from which to moderate people.

MrWookie is basically a weak critic- like Low Key, but with actual authority. Lol.

11-05-2015 , 10:57 AM

#67

LetsGambool

banned

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 26,568

Yet he somehow hasn't gotten fired as volunteer mod twice LMAO

11-05-2015 , 11:44 AM

#68

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by LetsGambool

Yet he somehow hasn't gotten fired as volunteer mod twice LMAO

Your defense of mrwookie's behavior is an accussation containing deceit by omission about someone else? Your behavior is that of a simpleton, a broken character or both.

Plus you are ass-kissing up to authority once again. By white-knighting like such a simpleton you are going to make mrwookie terribly angry as he seems to hate simpletons as much as you hate illiterates.

Your undertitle should be "Poop-nosed Lying Simpleton" Lol.

11-05-2015 , 11:49 AM

#69

rjoefish

Got Out the Vote

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 31,086

Spank, answer honestly with just a yes or no please, is your first name Katie?

11-05-2015 , 12:22 PM

#70

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjoefish

Spank, answer honestly with just a yes or no please, is your first name Katie?

Why are you asking about my name?

What purpose does your demand for honesty serve?

What qualities about you makes your demands deservingly answerable?

Why are you asking irrelevant questions?

I don't demand or expect any responsive answers to these questions. Feel free to give them a shot.

11-05-2015 , 12:42 PM

#71

LetsGambool

banned

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 26,568

Where was the lie spank? You got ****canned as mod twice.

11-05-2015 , 01:08 PM

#72

rjoefish

Got Out the Vote

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 31,086

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie

Because I want to know if you're also the crazy girl on my facebook.

I knew you probably wouldn't be able to answer with a straight no even though that's the obvious answer.

I said please.

See first response.

Man, that was hard.

11-05-2015 , 01:20 PM

#73

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjoefish

Are you playing the game where you demand or ask me nonsense questions then accuse me of not answering your questions? That is your herd's neurotic, anti-social behavior that has nothing to do with me. I thought you had learned to stop?

Why does criticizing mrwookie and letsgambool provoke such passive aggressive stupidity from you?

Are you guilty by association? Are you an illiterate simpleton hater too? LOL!

11-05-2015 , 01:46 PM

#74

Roonil Wazlib

veteran

Join Date: Feb 2014 Posts: 3,333

You're giving stank troll the attention she wants, which is all she cares about. She knew giving no straight answer would ensure attention kept coming her way, obviously.

11-05-2015 , 02:22 PM

#75

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roonil Wazlib

You're giving stank troll the attention she wants, which is all she cares about. She knew giving no straight answer would ensure attention kept coming her way, obviously.

Do you feel entitled to take control of other people's referential pronouns in the public sphere?

Page 3 of 8

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Last

...

Page 3 of 8

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Last