Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than kerowo, who are the abusive moderators? Other than kerowo, who are the abusive moderators?

10-31-2015 , 04:16 PM
nutshot has been out of line since before he got modded. It's part of his allure.
11-01-2015 , 02:16 PM
I hope Proph gets released from jail soon. This place isn't the same without an AC loon.
11-01-2015 , 05:55 PM
Could the internet somehow be less functional in Liberland?
11-01-2015 , 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
Could the internet somehow be less functional in Liberland?
Well, if we mean under LTism in general... yes, it most certainly would be. LTers are against the core values of the interwebs to begin with. Just ask them about net neutrality. It's exactly the same situation as campaign contribution restrictions... LTers are against that shiz too. Lters are also against the core values of democracy. Under all scenarios, LTers are for privilege... flat out.
11-01-2015 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proph
MrWookie

The creation of this thread is long overdue.
absolutely. Mason demodding him is way overdue. It is not worth browsing 2 + 2 when Wookie is modding.
11-01-2015 , 10:48 PM
Wookie's downright haters are almost certainly the dregs of politics. Probably not a coincidence.
11-02-2015 , 10:32 AM
Which mod ITF has the most haters?
11-02-2015 , 10:35 AM
kero > elliot > rjoe, easily
11-02-2015 , 10:52 AM
In the forum as a whole
11-02-2015 , 11:15 AM
Why hate them?
11-02-2015 , 11:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
In the forum as a whole
On all of two plus two? In the history of unchained? What are you asking?
11-02-2015 , 12:41 PM
From my personal knowledge (aka, not all of 2+2):

Rapini >>> Wookie >>>>> ?
11-02-2015 , 03:48 PM
Pretty sure Rapini is correct for #1. He has some really passionate haters and a lot of volume too. Rare combo of quality and quantity.
11-02-2015 , 03:50 PM
Was inquiring about long time mods, currently active, any sub forum.
11-02-2015 , 05:27 PM
If Rapini is not the most hated mod, then it is probably whoever is the most hated SE mod, due to that being a high-volume forum full of hot take artists.
11-02-2015 , 05:33 PM
Speaking of, I'm really sad there weren't more metsandfins tears in the WS thread today.
11-02-2015 , 05:56 PM
Wookie. If anyone expresses a personal opinion that he doesn't like, then he regards them as trolling/causing trouble. From my experience, he does not base this around whether something is objectively offensive (such as profanity or personal attacks) but whether he personally agrees or disagrees. For instance, if someone types that 'liberals are wrong about x issue' he will delete the post and issue a ban because he is a liberal. If someone types that 'x team is the nut worst' he will delete the post and issue a ban because he is a fan of team x. He will justify this behavior by arrogantly claiming that "anyone who writes that x is not good, is obviously just trolling and must be banned."

When called out for this practice of banning people based on this sort of personal opinion criteria, (which is abusive imo) he points out that this is a private forum, and basically mods can do whatever they see fit.

Last edited by Mr. Muckit; 11-02-2015 at 06:03 PM.
11-02-2015 , 06:25 PM
Yeah, none of that happens
11-02-2015 , 06:54 PM
Yeah, actually it does. Why make it up?
11-03-2015 , 07:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Muckit
Yeah, actually it does. Why make it up?
I lolled a bit reading your post because it was word for word what happened to me last time I was banned. Yay wookie.

Low key just doesnt know anyone it happens to so in his mind its impossible and non existant.
11-03-2015 , 07:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oroku$aki
Wookie's downright haters are almost certainly the dregs of politics. Probably not a coincidence.
If you read less frequent posters you will notice plenty that wookie bans for no valid reason who just aren't known enough to be unpopular. I guess if you defend wookie you might counter that this practice is a justified preemptive ban of a poster that, surely, would have become a dreg over time.

Personally, I like to judge content/posters for myself. I guess some people like others to think for them. To each his own.
11-03-2015 , 08:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Muckit
Wookie. If anyone expresses a personal opinion that he doesn't like, then he regards them as trolling/causing trouble. From my experience, he does not base this around whether something is objectively offensive (such as profanity or personal attacks) but whether he personally agrees or disagrees.
It's not quite that simple. He like simpletons like ikestoys because he and his acolytes can copy and paste generic preformed responses that generally work against the ******ed crap ikes serves. That's a fun game for some people I suppose, easy to play and easy to win.

And it's not like other than that he enforces the rules. There are a lot of legitimately bad posters that run afoul of the stated rules who he lets run free. Gamblor is a devout racist who, when he isn't personally attacking posters with insults or wild baseless claims of antisemitism, is dumping plagiarized agitprop and supremacist propaganda into the site. Gamblor has been busted several times doing this and he keeps doing it because he knows wookie will not ban him no matter what, rules be damned. Ikes is another example that I don't even have to go into- we all know the story.
11-03-2015 , 08:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
I lolled a bit reading your post because it was word for word what happened to me last time I was banned. Yay wookie.

Low key just doesnt know anyone it happens to so in his mind its impossible and non existant.
lol. so true.

Low Key is not aware of a large percentage of his reality.
11-03-2015 , 03:18 PM
It's weird how all these totally should be banned people are sitting here being evidence that Wookie isn't doing what they claim he's doing.
11-03-2015 , 04:38 PM
Um, Gamblor has been banned multiple times.

      
m