Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than the #dudeliterally droolers, Which Politics Posters hate thought diversity? Other than the #dudeliterally droolers, Which Politics Posters hate thought diversity?

11-05-2014 , 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
I don't think being religious is inherently dumb, but I do think opposing gay marriage for religious reasons is an extra helping of dumb over simply opposing gay marriage. If you feel like the sanctity of marriage is threatened, the problem is that you let government get involved in the first place. Try not letting the government stick its fingers in your sanctified pies.
I think its incredible that some people still believe in the sanctity of marriage these days, let alone oppose gay marriage.
A good proportion of those self proclaimed religious folk never seem to worry about the sanctity of their own marriage when it falls apart.
I think religion is just something they use to try to justify their homophobia.
And they never seem to mind insulting other people by insisting that govt take their gods instructions into account when making decisions.

It's the rest of society that should really be pulling govt's fingers out of those sanctified pies imo by insisting that no religion should influence decision making.
11-05-2014 , 07:32 PM
What about someone believing people shouldn't marry rocks, sheep or multiple partners and happens to include same-sex partners on their list for similar reasons?
11-05-2014 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
I think these types of comments make the environment hostile towards people who hold these opinions. I'm hoping to create a thread where alternative views can be shared without shaming.
Understood, and somewhat agree, but enough is enough. Too many people just play nice nice and don't say anything. Personally I'm sick of it.

If you don't think gay people have the right to marry, something is wrong with you. If it's due to your holy book, then something is even more wrong with you.

They are humans. They are the same as everyone else, they just like something different sexually. Get over it. Like Hue said, next topic.
11-05-2014 , 11:11 PM
If you don't think people should be able to marry multiple people and/or their siblings, is there something wrong with you? If you do, is there something wrong with you?

(Fyi, I'm fine with polygamy, incest still creeps me out though.)
11-05-2014 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
If you don't think people should be able to marry multiple people and/or their siblings, is there something wrong with you? If you do, is there something wrong with you?

(Fyi, I'm fine with polygamy, incest still creeps me out though.)
This is more interesting, imo it's completely fine as long as they don't have kids but I could possibly have my mind changed on either parts of that opinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
What about someone believing people shouldn't marry rocks, sheep or multiple partners and happens to include same-sex partners on their list for similar reasons?
List some reasons. I can't think of a reason grouping these things together with gay marriage that wouldn't make me roll my eyes
11-05-2014 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
What about someone believing people shouldn't marry rocks, sheep or multiple partners and happens to include same-sex partners on their list for similar reasons?
Anyone who opposes polygamy is just as bad as someone opposing gay marriage, but rocks and animals is just dumb. Marriage is about family, and rocks and animals simply don't apply. Nobody's letting you take your pet to the hospital either way, and no one's stopping you from taking your rock. The key and obvious place to draw the line is the same as a lot of things. Consenting adults.
11-05-2014 , 11:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyJ
This is more interesting, imo it's completely fine as long as they don't have kids but I could possibly have my mind changed on either parts of that opinion

I don't think our opinions/feelings really matter. If we decide adults should be given equal rights, and we have, then we should let them marry. It's gross for me to think of a brother/sister together sexually (but, surprisingly not two sisters), and similarly it's gross for me to accidentally click on male gay porn (unsurprisingly, not female), but I respect them all as human beings and as consenting adults I believe they should be able to make their own decisions, including marriage.
11-05-2014 , 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
I don't think our opinions/feelings really matter. If we decide adults should be given equal rights, and we have, then we should let them marry. It's gross for me to think of a brother/sister together sexually (but, surprisingly not two sisters), and similarly it's gross for me to accidentally click on male gay porn (unsurprisingly, not female), but I respect them all as human beings and as consenting adults I believe they should be able to make their own decisions, including marriage.
I don't know if this post is agreeing with mine, or disagreeing with the kids part
11-05-2014 , 11:57 PM
Breeding is not the only problem with incest. The power differential is possibly more important. It's too easy for an older male to manipulate a female child (or male for that matter) such that they might be willing at 18, but is such a person really capable of consent? Cousins shouldn't be a problem, but anything closer than that should be out.
11-06-2014 , 12:01 AM
Kids are a different subject. I'm not sure what to make of it really. Hard to tell two consenting adults they can't make a baby, but if there are good odds it will be deformed then perhaps so. They could always adopt or go the surrogate route.

Germany is dealing with this right now. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...ttee-says.html
11-06-2014 , 12:01 AM
is this different from jj's suggestion about op moderated threads?
11-06-2014 , 12:21 AM
I think it's the same, maybe evolved a bit. Ask jj.
11-06-2014 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Breeding is not the only problem with incest. The power differential is possibly more important. It's too easy for an older male to manipulate a female child (or male for that matter) such that they might be willing at 18, but is such a person really capable of consent? Cousins shouldn't be a problem, but anything closer than that should be out.
Hadn't thought about that. Still seems like an adult is and adult is an adult. If there is statutory stuff going on before adulthood, it's another subject. Weird though how we define it in the US. We had an exchange student from Switzerland who lived with us when she was 16. She was in a serious relationship with her 35 year-old tennis coach before she came over, and they're married now. Had their first kid last year. It's funny because she would flirt with me and I was all uncomfortable about it because I was so much older, like 21.

Also, when I lived in Denmark, my 14 year-old host brother would have his girlfriend stay the night. Parents were totally fine with it. I couldn't believe it.
11-06-2014 , 12:42 AM
16 is legal in most of the U.S. except those prudish West Coast states.
11-06-2014 , 03:38 AM
My mother is an odd combination, very liberal and very religious. On the far left side of every issue except gay rights and abortion.
11-06-2014 , 03:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyJ
Seriously? This is the most boring topic ever. Some people are ****** homophobes, and use a bunch of excuses to justify their opinion because it's not acceptable to just straight up be against gays anymore. There might be the occasional moron who is actually against it for some sort of non-hateful reason, super super rare and they are still morons.

Any conversation about this sort of stuff stopped being at all interesting in like 2011


Wow what a arrogant douche bag you are. Why give a long stupid answer if the subject matter stopped being interesting to you since 2011?
What is a non hateful reason to be against gay marriage?

You dont seem very bright SmokeyJ.
11-06-2014 , 05:48 AM
Haha that PU tards thread really got to you huh Johny. Sorry I find homophobes boring, sorry you find such a short answer long. Re: non-hateful reasons, how about you tell me why you're against gay marriage and I'll tell you how hateful it is. I'll tell you right now the bore-rating will be at least 8/10
11-06-2014 , 06:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyJ
This is more interesting, imo it's completely fine as long as they don't have kids but I could possibly have my mind changed on either parts of that opinion



List some reasons. I can't think of a reason grouping these things together with gay marriage that wouldn't make me roll my eyes
Jesus Christ, you think its o.k. to **** your sister? Wtf is wrong with you SmokeyJ?

You said that sometimes people come up with non hateful reasons to be against gay marriage, so I ask again what is a non hateful reason to be against gay marriage?
11-06-2014 , 06:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnyCrash
...so I ask again what is a non hateful reason to be against gay marriage?
There really aren't any.

That's sort of the point, and also why SmokeyJ implied the topic is boring.
11-06-2014 , 08:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
is this different from jj's suggestion about op moderated threads?
It's what its currently evolved into. I'd prefer to see more threads like AsianNits where its special rules that will be enforced ("No talking about racism") rather than its people that aren't allowed to contribute, but this might be an interesting way to go too.

Edit: Green again! Green again!
11-06-2014 , 09:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweep single
My mother is an odd combination, very liberal and very religious. On the far left side of every issue except gay rights and abortion.
That's not really an odd combination. I know a decent number of anti-war, anti-abortion Catholics who fit that description.
11-06-2014 , 10:07 AM
My step mother is among the smartest people I know. Grew up poor as dirt, turned herself into a pHD president of a Catholic university. She can read a book in a few hours and believes in a man in the sky. My calculus professor was religious. There are countless examples of highly intelligent people who believe what I consider nutty things. Take this forum....

Last edited by FoldnDark; 11-06-2014 at 10:14 AM.
11-06-2014 , 10:35 AM
It is kind of astonishing what people do when they believe they have 'super' authority to mind other people's business and intrude on other people's personal relationships. Must of forgotten what they learned in kindergarten about respect and sharing.
11-06-2014 , 11:28 AM
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/id...40226?irpc=932

Quote:
Jews were most likely to support gay marriage, with 83 percent saying they did so, followed by 58 percent of white Roman Catholics and 56 percent of Hispanic Catholics. Among Hispanic Protestants, 46 percent favor allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry and 49 percent oppose it.

By contrast, 59 percent of black Protestants and 69 percent of white evangelical Protestants oppose same-sex marriage.

Nearly three-quarters, or 73 percent, of religiously unaffiliated Americans favor allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally.
11-06-2014 , 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
To me, starting a thread with the explicit purpose of naming and mocking a group of posters and forbidding them from responding is different from setting up rules in the thread. "No personal attacks, and keep the discussion on-topic" is one thing, this is quite another. Excluding posters who don't follow the rules seems fine, just saying poster XYZ can't post is very different. And then setting up a thread where the rules are "Posters X, Y, and Z can't post here, and this thread is for attacking those people" is just absurd. Not something you want in your forum IMO.
GTFO of my thread. Your homophobic, trolling ass is not welcome here.

      
m