Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)? Other than chezlaw, Dueces, DIB, and ikestoys ~ Who are the Bad Politards Posters (v2)?

05-18-2015 , 11:14 AM
All of them !!!1!

Please Note:
Version 2, this was Version 1. Again including both Alta and Baja Politards
05-18-2015 , 11:43 AM
1st
05-18-2015 , 11:54 AM
SmokeyJ
05-18-2015 , 01:22 PM
adios, ctyri, DrChesspain, FlyWf, Gizmo, goofyballer, jjshabado, jmakin, Low Key, MrWookie, Oroku$aki, Paul D, SenorKeeed, SmokeyJ, sweep single, Trolly McTrollson, vajennasguy, zikzak

are all bad posters. Some of them post badly as well.
05-18-2015 , 02:27 PM
chezlaw, Deuces McKracken, DudeImBetter, FoldnDark, ikestoys, Jbrochu, JiggsCasey, JimAfternoon, JohnyCrash, kerowo, King_of_NYC, masque de Z, Peter Porker, SellerD'or, Shame Trolly !!!1!, spanktehbadwookie, sputnik3000, thechef, thekid345

biggest trolls known to the forum, terrible posters, many support and encourage bigotry at every chance, like #teamCockroach
05-18-2015 , 04:10 PM
I see differences in the quality of posters on those two lists. Lol ikestoys and missiledog, you two should have had the heart and commitment to vote yes, korowo too. Spankbot does post less as a mod, but for how long?
05-18-2015 , 04:50 PM
05-18-2015 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barack Trollbama
all of the Trolly gimmicks
**** you!
05-19-2015 , 01:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oroku$aki
I see differences in the quality of posters on those two lists. Lol ikestoys and missiledog, you two should have had the heart and commitment to vote yes, korowo too...
In my defense... IIRC I made the first vote. I also didn't notice the short time span. Basically, I thought the vote would be like 38-2 'yes' w/o me... so I figured I was just making a protest vote. Yeah... I totally sucked at handicapping this one. I'm going to guess jjshabado also figured it was a slam-dunk.

Quote:
... Spankbot does post less as a mod, but for how long?
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
I was very much under the impression he lacked enough agency that he deserved my pity, which he did receive. That is no longer the case. [from the de-mod jj thread ~ ST]
Nah, you can still feel pity for him.

Let's be serious, Teh Jabber-Wookie's metamorphism, culminated with his recent aggressive spamming, wasn't some kinda conscious goal-oriented activity. It's not like he turned it "on" as a means to some ends, then turned it "off" when those ends were accomplished.

He was simply in a frenzied downward spiral of bitter indignant butthurt.

Unexpectedly, almost magically, being re-greened is like the miracle rescue at the darkest hour that is a staple of fiction. All the butthurt is gone, old enemies embrace, and the war (meaning spamming in our case) is over. Fade to black.
05-19-2015 , 06:39 AM
I didn't think it would be a slam dunk because I knew there would be the SMP votes for spank and the people that just want to go against what they view as the popular opinion.
05-19-2015 , 07:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
chezlaw, Deuces McKracken, DudeImBetter, FoldnDark, ikestoys, Jbrochu, JiggsCasey, JimAfternoon, JohnyCrash, kerowo, King_of_NYC, masque de Z, Peter Porker, SellerD'or, Shame Trolly !!!1!, spanktehbadwookie, sputnik3000, thechef, thekid345

biggest trolls known to the forum, terrible posters, many support and encourage bigotry at every chance, like #teamCockroach
Unchained shouldn't have rules other than no blatant racism/bigotry. I thought that was established a long time ago.

But if there is one poster who worked almost as hard as spank to make the forum unreadable in the past couple of months, it might be you.
05-19-2015 , 08:55 AM
Opinions which are "popular" tend to be supported by at least a majority.
05-19-2015 , 09:32 AM
Deuces, there were several "no" votes that were invalid, so yes, you were in the minority.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Unchained shouldn't have rules other than no blatant racism/bigotry. I thought that was established a long time ago.
"Spank is so terrible some sort of action needs to be taken" isn't a rule.

Quote:
But if there is one poster who worked almost as hard as spank to make the forum unreadable in the past couple of months, it might be you.
You must not have been here, but when I stopped engaging him, he carried on. Others engaged him and he carried on. No one engaged him and he carried on.

Like a homeless person standing on a soapbox shouting at no one in general, he carried on.
05-19-2015 , 09:40 AM
You stopped engaging him? I would like to see a 2 week period where you never replied to spank.
05-19-2015 , 09:45 AM
Search function back to being sweet, hot ass, but it's not like you'd believe me if I proved quotes, dates, and evidence. Remember, quoting is lying?
05-19-2015 , 09:55 AM
No, just lying is lying. Like every word out of your mouth. I enjoy quotes, especially when you quote something that demonstrates that you're lying.
05-19-2015 , 12:15 PM
Christ Alex go back to crying about the poor plantation owners, at least that was entertaining.
05-19-2015 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
adios, ctyri, DrChesspain, FlyWf, Gizmo, goofyballer, jjshabado, jmakin, Low Key, MrWookie, Oroku$aki, Paul D, SenorKeeed, SmokeyJ, sweep single, Trolly McTrollson, vajennasguy, zikzak

are all bad posters. Some of them post badly as well.
Pretty devastated I haven't been able to work my way onto chexlaw's bad poster list. I feel like I've wasted my life.
05-19-2015 , 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metaname2
Pretty devastated I haven't been able to work my way onto chexlaw's bad poster list. I feel like I've wasted my life.
You didn't vote for the scummy idea of exiling Spank and you were aware of the thread so sorry you are way off the list.

Even letsgambool puts that lot to shame.
05-19-2015 , 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
I admit the sex life jabs at LK/Giz and digs at Dids' looks were over the line, I apologize and state that I'll stop. By all intents and purposes those behaviors do in fact stop...

[from the old V1 bad posters thread ~ ST]
VG. Those behaviors were cringe-worthy.

Quote:
... Giz tries to discuss the wife business with me. I ask her to stop. To no avail... I legitimately don't understand the decision making process...
Everything isn't a 'decision making process'. Take the high road... those behaviors on your part are history regardless, right? Of course, just IMO. Good luck.
05-19-2015 , 06:40 PM
I don't plan to revert back to that TBH, but am curious about why she would risk having that aversive behavior on my part come back? Like, it was super clear that she didn't like it.
05-19-2015 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
I don't plan to revert back to that TBH, but am curious about why she would risk having that aversive behavior on my part come back? Like, it was super clear that she didn't like it.


Basically.
05-19-2015 , 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
Like a homeless person standing on a soapbox shouting at no one in general, he carried on.
It seems that he has stopped. And you are still carrying on.
05-19-2015 , 07:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
I don't plan to revert back to that TBH, but am curious about why she would risk having that aversive behavior on my part come back? Like, it was super clear that she didn't like it.
That isn't how people work.
05-19-2015 , 08:06 PM
What isn't?

      
m