The term was co-opted by the alt right and the far right, so it has picked up certain connotations. See also "cuck".

You're not speaking for any other OSJers, and you are out of the closet with your anti-SJW-ism... so, the only thing I could possibly be wrong about is guessing you were anti-illuminati. But I guess what you are really saying is that you are pro-illuminati, in a non-ironic way. Never say that coming.

You are talking complete tripe. Your analysis is totally off.

Classic trumpian tactic, accuse others of doing what you're doing. Daddy would be proud.

No it's not.

The "Run amok PC Police", and all it's synonyms like 'SJW', don't identify a coherent group of people, any more than the term 'illuminati' does. This magical alleged power that these run amok-ers use to 'force' others around is indescribable. The whole steaming pile is unfalsifiable, straight out.

The typical method for OSJs is to post some video where some dumb liberals do something dumb, then to extrapolate this behavior to ALL liberals. Thus the SJW label always includes the weirdest, most annoying arguments on the left. But where does the term end? Are all of the women who marched on Washington SJWs? The objective of the OSJs is to smear the outrage over the loud, incorrigible SJW onto the entirety of the left.

It's like the "dumb Obama voter" videos. Interview a bunch of Obama voters. Edit together a gag reel of the dumbest and most obnoxious. Post to Youtube. Jerk off to how dumb liberals are.

And this is certainly not a tactic limited to the right. You see "racist Trump supporters" gag reels too.

So I really don't take the panic against SJWs seriously. Point me to some examples and I'll probably agree that many if not all are unreasonable and annoying. That has zero implications for my own beliefs or for the beliefs of most of the left.

I have posited my analysis in the thread that this thread is crudely parodying. I am not pasting the same information in two different places for anyone's benefit. Talk to me there.

Recommend this thread, which seems to have been set up as a troll and a troll only, is locked.

Yeah, but the folks that were circlejerking to some 'Racist Trump Support' blooper reel aren't now peddling some absurd conspiracy theory. And they're not claiming they really share the OSJers values, and just wanna give them some friendly advice.

Typical OSJer... derail, label & lock. Shut down productive conversation by any means possible.

No need for a second thread.

Sounds like you're "shouting down" this thread.

Seriously, the threads have different topics. The SJW thread assumes the 'truth' of the conspiracy theory, and goes forward from that premise. This thread examines the conspiracy theory in it's mechanics, and discusses why some buy into it's 'truth'.

There is no conspiracy theory. None. Stop talking rubbish.

Raging against SJWs is the surest sign of a stunted person who needs to get off the internet for a few years and actually read books.

You have no idea, lol.

No, just because someone doesn't like SJWs doesn't mean they want the polar opposite of what SJWs want.

Sure there is. It's not a particularly clever conspiracy theory, but that's what it is. It's incoherent, magical, and bottom line unfalsifiable. Just like all conspiracy theories.

It annoys you when I point out that the "Run amok PC Police" doesn't identify a coherent non-empty set of IRL people. You want me to stop talking. What you're not doing is striking: you're not saying you actually can identify such a coherent set. You're just annoyed, and you want me to stop talking.

OTOH, I can identify a coherent non-empty set of IRL people who are OSJers. This is what I'm trying to get at when I'm explaining to you that the two threads have different topics.

Nothing of the sort. Just calling what I see. No conspiracy at all.

Suggest also you watch my video series if you actually want to learn a thing or two.

You say 'no conspiracy'... but still you can't explain it. You can't even begin to explain it. If just one layer of the onion is pulled back... you gotta punt. How this magical 'forcing' comes to be will forever remain a mystery. The reason you can't explain it, as I mentioned, is it don't make a lick-o-sense.

Conspiracy theories are like that.

Nope. I've laid out all my thinking already in those videos and have said I won't be doing it again. If you really want to know, watch them. If you don't, keep saying nonsensical things and making yourself look like a banana. Don't care either way.

If you watch and still have questions or opposition, I will engage you then and only then. Yes, I'm saying you literally have to earn the right to debate me on this.

I'm not debating you. I'm using you as an example. Your inability to explain your theories, even in the slightest, and the lengths you'll go to avoid doing so... that is what is being demonstrated here.

FYI: you'd actually have to explain your theories first. Only then would there be something to debate. So it goes with conspiracy theorists.

Here we got the classic story, with new words. Instead of "shouted down" we got "alarm noise". Like always we have these mythical serious productive conversations about issues that "can never be talked about". This is all so Team#N c.2010 Politarding.

Next we're sure to hear about what a shame it is that all those peeps are going to hang out now a FrontStorm.nazi because that is what SJWers do.

I've explained every theory in my videos, I am not explaining them again.

You are picking deliberatrly extreme and unrepresentative examples to skew the point. It is disingenuous. You are proving nothing and making no point.

Shame trolly obviously has no idea what he's talking about.

He's essentially calling sjws pussiss. I agree.

well ya, obv. but he was acting like there was some scientific evidence out there. I was really hoping to see it. seemed like a super interesting study!

Google the big five personality traits

Are you asking me to educate you or are you arguing i'm wrong with no knowledge on the topic?

I mean, my questions were pretty clear. I am curious about this data proving that sjw have lower testosterone. and I am curious how it can be determined someone is a "beta-male."