Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! The opposition to Social Justice thread !!! The opposition to Social Justice thread

02-16-2017 , 10:02 AM
Also, if wil is going to go to the dictionary, he might want to check out the etymology:

Quote:
late Old English, from Old French cucuault, from cucu ‘cuckoo’ (from the cuckoo's habit of laying its egg in another bird's nest).
So the aspect of a different race/species is present in the term from its very origin. That's why Radix says that "transracial adoption" is "cuckoldry at its essence."
02-16-2017 , 10:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
People here are doing a fantastic job of being triggered by it.
What specific policies does "cuck" perfectly describe?
02-16-2017 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
People here are doing a fantastic job of being triggered by it.
People are also triggered by the term "n*****", "darky", "jungle bunny", fagg**", "kyke" etc etc. Because these are terms also used by white supremacists, which, while they might have innocent eytmological origins are used exclusively to express hatred for a group of people.

Similarly if you start making jokes about quadraplegics in a veterans centre expect to get your head kicked in.
02-16-2017 , 11:03 AM
Lord if you had actually gone to college or ever associated with the educated you wouldn't get dunked on so often. But you didn't, and you don't, so LOL.

Also, and this is just such a towering principle of white guy on the internet-hood, I could've told you morons that you'd eventually try to walk back from rebranding yourself "alt-right" so you probably shouldn't have written all this **** down. None of this **** is ever conducted in secret, since it's primarily a posting-driven political philosophy the record is pretty ****ing open. I

We can read right wing websites too. Liberals in general are far more aware of conservative political rhetoric than conservatives are of liberal, presumably because the inherently higher strength of character of liberals allows them to read that ****, but because the internet white guy is deeply convinced against all evidence of his own superiority, they tell themselves these bizarre stories about how THEY are open-minded and THEY are intellectually curious, so they assume their own level of those traits are at or near the maximum.
02-16-2017 , 11:11 AM
Fly, I routinely own you guys and you just don't have the education or ability to following reasoning enough to see that. I absolutely make mince meat of you in virtually every exchange. Just because you stick together etc. doesn't change any of that. A society of idiots is still just a bunch of idiots no matter how many more idiots you add to it.
02-16-2017 , 11:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBV
Spoiler:
.
02-16-2017 , 11:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I meant it as a serious question. I have no animosity towards you, as I've advocated for you to be let back into this forum. I really wondered what you thought of me.
I think you are a dude from Philly who likes to argue in forums and has a cute kid. Take care!
02-16-2017 , 11:25 AM
Like most nazi schemes, their "insults" only work on those unaware and not even on all of those unaware.
02-16-2017 , 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
Fly, I routinely own you guys and you just don't have the education or ability to following reasoning enough to see that. I absolutely make mince meat of you in virtually every exchange. Just because you stick together etc. doesn't change any of that. A society of idiots is still just a bunch of idiots no matter how many more idiots you add to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
What specific policies does "cuck" perfectly describe?
?
02-16-2017 , 11:27 AM
Any time you make a policy with the express purpose of helping someone other than yourself, when the net benefit is gain for someone else and not gain for you.
02-16-2017 , 11:27 AM
I like how those 2 LordLhgA posts are back to back.
02-16-2017 , 11:28 AM
Man you only ever need to pull the thread a little.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
Any time you make a policy with the express purpose of helping someone other than yourself, when the net benefit is gain for someone else and not gain for you.
02-16-2017 , 11:30 AM
The analogy is perfect because the pleasure that the cuck feels from seeing his wife nailed is the same as the pleasure the virtue signalling SJWs feel when they are all smug and feeling good about about themselves for their "good deed".

It is as perfect an analogy as possible. And it describes you.
02-16-2017 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
Any time you make a policy with the express purpose of helping someone other than yourself, when the net benefit is gain for someone else and not gain for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
The analogy is perfect because the pleasure that the cuck feels from seeing his wife nailed is the same as the pleasure the virtue signalling SJWs feel when they are all smug and feeling good about about themselves for their "good deed".

It is as perfect an analogy as possible. And it describes you.
So what specific policies are you talking about? Why are you dodging that question?
02-16-2017 , 11:37 AM
You need to list out actual policies that people have made and then hold them next to that definition and decide in each case whether or not it is true of them. Look at the list of one's that it is true of, and there's your answer.

I'm not doing that work for you. I've given you general principles, you can derive specifics from that.
02-16-2017 , 11:37 AM
One can tell lord has been scrambling to find something other than "nazi insult" to explain his nazi insults. Like a mental gymnastics maneuver which ends with the head up the ass.
02-16-2017 , 11:39 AM
Not at all. I've actually thought this through and it's obvious none of you geniuses have.
02-16-2017 , 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
You need to list out actual policies that people have made and then hold them next to that definition and decide in each case whether or not it is true of them. Look at the list of one's that it is true of, and there's your answer.

I'm not doing that work for you. I've given you general principles, you can derive specifics from that.
This is about YOUR opinion. Haven't you already thought about this?

You said that "cuck" perfectly describes liberal policies but you can't name a single specific policy? Just name one policy. Why is this so hard for you?
02-16-2017 , 11:44 AM
I don't want to get into specifics, I want only to define the general principle.
02-16-2017 , 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
Not at all. I've actually thought this through and it's obvious none of you geniuses have.
Please speak louder, your head being up your ass muffles your further nazi'splaining.
02-16-2017 , 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
Any time you make a policy with the express purpose of helping someone other than yourself, when the net benefit is gain for someone else and not gain for you.



So, I guess these folks are a buncha cucks.
02-16-2017 , 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
The analogy is perfect because the pleasure that the cuck feels from seeing his wife nailed is the same as the pleasure the virtue signalling SJWs feel when they are all smug and feeling good about about themselves for their "good deed".

It is as perfect an analogy as possible. And it describes you.
I had actually intended to see whether it was possible to have a good faith conversation with you which is why the response in the other thread was taking a while but given this nah **** it.

You're an insecure little **** which is why you brag about achievements that don't really amount to much other than being an annoying little ****, I'm only thankful you posted this in a !!! thread.
02-16-2017 , 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
I cant.
Yea thrashing us in debates with your routine inability to answer simple questions.
02-16-2017 , 11:54 AM
Quote:
Any time you make a policy with the express purpose of helping someone other than yourself, when the net benefit is gain for someone else and not gain for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJvK
You need to list out actual policies that people have made and then hold them next to that definition and decide in each case whether or not it is true of them. Look at the list of one's that it is true of, and there's your answer.
Okay. I went through a list of liberal policies and found none fit that definition.
02-16-2017 , 11:54 AM
An example of a specific policy along the lines I've mentioned would be:

- If you support a trade deal that benefits the farmers of some other nation and hurts your own farmers.

      
m