Why do people like Wil not understand how dictionaries work?

Alt-right even wants to control the racial identity of dicks?

You think I'm alt-right, spank?

I don't care how you use the word Wil. But if I were to look at the history of how the word is used in modern political usage I would undoubtedly notice the underlying racial undertones in how the word evolved and has been used by many people.

You would undoubtedly notice the underlying racial undertones in a Hero sandwich.

I will leave this response to the judgment of the rest of the forum. I actually feel kind of bad that you had to write what you just wrote, because we both know it is a word salad that you hope will get you out of the corner you just painted yourself into.

You are the one with the racial hangups, not me. "Cuck" doesn't imply a minority ****ing my wife, but it does to you. Work on that.

Welcome to the thoughts that the progressives you despise are pretty much born with, and which you think you discovered as if you were clever. This is pretty much a starting point of studying racism and oppression.

Congratulations on being qualified to begin learning what all the "damn liberals" have been hashing out for the last 50 years.

There would seem to be enough resentment to go around as to not really mean anything too particular. When it was said that black people should have the right to vote, that ended up making whites quite resentful. But was that not a legitimate grievance? If so, if it is that voicing any grievance regardless of legitimacy causes resentment, then why worry about resentment?

If you didn't find the joke funny, maybe. ( come on laugh with me)

Seriously though, It's okay in my book if you didn't know that particular aspect of some other folk's sex lives. What was once taboo, became a fetish, then became a porn category. Hopefully we are not in the midst of regressing back to any taboo around inter-racial relationships of any sort.

I meant it as a serious question. I have no animosity towards you, as I've advocated for you to be let back into this forum. I really wondered what you thought of me.

I care about my own sex life only. Other people can have their own sex lives, and I wish them the best with it.

I would think my thoughts on this subject would be understood as long as no one is being hurt. Think, talk, drink, eat, have sex. Not so much in that order, but to each his/her own.

I honestly don't care Wil. I really don't. If you feel it's your duty to exculpate racial overtones out of everything I don't mind. It's not like people snicker at people using the word cuck because of the racial overtones but because, like PUA and 'neg', it indicates a clanish and insular clic of generally terrible people that trades in their own code words.

Wil, your ignorance of the usage doesn't remove the implications the word carries the way people use it in the current climate. Sure the definition of the word remains the same, but using it in the derogatory way people are intending, it DOES carry the weight of racial tones with it. Instead of saying "oh ****, I didn't realize," you ignore the opportunity to make it a learning experience.

No, you really do. I think that's blatantly obvious to everyone who reads our exchange above.

You should think about what you said and work on it. You are the one with racial hang-ups, not me.

wil is so ****ing stupid he doesn't realize that the racialized element of "cuck" as an alt-right insult is coming FROM THE RIGHT, the metaphor is that cuck left-and-moderate whites are letting minorities rape our women by not opposing immigration.

The non-racial cuck is just like, an voyeurism fetish, there's no application to politics. We like to watch other people **** our wives? What does that have to do with taxes or immigration or health care?

Reading, wil! I know books are beyond your grade level but do you read ANYTHING besides 2p2 posts?

I know it's nice to throw a bone once in awhile, but he ain't reading posts either.

During the fur trade of the early 1800s to the late 1840s in the Western United States, the word was spelled "niggur", and is often recorded in literature of the time. George Fredrick Ruxton used it in his "mountain man" lexicon, without pejorative connotation. "Niggur" was evidently similar to the modern use of "dude" or "guy". This passage from Ruxton's Life in the Far West illustrates the word in spoken form—the speaker here referring to himself: "Travler, marm, this niggur's no travler; I ar' a trapper, marm, a mountain-man, wagh!"[6] It was not used as a term exclusively for blacks among mountain men during this period, as Indians, Mexicans, and Frenchmen and Anglos alike could be a "niggur".[7] "The noun slipped back and forth from derogatory to endearing."[8]

TIL even a simple etymology lesson will trigger these deplorables' lawnmowers into the stratosphere.

http://therightstuff.biz/2016/03/29/cuck-is-our-racist/

Ahahha I haven't busted out a quint in awhile but I had too.

Noted real liberal and ****face wil314 used that weak-ass dictionary that pops up at the top of google searches and thought, hot damn, now here's a gotcha, let me get my bold and underlines and italics working up in here.

That googletionary is the same reason these ****faces don't know what 'bigot' means.

lol

Hue is wrong, wil is right.

Lol at Cuck being a psychological semantic weapon.

Yea if you want to stab yourself.

People here are doing a fantastic job of being triggered by it.

You are confusing triggered, whatever that means, with absolute ridicule.

No one with any serious intellectual chops would ever roll with the word cuck, it immediately self identifies anyone using it as a moron.

Cool story bro, think its a while before your laughably bad reasoning starts boring me. I do find your super human hypocrisy slightly tedious tho.

From Radix Journal:

So are wil and Lord whitewashing the racial aspects of the term "cuck" because they are ignorant or because they, like Milo, want to support white nationalists as much as they can while maintaining plausible deniability?