Goading people into arguing and then blaming them for arguing is opposite doing justice socially. We can flowchart much of this business.

Lol. No

Just open your eyes.

Yeah, the set of people called SJWers changes like the wind. There's a whole mysterious SJWer movement we're told. People say they waste their time -and at the same instant- make D.Trump more popular. This just makes the OSJers hoppin' mad.

But still, nobody can tell us who these SJWers happen to be. It remains... well you know, covered in guac.

I gave you an example of one a little while ago.

Remember, the supposedly intelligent university professor behaving like a 3 year old child

Here's one for you ^, right on cue.

I wasnt implying it was an epidemic.

I can link you loads of hate crimes that turned out to be fake. Can also link you examples of SJW movements being racist/facist.

Will link a few examples in this tread tomorrow.

Well, you said

so that seemed like you were denying that race played any role at all.

Then you say:

But if racism exists, then isn't it an advantage not to be a member of the race that is discriminated against? The term privilege is probably not the best descriptor because it causes confusion. What it means is that being white gives one an advantage, all other things being equal. It does not mean that a poor white person is better off than a black millionaire.

Maybe the terminology here is part of the problem. "White advantage" might be the better phrase to use.

"Social justice movements being racist/fascist" is contradictory. They stop becoming social justice movements the second any of that is inclusive or a goal. That point seemed to go over both of your heads.

Excellence is a goal under social justice. Consider the excellent social values available and look for exemplification to see social justice.

You can see social justice people. Social is you and me at least who ever you are.

Don't know about that, but he's certainly tweeted:-

And:--

Besides tweeting fan-worship of well-known less-than-grown-up YouTube misogynist Sargon of Akkad and also retweeting this gem, from a friend apparently:--

Banning conservative speakers in university's is the most obvious example.

A very Orwellian thing to do.

Another reason to hate the SJW movement is they have me sticking up for conservatives.

Denying people to right to speak. Valuing peoples speech over others because of the color of their skin and not the strength of their arguments and segregating people on the colour of their skin a form of fascism doesn't matter what name you give it.

These are good points I will expand upon later.

What conservative speakers have been banned? What "SJW" have the authority to ban them?
Hint: Milo was not banned.

I'd love for you to tell me the difference between Universities canceling the speeches from the females targeted by gamergate harassment because they(read: Milo supporters) phoned in repeated bomb threats and this, though.

Milo has been banned as well as been forced not to speak due to protests. At multiple universitys. In this case he wasnt banned but had to cancel due to violent protests which is almost as bad.

Ben Shapiro has also been banned , both under guise of not wanting to promote hate speech which is ****ing laughable.

Your speaking like I would approve of that happening? That is disgraceful as well obviously.

But do you really need me to explain to you the difference between a few rogue arseholes phoning bomb threats and the actual staff of university s , the people responsible for both setting the sylabis and also actually educating the the next generation of your country controlling what speakers should speak based on their political persuasion?

If these guys were holocaust denyers or actual white supremacists I would understand btw.

Where has Milo been banned from in the USA? I cannot find any citation that supports this. Please, stick to facts.

Generally, his events get canceled because he calls his tour the "dangerous ******" tour, or threatens to out LGBT/illegal students of that university, not his "political persuasion." But, that's like facts and stuff.

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/...o-yiannopoulos

No where in that link does it say Milo has ever been banned from any secondary education facility. Perhaps give your own sources a good read through before posting them?

People assembled, whatever stopped whoever from doing that didn't stop the people who did show up.

I did actually. Are you being deliberately difficult? Ok he wasnt banned he just had his appearances canceled so he couldn't speak. Everything I said still stands.

So some people find him a little offensive and he makes crude jokes. Your educating the next group of people who are going to run our country offending them is hardly grounds to stop him from expressing his view.

The police had to cancel the event as they were concerned for peoples safely.
Some people did assemble good for them, im all for protesting, have at it.

Other people also attacked people beat them unconscious, smashed buildings and sprayed women with pepper spray.

There is a gigantic difference from being banned from a place and having your appearance canceled due to threats/funding issues. You were being intentionally misleading. You should try not to do that.
You think outing people who are not out is a "Crude joke?" It's absolutely ****ing disgusting. Trump wrote legislation for an executive order that would see people be fired/denied basic rights due to being LGBT (it doesnt look like he will sign it), yet you think it's a joke?

I've seen what police can do to peaceful assemblers. No doubt a huge topic to explore.

Dude I wasn't being deliberately being misleading, In my opinion I think being not allowed to speak and express your views is akin to being banned.

WHy the **** else would a speaker want to go a university? DId you think i was implying that they wouldn't let him enroll there if he wanted or something?

Put it this way if I was a speaker and a university said oh dont worry were not banning you just not allowing you to speak I would laugh in their face. The **** else would I go to your university for?

No, they are completely different words that have completely different meanings. Please, look up the word "ban." Harvard wouldn't want me to speak at their University. I am not banned from speaking at Harvard University. How is this difficult?