Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
Jiggs, I never know if you actually believe what you write. How did presenting your historical fiction answer my question?
I mean, like most of my questions to you - it's a pretty simple yes/no on what you believe and yet you won't answer it. Do you even realize its because you hold so many contradictory views?
OK, let's try this again, and perhaps this time you won't continue to obfuscate and act like your gotcha question wasn't answered...
Yes, I believe we have not recovered from the 2008 crash, where growth is STILL half what it used to be for decades. Yes, I believe without unprecedented levels of unsustainable cash injection, we'd be in a full depression. Yes, I believe this new era (with no end in sight) is entirely due to a nosedive in global net energy.
Now, surely you'll maintain the arrogant ***hole act because we haven't had two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth that constitutes the accepted definition of the term "recession" ... But make no mistake about it, the bubble economy has been artificially propped up by the state, and people like you feel that's an innocuous, normal, expected solution as dictated by natural market forces. You know, "yawn,"... that kind of thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
And I love how you always change the goal posts to try and claim victory. Although 7 is still less than a dozen, so even when you do that you're just terribly wrong.
There is no goal post shift, moron. I've referred to the Rimini/Uppsala Protocol (by name or by tenets) OVER a dozen times. It's not my fault you attempted a lazy word search and failed.
You pretended I've never offered my solution. I showed how I have many, many times for years. So **** off. You goofed again.
Tell us more about how you care about the environment, but don't want to accept a definition for what constitutes dirty resources.