Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Lazy welfare queens popping out babies for money Lazy welfare queens popping out babies for money

09-19-2014 , 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Bahbah, it's not your fault that daddy spoon fed you bull**** growing up.

Like sure, ok, MAYBE you could fact check here and there, see what evidence exists IRT how TANF recipients use funding, use Google and see how cost effective drug testing recipients would be, etc. But what's the fun in that? Too much risk. After all, by NOT fact checking you get to maintain your core political beliefs and not come down with a wicked case of the dissonance.
If you google how effective is drug testing recipients you would have to spend hours and hours weeding through bull**** opinion piece that says that 4 months of requiring drug tests can prove if it works or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
No bahbah, your argument was that we should be happy if we got to throw people off of benefits because it saves money for the taxpayer, gosh darn there was just nothing we could do to help the kids of poor parents who smoke some weed, and drug testing not being cost effective was a liberal conspiracy so we have to let that law test out for 20 years.

Unlike you, we can read and retain information.
Example 237 of you claiming I said something I didn't.

BTW, I can say the same thing you just said: drug testing being cost effective was a conservative conspiracy so we have to let that law test out for 20 years. It is amazing on a poker forum that not every single poster doesn't read that article and say lolsamplesize.
09-19-2014 , 05:08 PM
Quote:
No bahbah, your argument was that we should be happy if we got to throw people off of benefits because it saves money for the taxpayer
Quote:
So reimbursing the test cost the state $118k. Being able to refuse benefits to 2.6% of applicants is huge long-term even if we ignore everyone who won't try to sign up because they know they can't pass a drug test. We are also ignoring the benefit we are creating for these people and society by getting people off of drugs.
Quote:
gosh darn there was just nothing we could do to help the kids of poor parents who smoke some weed
Quote:
I wish there was a way to really help those kids, but I don't see one and I sure as hell don't see you proposing one. You, like most liberals, are elite at pointing at problems but are the WOAT and coming up with solutions.
Quote:
and drug testing not being cost effective was a liberal conspiracy so we have to let that law test out for 20 years
Quote:
Just because one liberal person wrote an article saying implementing drug testing increases costs does not mean that implementing drug testing increases costs
Quote:
No, what I am questioning is why they are taking a short sighted look at the test. I want to know the effects of this law after 5, 10 and 20 years.
Don't ever say you weren't shown you are an idiot.

As Kurto said earlier, the reason you are a terrible poster has nothing to do with your racism (well that's to strong, the fact you are an abject racist exacerbates the rest of your terribleness) its the fact that you can't even ****ing remember your own arguments.

Just stick to posting straight racism, you are better at that.
09-19-2014 , 05:12 PM
Does look like your return to posting swept you to a come from behind upset win over Gamblor, so on to the eight worst posters for you. Congrats bahbah! Only a couple of other posters could pull that off, take a minute and appreciate what you have accomplished.
09-19-2014 , 05:54 PM
Shame on all of you for pretending I'm half as terrible as this POS.
09-19-2014 , 06:46 PM
Should give you something to reflect on.
09-19-2014 , 07:52 PM
His ignorant, numb nutted postyling style - while pretty garden variety when it comes to bad posting - is so terrible in every single way. All the boxes related to being a passing poster go unchecked. All of them.
09-19-2014 , 09:11 PM
Should give you something to reflect on.
09-19-2014 , 09:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compellingly Smart
They are long term beneficiaries, the inter-generational ones are the types are the hardest to reform, these people have no experience to work as they have grown up without seeing their parents work, and the cycle continues

i think some good measures to break them off the cycle are:

a) introduction of forced work searching 2-3 times a week [supervised]
b) compulsory drug testing
c) introduction of a card that can only be used at the supermarket
d) training for shopping for cheap, healthy foods and basic cooking training
e) Classes in financial management

Thoughts.
Are they just organic computers with erroneous programming formed by a stereotypical list of lifetime circumstances and the errors are solved by outside intervention?

      
m