Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
June LC thread June LC thread

06-26-2017 , 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnyCrash
Making fun of Wils kid is about as scummy as it gets. Pretending you feel threatened is comical.
Dear oh dear. Do you normally just jump into the middle of something you don't understand and abuse people?

Firstly, you accused me of being a liar, here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnyCrash View Post
You have replaced LG as the biggest lying scumbag piece of **** on the forum.
Congrats?
Where's your evidence?


Secondly, I've never been threatened by wil or anyone else here, so maybe you'd be better served by not jumping to false conclusions.

Thirdly, I take the view that wil puts his kid up here in his avatar like no one else in the whole forum does, to give him the chance to talk frequently about what a great parent he thinks he is (despite advocating punching small children in the face as punishment). He even put a photo up once of her holding a card with something he'd written on it about another poster. To me, that's a pretty scummy use of your own kid, and I don't think joking that she looks weird comes even close to that or to much of his other behaviour here (though it wasn't me who said that anyway).

It's sometimes a good idea to get your facts right first.
06-26-2017 , 01:38 PM
Lol jalfrezi. Do you really not think people can make up their own minds?.

Your behavior is atrocious. You are the biggest scumbag in this forum, hands down. It's your reputation, do what you want. It's hilarious though.
06-26-2017 , 01:49 PM
You're such a standing joke in the whole forum you even get a mention in the Sklansky bet thread lolwil
06-26-2017 , 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Dear oh dear. Do you normally just jump into the middle of something you don't understand and abuse people?

Firstly, you accused me of being a liar, here:



Where's your evidence?


Secondly, I've never been threatened by wil or anyone else here, so maybe you'd be better served by not jumping to false conclusions.

Thirdly, I take the view that wil puts his kid up here in his avatar like no one else in the whole forum does, to give him the chance to talk frequently about what a great parent he thinks he is (despite advocating punching small children in the face as punishment). He even put a photo up once of her holding a card with something he'd written on it about another poster. To me, that's a pretty scummy use of your own kid, and I don't think joking that she looks weird comes even close to that or to much of his other behaviour here (though it wasn't me who said that anyway).

It's sometimes a good idea to get your facts right first.
If you dislike being called a scumbag don't attack little kids and stop twisting peoples words.
06-26-2017 , 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
You're such a standing joke in the whole forum you even get a mention in the Sklansky bet thread lolwil
I'm a person who pays my debts, though. Unlike you. You run around proud of the fact that you're a liar and a deadbeat.
06-26-2017 , 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnyCrash
If you dislike being called a scumbag don't attack little kids and stop twisting peoples words.
So no evidence.
06-26-2017 , 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
The only reason you are here is because Original Position hasn't ended our bet yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I'm a person who pays my debts, though. Unlike you. You run around proud of the fact that you're a liar and a deadbeat.
The bet hasn't ended, but jalfrezi is a liar and a deadbeat who's in debt to you? What?
06-26-2017 , 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I'm a person who pays my debts, though. Unlike you. You run around proud of the fact that you're a liar and a deadbeat.
lolwil

Yeah sure you do. That's why you tried to welch on the LG bet, even claiming victory at one point and unilaterally instigating a timeout that you hope to win the bet through lolwil PoS.

And it's also why people here refuse to bet with you, calling you a welsher. lolwil
06-26-2017 , 03:58 PM
I'm stealing this from a post in ye alpha politics:

Quote:
Kentucky-based Appalachian Mountain Wrestling has graced the world with the presence of “Progressive Liberal” Dan Richards. He definitely isn’t a face....

If you’re in Kentucky and free on Friday, watch Richards against some guy in a sleeveless shirt in a “Crybaby Match,” where the loser “will have to wear a diaper and suck on a bottle.”

http://deadspin.com/the-progressive-...ium=socialflow
I'd like to see a p7 version of this "Crybaby Match" concept :P

*standard disclaimer: this post is not intended to suggest the use of violence, even cartoonish fake TV violence, on any P7 posters past, present, or future, nor their spouses, children, pets, or favored stuffed animals.
06-26-2017 , 04:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
Yeah, I agree that it will probably be fine although obviously we will need to see the implementation of it to be sure.

This is all fairly irrelevant but I will give essentially what is my vision of this forum (and this is all pretty much speaking from a completely selfish standpoint).

The Politics forum is a good forum, but it is essentially an echo chamber. I don't say this in the negative way that many do, I enjoy that forum, it has many good and great posters that make good and great posts. I read it. I occasionally post. The problem in it for me lies in the fact that I do not particularly feel the need to respond to posts I agree with, so I view it more as a place to get current events and interesting opinions on those events but not to contribute too much.

This forum I essentially view as a fun place to argue with and make fun of morons (mostly wil). If it is to differentiate itself from the Politics forum in any way, I think it must, basically, allow what most would consider to be bad posting. This is because the reasons people come here seem to me basically twofold:

1) The posted so badly they were exiled from alpha.
2) They enjoy arguing with the posters in set 1.

The posters in set #1 are simply going to post badly. It is what they do, it is who they are, and there is no hope of that changing. There is little hope of getting through to them with reasoned arguments. They are often going to post racist or offensive things, hopefully not overtly so.

The posters in set #2 have basically come here seeking out the bad posting. If they wanted to argue and discuss with each other, they'd do it in alpha. They (we) either want to make fun of, or practice arguing against, the bad posts.


Basically, my theory of this forum is that it thrives on ****posting. If ****posting is disallowed the forum ceases to have a purpose. My view is that the modding should focus only on stopping the ****tiest of the ****posting, and keeping the ****posting within sitewide rules, and nothing else.

So I guess basically unchained.
haha this seems the most spot on post in this thread. or really the whole forum.
The SJW forum is full of god awful posting. Fantasy narratives by the likes of commies like GBV so unchallenged and the whole lot of you idiots sit there nodding your heads.

Last edited by well named; 06-26-2017 at 05:06 PM. Reason: moved from moderation thread
06-26-2017 , 04:47 PM
Can you provide an example? (Perhaps in it's own thread)
06-26-2017 , 04:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
The SJW forum is full of god awful posting. Fantasy narratives by the likes of commies like GBV so unchallenged and the whole lot of you idiots sit there nodding your heads.
Echo-chambers are like that. How boring it must be to post in a forum day after day where everyone agrees with you.
06-26-2017 , 04:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
The SJW forum is full of god awful posting. Fantasy narratives by the likes of commies like GBV so unchallenged and the whole lot of you idiots sit there nodding your heads.
Very few people (actually only one I can name) agree with him about most things. As usual you're wrong.
06-26-2017 , 04:57 PM
Just search for GBV's posts in one of the terrorism threads, it reads like a parody of the left when unchallenged, but of course in that forum nobody is up for the challenge, instead we have a bunch of nodding automatons over there unless Trump is mentioned, that will wind you guys up!
06-26-2017 , 05:02 PM
Dude you made the claim, I'm not familiar with his posting, if you want your claim to be taken seriously you search for it and post some examples, or otherwise gtfo
06-26-2017 , 05:06 PM
Nah, do your own digging, that comment was just to lol at your claim of 'good posting' in the Politics forum. Lets just say that I strongly disagree.
06-26-2017 , 05:13 PM
You are trying to refute my claim that there are good posts in the Politics forum by providing an example of bad posting in the Politics forum?

Last edited by TiltedDonkey; 06-26-2017 at 05:15 PM. Reason: And you can't even provide the ****ing example, ffs
06-26-2017 , 05:14 PM
Unable to cite, Marn?
06-26-2017 , 05:16 PM
Marn, your post was a god damn failure and you should feel bad.
06-26-2017 , 05:22 PM
Tiltedmoron, you are not worth my time and jalfrezi has read those threads, so he knows what I am talking about.
06-26-2017 , 05:25 PM
Marn can you please make a little effort to be right about even one thing?

I don't like slagging off posters who aren't around to defend themselves but most of GBVs posts were in the UK politics and Brexit threads, and really no one on the left agreed much with him apart from tom. The rest of us had terrible arguments with him. I won't say why that was because you can read it for yourself, but the point is that you've badly misrepresented that forum.
06-26-2017 , 05:27 PM
When bad arguments do not get addressed due to tribalism and groupthink then that = a ****ty forum not worth reading. Good posts will get drowned out by the noise in that environment.

Politics forum is a lost cause. Might make for a good case study though.
06-26-2017 , 05:40 PM
As a microcosm of all that is wrong with the left, the P forum is equally fascinating and disturbing.
06-26-2017 , 05:52 PM
The reason for that is that since you, wil and mongi were banned there haven't been any good right wing posters there. :P
06-26-2017 , 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
Tiltedmoron, you are not worth my time and jalfrezi has read those threads, so he knows what I am talking about.
LOL @ you, you ****ing cretin, you engaged me.

1. I said there are good posters in the politics forum.
2. You tried to refute () this by saying there is a bad poster in the politics forum.
3. I asked for an example of his bad posting.
4. You could not provide it.

I mean, two things:

First, your response to my post was so ****ing stupid that I literally did not even realize it was meant to be a response to my post until you told me. I thought you were just making an unrelated point.

Second, because of point #1, my request for an example was actually a good faith attempt to engage you on the topic. If I had known it was meant to be an argument against "there are good posters on the politics forum" I would've just called you a moron to begin with and been done with it.

      
m