As further demonstration of what I'm talking about, let's look at this post you just wrote.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Not a single person on 2+2 has ever beaten me, lifetime, in a bet in the politics forums.
I know what you're trying to say here since you post it all the time when you need to feel alpha (you're up
net, lifetime, against people you've bet against) but it makes no sense how you worded it. You lost a bet against LG so clearly the claim that "no one has beaten you, lifetime, in a bet" is false. Poor writing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
You and many others have claimed I'm the worst poster and essentially the worst person to have ever graced these boards.
Have I? idk if I've said that before but it's plainly obvious that people like mongidig are worse, so this is misleading at best (if I posted it in the past but it's no longer true) and a straight up lie at worst (if I haven't posted that before).
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
How is it possible a complete idiot moron mouthbreathing racist dickhead like me holds a record like that?
There's a multitude of ways. This being a poker forum, I'm sure you have at least some grasp of how variance works. The only way it's
not possible for you to have a record like that is if you frequently entered into bets where you had literally 0% equity. So, congrats, we know conclusively that most bets you've entered have >0% equity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
None have you have ever beaten me
As with your wording earlier, this is just straight up wrong, so...
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
yet I'm the one who is wrong about everything?
...yes, this happens all the time! You were, in recent examples, wrong about nobody being successful who works 40 hour weeks, and posted an article while debating social mobility that contradicted your own claims and arguments. You're wrong in this very post about your gambling record. You are
very frequently wrong, and it's hilarious that you think having a good record on the rare occasions you've gambled with others somehow changes that or is even a meaningful data point.
Yet another impressive display of your prowess here, wil.