You only appear to troll spank. You have never tried to get to know spank and always cast blame and point fingers only at spank. Nothing personal, but you have been pegged.

You will find self-esteem and dignity is not available to your showing of lack of it in public. The guile and shallowness of your opportunistic posting style is evident. Only a weak character with small understanding behaves like you do towards spank. I pity you. I wish you the best in overcoming your behaviors.

You're a complete ****ing moron. Read back through the thread and see how many times I told you I needed you to explain or clarify your gibberish.

It's not trolling. This whole thread was me having a thousand times more patience for you than anyone else has left.

But hey, you get to add me to the list of posters that think you're illiterate, so there's a victory for you.

Edit:

The irony in you saying this in a thread where someone's actually tried to understand whatever the **** you think you're saying.

I told you twice before I was not responsible for your lack of understanding and was not to blame for it. I see you asked me questions about a problem you claimed I have which I did not and do not have. Review what you have omitted from my posts and find problems I actually have if you want me to relate to your criticism.

Blades, my observations of your cherry picking is quite accurate as is my observation that you are claiming I have a problem. I shoot for accurate observations.

You kept.asserting you were trying to figure something out. I have posted enough information that I am confident contains a high probability of being figure-able.

The real question did you really consider the information before proceeding to keep posting? That is a mystery only you can know the answer too.

Spank, you're not capable of holding this conversation. I understand that now.

You are the one asserting that. So that is your responsibility. I agree to disagree.

Bladesman, I think I've seen you around here so I'm a bit surprised by this, but nevertheless, today you've learnt a lesson that will serve you well in the future: never try to have a serious conversation with spank.

I am a universal champion at winning arguments about myself.

I agree smokey J doesn't really try to have a "conversation" with spank.

Small-minded smear artists like smokey J usual aren't good at conversation.

What a waste of a potentially interesting thread.

Note to self: avoid threads featuring multiple posts by someone who likes referring to himself in the third person

It's a rhetoric device use for a specific purpose.

I agree that ideas about the creation of the universe and how those can be taught is a very interesting topic.

This FFS. We have like 16 threads dedicated to this bull**** and it's straight destroying PUC.

Kerowo and mods, given your status, I expect you to take the high road for the sake of the forum and to disengage. Spank, please, for the love of God, stop responding to others' ad hominems. Please.

So, do you think that science teachers should be able to criticize intelligent design in the classroom? My answer is yes.

Should a class on religions include information on how various religions regard science? My answer is yes.

I'm good on both, without thinking it through too carefully.

The arguments against either easily boil down to sorts of prides and prejudices towards knowledge.

on that other matter forced upon us...

Well, I first read unchained following TheKid's car crash threads in RGT, then stayed for lols in Anarchy. Obviously there's a lot of history with Spank but that's not stuff I've been around for.

I've learned my lesson.

You could read the spank thread and the moderation thread. Lots of people to learn from. There is history of describable behavior among every individual poster here. But, why dwell?

In the future if you cherry pick among ideas in my posts to form a weak argument, I'll tell you and you can change your argument or you decide to assert non-communication- or whatever you want. I certainly don't force you to post, right?

I'm always around for conversation and can argue as well. Cheers!

Who Posted?
Total Posts: 141
User Name Posts
spanktehbadwookie 55
Bladesman87 26

> 1/3rd of the posts

Someone contain the spam, because spank sure as **** can't

Edit

Spank is the top poster in 8 of the 27 threads on the front page, one of which is a sticky with 0 replies, another a new thread with zero replies. So 8/25, or basically 1/3rd of the front page threads.

So? Your foul opinion about spank biases any statistical point you could be making.

How stats are used to promote nonsense and hate by Roonil.

Blades- are you a person of science?

Oh I must have confused you with someone else. Well, basically every conversation of substance in which spank is engaged ends up like this. He used to be straight up intelligible - I was thinking that would be preferable to now since there's less derailing potential if people can't understand him, but he managed it anyway. He was made a mod of this forum twice, and demodded super quickly.

Don't get sucked into his attempt above this post

You are lying by omitting your own behavior.Every time you and your gang of similar disposition form accusations from your foul opinions about spank, you get your behavior highlighted in an honest response from spank.

You literally hurt yourself every time you participate in the smear behavior about spank- as historically it is filled with a bunch if mostly accidental malice and demented behaviors by people who have chosen to target spank and earn a response. You suck people in. Blade's should be looking out for you.

Your criticism of spank has been so cynical and ignorant historically you have literally criticized spank's posts for both being too complex and too simple. You don't even have a straight story to add with your foul opinion.

It must be really confusing for Spank that all the trolls he comes across for some reason hone in on exactly the same criticism.

That is evidence of it's weakness since it shares the weak support of the lack of knowledge you all have about me. Clear as a bell.

Also evidence of herd behavior. However you do have not have anything close to perfect harmony. You Omit everyone else's behavior and equate a whole group of individual's behaviors with out a precise analysis. You are making an appeal to the mob, which helps my criticism of mob behavior rather than helps your support for it.

My responses have addressed both the social group and it's individuals. Look it up.

I quit this thread.

Me too. Until an authority steps in and stops the spank smear campaign we have to predict this will happen as I doubt the regular participants can stop them selves at this point. Look, they are still avoiding the topic completely in preference to spank, while recruiting new people to join in their folly of confirmed bias of gross degradation. That's life.