Explain the stupid.

Stupid is explainable. I can explain how and why something is stupid and I remember who calls things stupid but doesn't like to explain.

You are enabling him to play dumb. He could have wasted no effort deleting the thread and reached this same conclusion.

I never complained when Eliot changed a thread title that I had previously changed. He seemed to know what was going on.

I consider a thread about a political issue getting censored to be a political issue. Minimalism is not stupid.

Free the posting!

Point out to me a post or thread that you would like me to use as an example and I will try to explain it.

You used the word, bring your own meaning. I think you are being stupid now because you are arguing about nothing. While the topic is something else worthy of questioning and open communication.

To be precise- you are showing a lack of observation skills and political concept prioritization by derailing into a stupid Q & A about stupid.

I just think that it would be better to use concrete examples when talking to you rather than trying to discuss abstract ideas.

We can start with Johny's Jared thread. I claim that it was locked due to a non-arbitrary bias against stupidity and not due to moderator animus towards users. Agree or disagree?

See how effective minimalism can be. Free the nipple got a bunch of free publicity for being hidden away like a nipple. Age of communication is here. Please undeleted the thread.

It was a humor thread. What a waste.

Start a new thread on the same topic with a slightly different OP and see what happens.

I already made a perfectly good thread for the topic, complete with a heart icon because I want to free the nipple because I love the nipple.

The principle of the matter, from my view, has become that restoring the thread and implicitly agreeing to act like deleting never happened is the best solution at no one's expense.

You really didn't.

Would you consider undeleting and locking the thread as something we can potentially point and laugh at?

You're biased and act stupid avoiding thinking about minimalism. Face it, you are a stupid censor with a pickled bias.

Please bring your best prudish arguments. If they are like your work meddling around in the moderation thread we will get smart laughs out of it.

I have a solid track record following up with minimalist threads and having them turn out.

I don't make threads frequently, so that thing kerowo invented, that I spam, does not apply.

One thread shouldn't disrupt a forum unless it is against the rules , so the other fictional opinion about me doesn't apply either.

Basic what we have left remaining plausible after the fiction is dispensed with is that kerowo has a bias of personal dislike and an inability to maturely handle this in an impartial role.

Turned in him into a censor and an authoritarian-style leader. It's not to late to choose a different approach.

So it's only spam if you create the thread? How about posting a thousand random gibberish responses monthly during a half year breakdown? What's that called, minimalism?

Ah, frommagio, one of the other pop-in's mimicking some vague opinion of derision.

Please elaborate what you mean by breakdown? You do repeat this same kind of stuff a lot, but what it is made of? What are the indications of a breakdown which are observable and why are they valid?

Obviously if you think your criticism is smart and worthwhile of the moderation thread you can back it up with more than mere repetition and add some substance.

I thought stanky wasn't allowed to thread**** anymore.

Hahahahahaha all these months later and all you still got is variations of the time you kept saying shut up. Does it ever occur to you to take your own advice?

Almost 15% of posts in thread, tells other people to shut up

I called it a "breakdown," but I'm really not 100% sure what to call it. For about half a year, you posted something like 30-50 indecipherable messages daily, seemingly arguing with everybody. What would you call it?

Anyway, you seem to be healthier now, or at least your posts are more normal and English-like. That is good news, and I hope you continue to feel better.

What is the smart basis for your statistical analysis? Any Idiot can post some numbers and miss the point

Your such bad critic keep repeating yourself, go on please proceed. It is fun pointing out exactly why you miss so often.

Consider this is a softball issue. You have a very recent very minimal thread in your name as well. But kerowo doesn't have a stick in his ass about you because he likes your stupid kind of opinionating. You guys have similar bias.

Give us what you consider the endpoints of that half-year period, I'll pick a random three-day span within that period, and we can examine all of spank's posts during that span. I think they are probably more decipherable than you claim.

Looooooool.

OK man, it's totally reasonable for you to keep denigrating the moderators and their performance after you yourself had not just one, but TWO unsuccessful attempts at moderating.

Spank, serious question: Do you think you could do a better job at moderating than the current mods? A simple yes or no is sufficient. Anything else is a blatant question dodge.

You don't answer my criticisms of the moderation, which is a big avoidance.
It's a basic issue of personal bias and incongruent mod decisions. I made mostly consistent mod decisions and can explain each one reasonably, based with strong premise.

Frankly I do not find your question worth answering on your terms because of it's weak premise, which is not a concern of mine. So neither.

Which opinion of mine do you disagree with so hard that this moderation thread spree is your approach? Do you hate free nipples? Southern progressives? People who like to learn and and have fun? People who argue hard? Is there anything worth considering in your criticism than the fact you have an opinion?