Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Hall of Shame Quote Threads The Hall of Shame Quote Threads

06-17-2014 , 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
Just because I support sweat shops doesn't mean I support terrible work conditions.
Fill this bad boy up with quotes you feel should be recorded into the Hall of Shame.
06-17-2014 , 05:38 PM
I shame myself for pluralizing the wrong word in the title.
06-17-2014 , 05:39 PM
There is a cancer on the Presidency.

-John Dean
06-17-2014 , 06:35 PM
The most obvious choice: Gamblor defending the practice of giving Ethopian immigrants birth control without their knowledge or consent.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/41...tbulb-1293804/

Digging himself deeper and deeper:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
I lived a few minutes drive away from an Ethiopian community. You have no idea how little they know of modern society. They would toss garbage out the front door because they've never had non-organic garbage. They would just piss or take a **** everywhere. In the streets, wherever. They have a million kids because they don't know anything about birth control or economics because they just grew or found whatever food they needed and had nothing else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamblor
how do you get informed consent from someone that doesn't understand? Do you demand informed consent from a baby getting chicken pox.

Last edited by MrWookie; 06-20-2014 at 02:35 PM.
06-17-2014 , 06:44 PM
A rare example of original material from him that wasn't plagiarised.
06-21-2014 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerIMO
A rare example of original material from him that wasn't plagiarised.
Now I'm dying to see his original material that was plagiarized.
06-21-2014 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kioshk
There is a cancer on the Presidency.

-John Dean
There certainly was then, yes
06-22-2014 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
Fill this bad boy up with quotes you feel should be recorded into the Hall of Shame.
.
06-22-2014 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrawNone
i think its pretty funny flag waving, right-wing soldier sniffers have vilified two people, Snowden and Berghdal, who undoubtedly enlisted for selfless patriotic reasons rather than just for a job or the opportunity to legally kill people.
Millions of homicidal psychopaths. Kennedy, Eisenhower, probably ole George just in it for the blood lust. ****ing pathetic.
06-22-2014 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrawNone
Hannity gets it. a sliver of hope for America.

thekid, ppl of conviction and passion make you uncomfortable b/ u cant understand source of their certitude. these folks know they're right and they're not afraid to prove it on TV. great Americans like this dont need wikipedia to tell them what to think. their wikipedia is their American gut and their American heart.
Period.
06-22-2014 , 11:41 PM
maybe drawnone is doing some sort of performance art and I have missed the theme.
06-23-2014 , 01:23 AM
Lol DIB you're an idiot.
06-23-2014 , 08:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
maybe drawnone is doing some sort of performance art and I have missed the theme.
is plagiarizing stephen colbert considered performance art?
06-23-2014 , 09:05 AM
Am I J'Makinyoucraaaaazy?
06-23-2014 , 04:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
is plagiarizing stephen colbert considered performance art?
I dunno I am a simple man.
06-24-2014 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Millions of homicidal psychopaths. Kennedy, Eisenhower, probably ole George just in it for the blood lust. ****ing pathetic.
Lou the point was not "every1 enlists for feed their blood-lust." i didn't say that.

ppl enlist for adventure, to gain discipline, for a job, to pay for college and im sure a thousand other reasons. yeah, i do think one of those reasons is the opportunity to kill another human without consequence. that's probably true for a very very small % of those who sign up.

the point i was making is the right-wing "support out troops crowd" picked 2 soldiers to vilify and accuse of being traitors, and the fact is there is a lot of evidence that those 2 "traitors" are part of the group that decided to enlist out of a desire to serve their country.
07-31-2014 , 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
I made the point that we are not talking about engineering, or reverse engineering, but collapse due to either plane impact or explosives. We are talking about destroying something, not engineering something. It's a lot easier to tear something down than build it, and so how that happened in this case is a more general question which appears match a common type of problem in physics.
Just precious in it's cluelessness.
07-31-2014 , 09:59 PM
kerowo do you have the first clue as to how to break something down and show why it is clueless?

I don't think you do. But I think you know enough to know not to try lol. You know you're a clown.

Last edited by Deuces McKracken; 07-31-2014 at 10:10 PM.
07-31-2014 , 10:05 PM
Quote:
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky."
-BC
07-31-2014 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
kerowo do you have the first clue as to how to break something down and show why it is clueless?

I don't think you do. But I think you know enough to know not to try lol. You know you're a clown.
You're right, I don't have a degree in breaking **** down so there is no way I can tell you why you are clueless. Oh, wait, that isn't how things work so I can.

Do you really think that there are two areas of study; building stuff and destroying stuff and they are so orthogonal that experts in Physics and Engineering are incapable of figuring out why something fell down? That is just pathetic.

If you don't think the towers fell down because they were hit by planes or that the surrounding buildings were catastrophically damaged by tons of **** from the towers falling on them then what do you think happened? It's a simple enough question for you. What brought the buildings down?
07-31-2014 , 10:42 PM
Or at least come up with an explanation that is more likely than the official story
08-01-2014 , 03:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
You're right, I don't have a degree in breaking **** down so there is no way I can tell you why you are clueless. Oh, wait, that isn't how things work so I can.

Do you really think that there are two areas of study; building stuff and destroying stuff and they are so orthogonal that experts in Physics and Engineering are incapable of figuring out why something fell down? That is just pathetic.
Where are you getting that from? My argument was for expanding the range of expertise applicable the problem to include physics, instead of limiting it to structural engineering. I was saying that the problem of why the buildings fell is more general than those which only structural engineers can solve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
If you don't think the towers fell down because they were hit by planes or that the surrounding buildings were catastrophically damaged by tons of **** from the towers falling on them then what do you think happened? It's a simple enough question for you. What brought the buildings down?
I don't know. Why is the idea of limits on knowledge such an intellectual blind spot for so many people? We had a window to properly investigate the collapse. The government closed that window as fast as it could, forever. That's it.

Why you and so many others go around believing a explanatory theory exists which doesn't exist is much harder to understand.
08-01-2014 , 05:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASJayhawk
-BC
Quote:
They hate us for our freedoms
- GWB

Quote:
We will be greeted as liberators
- DC
08-01-2014 , 07:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken

I don't know. Why is the idea of limits on knowledge such an intellectual blind spot for so many people? We had a window to properly investigate the collapse. The government closed that window as fast as it could, forever. That's it.

Why you and so many others go around believing a explanatory theory exists which doesn't exist is much harder to understand.
You mean you're surprised that most people watched two planes fly into the towers, burn uncontrollably and then collapse and think that the buildings collapsed because of the two planes flying into them? That surprises you?

What is this "I don't know" bull****? You don't believe the obvious explanation but don't have any idea what could have actually caused the collapse?

Do you think the planes were the cause of the collapse?
08-01-2014 , 05:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
You mean you're surprised that most people watched two planes fly into the towers, burn uncontrollably and then collapse and think that the buildings collapsed because of the two planes flying into them? That surprises you?
I don't think most people would have taken it as a given, if you asked them before 911, that if a plane flew into the the towers it would cause their complete collapse. An investigation here is standard. What we actually got was a compromised investigation which makes no claim to a theory of the complete collapse. Some people accept this, and I wonder why. Don't forget, half of New York believes there was a conspiracy, so be careful with "most people".

Plus one of the buildings completely collapsed without any airplane flying into it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
What is this "I don't know" bull****? You don't believe the obvious explanation but don't have any idea what could have actually caused the collapse?

Do you think the planes were the cause of the collapse?
"I don't know" is essentially the same answer that NIST gives wrt the twin towers. You believe in NIST right? even if you don't actually no what they say lol

      
m