Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Gender pay gap Gender pay gap

08-08-2017 , 12:57 PM
They can just go to separate but equal cake counters!

But yeah there was blood split in the fight of treating people equally. Mostly liberal blood though.
08-08-2017 , 01:10 PM
Neuroticism? Please, proceed, Governors.
08-08-2017 , 01:18 PM
I'm loving the idea that Google is a Marxist enterprise.
08-08-2017 , 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Jiggy and wil gonna be using Ask Jeeves for the rest of the week.
haha. love this post.
08-08-2017 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladesman87
I'm loving the idea that Google is a Marxist enterprise.
where did you get that idea and why do you love it?
08-08-2017 , 06:28 PM
Quote:
the lol predictable sjw/marxist chain of events

-google has disparity in geder outcomes
-sjw's discover said disparity and start warrioring
-lawsuit
-hire professional SJW to get the company in line with SJW agenda
-fire anyone who disagrees with the sjw denial of basic biology with out even providing credible counter evidence
So Google aren't a Marxist enterprise, they just hire people to implement Marxist policies?
08-08-2017 , 07:15 PM
Nope, no communists here....oh wait.

08-08-2017 , 07:21 PM
They should fire and blackball them for their thoughts like right wingers did in the not so distent past.
08-08-2017 , 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
They should fire and blackball them or their thoughts like right wingers did in the not so distent past.
No, they should just hire 1 right winger for every left winger. Exact equality.

And of course, every time a Left winger opens their mouth, the Right wingers should scream how offended they are by those pussy Left wingers.
08-08-2017 , 07:26 PM
Funny that's what they proposed for some southern schools. Cucks can't compete I guess.
08-08-2017 , 07:39 PM
And also lol at the right not screening and whining about the left. Good one.
08-08-2017 , 07:40 PM
let me tell a joke

the gender wage gap exists
08-09-2017 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
-juank appears
And Lord Have Mercy he has his work cut out for him if he wants to regain his spot in the Stupid Poster Power Rankings.
08-09-2017 , 12:34 AM
Spoiler:
batair is a silent assassin


Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
The goverment should step in and not allow google to run their own business, unless they are selling cake.
08-09-2017 , 12:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
SJW/marxist logic

-disparity in outcomes = oppression and victimization

-oppression and victims are created by the patriarchy, white privilege, sexism, racism, classicism, and teh phobes

- if you deny their assumption then you are somehow now the racist, sexist, phobe they blame for said inequality

- if you don't agree with them then they need to come after you, your job, career, and personal life

its somehow not possible for the SJW's to just think you are wrong or disagree with you. its the movement of anger, bitterness, and resentment. instead of going after his job or villianizing him, how about you provide a counter argument with actual info? his sentiment that the disparity in outcomes is explained through biology isn't radical hate-speech. men and women are actually different. to deny this makes you the radical idiot that needs "re-education". if you have a disagreement over the details of gender differences, go ahead. but be civil about it


the lol predictable sjw/marxist chain of events

-google has disparity in geder outcomes
-sjw's discover said disparity and start warrioring
-lawsuit
-hire professional SJW to get the company in line with SJW agenda
-fire anyone who disagrees with the sjw denial of basic biology with out even providing credible counter evidence

wan valdeeznutz,


Serious question: You look at all the parties involved and you say that the dude mashing out 10page manifestos, whining about bull**** he doesn't come close to understanding, is somehow NOT the angry, bitter, and resentful person who CAN'T simply just think somebody else is wrong or disagree and leave it at that?

That's what you're saying?
08-09-2017 , 04:17 AM
Google needs to get on that HuffPost diversity time, it's 2017 ffs.



Spoiler:
They look so happy in their little echo chamber
08-09-2017 , 05:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
wan valdeeznutz,


Serious question: You look at all the parties involved and you say that the dude mashing out 10page manifestos, whining about bull**** he doesn't come close to understanding, is somehow NOT the angry, bitter, and resentful person who CAN'T simply just think somebody else is wrong or disagree and leave it at that?

That's what you're saying?
i was going to suggest you haven't even read the content, because who cares about facts when you have a tribe to side with and someone to hate on in show of your virtue but then i realized its also possible that you're just slow. its like you don't even realize that substituting reaction dot gif with articulating any sort of thought or argument x1000 is a total embarrassment. quoting someone and bolding a line with a caption like "zomg can you believe this?" is essentially the same thing. combine that with stalking wil and we have your entire presence.

here is a quote straight from the "hate-rant"


Quote:
I’m not saying that all men differ from all women in the following ways or that these differences are “just.” I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. Many of these differences are small and there’s significant overlap between men and women, so you can’t say anything about an individual given these population level distributions.

I hope it’s clear that I’m not saying that diversity is bad, that Google or society is 100% fair, that we shouldn’t try to correct for existing biases, or that minorities have the same experience of those in the majority. My larger point is that we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism).
the guy hit the nail on the head and they proved him right by hiring a pro SJW to fire people like him. the only type of diversity they like are the types of diversity that shouldn't matter (race, gender, sexual orientation). they are totally intolerant of the important diversity (ideas, thought, pov). the person advocating people be treated as individuals instead of a member of a group is the bigot being fired while the people constantly and obsessively identifying and judging people based on their race or gender are the ones claiming virtue and tolerance.... and any deviation from their super compassionate and virtuous pov gets a mouth frothing reaction full of spite and rage. hmm
08-09-2017 , 06:19 AM
The funny thing is his entire argument is exactly the argument we've had here. He could be a 2+2er.

His firing is a complete joke and anyone on the left who doesn't stop and worry about a situation like this is a fool.
08-09-2017 , 06:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
i was going to suggest you haven't even read the content, because who cares about facts when you have a tribe to side with and someone to hate on in show of your virtue but then i realized its also possible that you're just slow. its like you don't even realize that substituting reaction dot gif with articulating any sort of thought or argument x1000 is a total embarrassment. quoting someone and bolding a line with a caption like "zomg can you believe this?" is essentially the same thing. combine that with stalking wil and we have your entire presence.

here is a quote straight from the "hate-rant"




the guy hit the nail on the head and they proved him right by hiring a pro SJW to fire people like him. the only type of diversity they like are the types of diversity that shouldn't matter (race, gender, sexual orientation). they are totally intolerant of the important diversity (ideas, thought, pov). the person advocating people be treated as individuals instead of a member of a group is the bigot being fired while the people constantly and obsessively identifying and judging people based on their race or gender are the ones claiming virtue and tolerance.... and any deviation from their super compassionate and virtuous pov gets a mouth frothing reaction full of spite and rage. hmm

It was a yes/no question you stupid motherf**ker.


Spoiler:
I mean, I didn't read that but, like, wow at it not starting with Y or N.
08-09-2017 , 06:50 AM
juan,


What the f**k is wrong with you?


Now, before you say I'm not "articulating any sort of thought or argument" let me spell it out: I am articulating a thought. The thought is that there's something seriously ****ing wrong with you.
08-09-2017 , 08:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
wan valdeeznutz,





Serious question: You look at all the parties involved and you say that the dude mashing out 10page manifestos, whining about bull**** he doesn't come close to understanding, is somehow NOT the angry, bitter, and resentful person who CAN'T simply just think somebody else is wrong or disagree and leave it at that?



That's what you're saying?


Maybe people who use words like 'leftist and SJW' stereotypically are signaling a deficiency of emotional experience/intelligence?
08-09-2017 , 08:23 AM
Leftism might actually be a virus. It jumps from people to other people. It's contagious.

****ing scary.
08-09-2017 , 08:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Leftism might actually be a virus. It jumps from people to other people. It's contagious.

****ing scary.


It's okay. The monsters under the bed are only leftists in the imagination.
08-09-2017 , 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Leftism might actually be a virus. It jumps from people to other people. It's contagious.

****ing scary.
It's intimidated into other people. You WILL comply.

Google's new slogan: "You're right, we're evil. **** it."
08-09-2017 , 09:27 AM
I think Jiggy lacks the courage to stereotype any women to their faces. But maybe he would send a company memo around?

      
m