As I recall, the reason I refused to answer the whole NBA question and encouraged juan to make the argument himself was because he was dancing around it but refusing to actually make the connections he was so obviously insinuating.
I assume that's why he's always accused you of misrepresentation when you say he actually made the argument that hormonal differences explain differences in social outcomes. The game is to hint at the argument (on the basis of things like the racial composition of the NBA) without actually making it. The insinuation is obvious, but he tries to maintain some kind of weird plausible deniability, although it's not really that plausible. The best example of this strategy is probably
in this post.
I suppose it's less reasonable to ask him to actually make his argument now since it would violate the PC rule :P