This free speech angle is confusing. Are there waves of Milo supporters saying that he doesn't have the right to say what he said? He clearly does.

Cpac had the right to disinvite him, other organizations have the right to have him speak, people have the right to protest any of those decisions. Nothing has changed on the free speech front.

Yeah, no. Wil wasn't joking at all. He quoted a far-right religious fundamentalist hate-site in all seriousness to 'prove' that all gay men are as promiscuous as those who engaged in the San Francisco bathhouse culture in the 1970s. He insisted that this is an immutable law of nature by claiming that all his gay friends have had at least 1000 partners each and arguing that because gay men aren't held back by picky temperamental females they are all apocalyptically mindbendingly promiscuous at all times and in all places and AIDS hasn't made any difference to that at all so his pet 1978 study isn't in the least out of date.

He also claimed that paedophilia is totally OK and paedophilia rocks because the kids are just asking for it and when he was 14 he wanted sex with anyone up to age 50 and that was totally his fault so paedophiles are never to blame for their actions. According to wil, paedophilia rocks and is totally OK, because the kids are asking for it.

Depends entirely on the contract.

Lol. The irony is the ageist label has followed wil ever since.

Ps Milo resigned

People can't understand how voter ID laws are intended to suppress votes no matter how clearly you lay it all out for them. People who desperately need Obamacare can't understand how voting for Trump might jeopardize that. Poor people rail against inheritance tax - not fair!

I will never expect those same people to understand the nuances of free speech.

If someone starts a gofundme for Mayo I will kick in. Sorry that you had to experience that Mayo

I kinda wanted Milo to stay on and be a stain on Breitbart going forward. This and the new Trump playing nicey nicey (stepping over his bar now that he's set it an inch high) makes me nervous. Like in that article about Zweig's memoir - how the West gushed all over Hitler every time he mentioned the word peace in a speech.

If a work hasn't been completed then how does the publishing company know if Milo publishes "the book" with someone else? He could just send them pages of gibberish and that's the book.

But then I'd be shocked if Milo's contract didn't give him full rights upon a cancellation. In fact, I assume that would be the default and the publishers would have to explicitly state that they retained the rights in the contract.

And so the role reversal takes shape.

lol wil still not banned and talking about pedophilia

Unbelievable

It's not pedophilia because he's talking from the POV of his 14-year-old horny self. Get over it snowflake.

If chez can't bring himself to disciplining him properly, wil should have his undertitle changed to something pertinent to this episode.

Isn't it possible that trying to convince yourself that abuse that happened to you as a child is no big deal sort of a classic coping mechanism? Some people don't want to think of themselves as victims or want to face repressed trauma and such.

I mean hell I don't know if ya'll watch the tv show It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia but there's a whole running gag in the show about how as a child Dennis was raped by some creepy old librarian lady and yet he tries to remember it as him conquering an older woman.

Regardless, Milo's comments to me come across way more as him doing mental gymnastics to deal with his own abuse rather than somehow actually excusing pedo behavior.

Chez is happy wil was incredibly homophobic and is in favour of pedastry. We've given him like 20 chances to warn will and gotten a shrug.

Cotton, the point of IASIP us that the cast are terrible people that should have been in jail ala the ending of Seinfeld 10 seasons ago. Not the best comparison to make! If this were the first time he'd done something like this you might have a point. But he has a nearly decade long history of doxxing minors, being on 7 and 8chan extensively, which are basically just sites for child pornography...

Awww darn!!! Does that mean we arent gonna see..

Markksman
Suzzer99
Heehaww
ogallalabobv
EADGBE
Paul D
samsonh
TimmayB
einbert
dereds
Mayo
Lord_Crispen
Victor
Deuces McKracken
Namath12
aoFrantic
Jbrochu
Jules22
Lawnmower Man
SuperUberBob
prana
thefinchster22

...until the next "Gotcha, You Dirty Alt-Rights" world stopping event?

Do you even see your psycho you psychos?

Jesus Mary & Joseph, even our resident PU Whiney Wench Wackjob kerolol backed off early recognizing the psycho

LOL @ SJW psycho nerds


Its a crying shame that Cotton Hills post is going to fall on def ears

Truly pathetic this world I live

Yeah, there are a lot of dumb republicans. But swap out the word republican with any other mainstream ideology and the sentence will be just as true. There are just a lot of dumb people.

Frankly, I don't think many people on either side understand the nuances of free speech but that doesn't mean you get to attack them for things they haven't said or done yet.

No. What he said was still gross.

That is how child abuse is handed down the generations. The person mentally justifies and normalises (and fetishises) what was done to them, and then uses it as further justification for doing the same to others in turn. That is the motor. That is how it works.

Wrong. It's always been about free speech.

Pissing off liberals is just an added bonus.

I will say or do whatever is necessary for you guys to send me money.

It's what Milo would have wanted.

Lol @ what the main forum thinks. The majority of them are colossal idiots.

So, if CPAC is always about free speech, why did they 'deplatform' M.Yiannopoulos?

Then why aren't you upset he can't speak at cpac and his book deal got canceled?

Will, you think you're a genius but used a radical Christian site and a dating blog owned by a 23 year old as your "sources." You have tripled down on endorsing pedastry and relationships between children and adults as old as 60. You think a relationship between a 13 year old and a 60 year old is ok because it apparently would have made you happy as a child. This is ****ed up.

I'm an adult, yes. I do not post racist or sexist or homophobic rhetoric. I speak honestly about topics, if you choose to take them as racist or sexist, it's on you. You don't get to dictate my opinions. Sorry, that's how life works.

I'm frequently NOT shown that I'm wrong. In fact, I'm right about almost every single topic I speak about - because I speak about topics I am mostly familiar with. Again, I invite you to have a long, deep conversation with your non-existent gay male friends about what we spoke about. Most will agree with me, not you. I guarantee it.

I've explicitly explained why I posted what I did, it was to discredit what you posted. It's idiocy to think an OKCUPID online poll is a good way to derive how a small group of people act. It's not scientific. It's the same sort of idiocy that made the "25% of women are sexually assaulted at college" a thing. It's not true, it's not scientific. It's complete idiocy, and if people who actually mattered, like scientists and psychologists actually used data in that manner they'd be laughed at.

Again, I addressed this, specifically. There is no really good data when it comes to this, because there is a political agenda behind it. Make no mistake, that agenda MEANS SOMETHING.

I don't use data to support my world view. I look at data for what it is and see past the crap in it. You and your people bend over backwards to make everything fit into your world view, not mine. I take data for what it is, I don't need to manipulate it.

I think both of you should PM LetsGambool and ask him what the scoreboard is. I don't want to brag, but I'm in the positive column. Go ahead, PM him.

And remember : you two brought this subject up, not me.

If there was anything Wil has ever said that every person alive would respond with "no ****" it's this sentence.

Wil, first you thought the OKCupid study was just on the LGBT community. Next, in your most recent post you refer to it as a "poll." How do you keep being so uninformed about something you're so vehemently against? It was a study of an entire userbase, of over 3 million users. The data is incredibly useful. Please, show the slightest actual facts that anyone has "manipulated" any data. Please. You just made that claim. Back it the **** up.