Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year !!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year

02-21-2017 , 11:17 PM
Quote:
This is the internet though, so whatever, but in the real world there are real consequences.
The internet is the real world. When people get doxxed and death threats because of an online political movement, it has very real effects on peoples' lives. People have been attacked, they've lost their jobs, they've had to move. You haven't done your research here.
02-21-2017 , 11:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
More info on all that background stuff:
https://medium.com/@DaleBeran/4chan-...8cb#.fmj33ueqf
This is obviously a good article, but glosses over the terrible treatment women/minorities received there before gamergate. Like it does touch on the repeated urges to get people to kill themselves, but there was a lot of other bad stuff too. He was at the forefront.
02-21-2017 , 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Clinton won among women by 54 percent to 42 percent.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news...us-presidency/
This is not what I asked. I asked what % did he get. How could 42% of women have voted for someone who said he could grab them by the vagina?

Think about that for a second, and get back to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Uh wil, milo literally gained prominence from gamergate. Might want to do your research again.

BTW I saw where you got your "facts" from. The source is literally worse than elitedaily or a radical Christian site. You are so, so bad at Google.
I know where Milo gained prominence. I'm the one who explained it to other people. Jesus.

I don't care where you think I got my facts from. I have mutliple sources and they all line up. I live in a city that has a thriving and vibrant gay community. I know what I'm talking about. You do not.

You continue to make yourself look like a fool. You aren't right, dude, as much as you'd like to be. It's really really easy, as it's a question that comes up on many gay websites with forums on them. Go join one and check out their threads and what they say about it. Go do the research yourself and realize that you sound like a moron.
02-21-2017 , 11:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
This is obviously a good article, but glosses over the terrible treatment women/minorities received there before gamergate. Like it does touch on the repeated urges to get people to kill themselves, but there was a lot of other bad stuff too. He was at the forefront.
That's the thing. His cruelty has been so prolific and his ONLY claim to fame. How has wil not heard of it?
02-21-2017 , 11:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
Yeah I'm 98% positive wil mentioned numerous times he doesn't know anything about Milo and hasn't followed, but w/e, that's boring.

What's interesting is how he keeps repeating that people don't know anything about him. He's overshared so much over the years any halfway clever person could find his real identity. I'm not encouraging this, just illustrating the extent he's shared.

I've actually refrained from mentioning personal info about him to not look like a creep and to not give that info to people with limited exposure to wil, but, ****, he's shared a lotttttt and I have a good memory.
The mistake is expecting Wil to ever hit any kind of consistency aside from his self aggrandising.

Back in spank thread, I pointed this out: Wil doesn't make arguments or have lasting opinions, he has clusters of disorganised thoughts that he expresses at any given moment with no regard for what came before or what will follow.

That's how he can simultaneously disavow his own citation about the number of gay male partners whilst also claiming it to be deadly accurate. They aren't thoughts that ever converge in his mind for him to spot the problem.
02-21-2017 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
This is not what I asked. I asked what % did he get. How could 42% of women have voted for someone who said he could grab them by the vagina?
I don't know. Why don't you tell me?
02-21-2017 , 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Wil, you genuinely have no knowledge about somethingawful/4chan, aka where this all started. Perhaps to avoid making another 20 terrible posts, you could do you research now?

Wil, you don't know what "outing" means. If you are in fact correct, you probably should tell your wife about this.
I don't frequent 4chan and I have no idea what somethingawful is and I don't wish to. I read about it, I wasn't there when it happened. In fact I learned about gamergate while arguing with someone on 2+2 about feminism and how stupid it was.

I'm unsure why I typed "outing". I know it means to expose someone as closeted gay. I had to go back and read if I actually typed that, as I must have not been thinking when I did. I think the context of what I typed would give you a clue what I meant, but you are correct I used the term incorrectly
02-21-2017 , 11:24 PM
For the people who have been following Wil making a fool of himself today, the link he found that made himself so sure that gay men have thousands of partners....is an anonymous message board thread, on a forum much, much smaller than 2p2.

He didn't elect to share this because it's ****ing embarrassing, obviously.
02-21-2017 , 11:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466

I'm unsure why I typed "outing". I know it means to expose someone as closeted gay. I had to go back and read if I actually typed that, as I must have not been thinking when I did. I think the context of what I typed would give you a clue what I meant, but you are correct I used the term incorrectly
Because when you get riled up about a subject, you post without thinking or editing. You don't proofread, you don't double check, you just seek to answer quickly.
02-21-2017 , 11:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
That's the thing. His cruelty has been so prolific and his ONLY claim to fame. How has wil not heard of it?
This is simply not true. Again, how do you build a career on being cruel? Give me the formula, the path. Do I just start being mean to people on the Internet and Twitter and I'll be on Bill Maher next week?

Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
I don't know. Why don't you tell me?
Well, something doesn't add up. I mean, you linked to an article (or tweet or whatever) that was a denouncement of Trump and the way he treats women. I mean, you think he's a sexual predator and a sexist, right? All voters heard what he said, didn't they?

So, how did he receive 42% of the female vote? Your story just doesn't line up. Something ain't right. Please, explain this discrepancy.
02-21-2017 , 11:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
This is simply not true. Again, how do you build a career on being cruel? Give me the formula, the path. Do I just start being mean to people on the Internet and Twitter and I'll be on Bill Maher next week?



.
Name one prolific thing Milo has done we would not deem cruel?
02-21-2017 , 11:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
I don't know. Why don't you tell me?
It's not my job to explain to you how the world works

or

God, you're so stupid. How do you even tie your shoes in the morning???

or

You have no idea what you're talking about. I'm done talking to brainless idiots like you.



Choose your own adventure!
02-21-2017 , 11:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
For the people who have been following Wil making a fool of himself today, the link he found that made himself so sure that gay men have thousands of partners....is an anonymous message board thread, on a forum much, much smaller than 2p2.

He didn't elect to share this because it's ****ing embarrassing, obviously.
I stand by my statements and I'd invite you to bring gay men into this thread to discuss it. There are many gay message boards out there. Go read them.

It is no question, without a doubt, a total slam dunk that I am correct on this topic. Go read them yourself. It's literally spelled out to you on those boards.

Report back with results.
02-21-2017 , 11:31 PM
Truth is indeed stranger than fiction, I don't know what else I can say wil. What facts are you disputing?
02-21-2017 , 11:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
No, I don't think so. He's done. No one will book him now and I think he's 100% never speaking on a college campus again.

His career is toast. He may possibly be able to sell books but that's it. I don't see how he could possibly survive now.

He went from being on Bill Maher a few days ago to contemplating suicide today. He did it to himself.
Meh, he still has millions of supporters many of them think he's innocent and this is a total smear campaign. Im sure he's fine financially, it'll be up to him if he wants to continue. I'd bet money that he does.
02-21-2017 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Name one prolific thing Milo has done we would not deem cruel?
What do you mean by prolific? He's been invited on many talk shows and news shows to share his views in a wide range of topics. He's invited to college campuses to do the same. He has reasonable and logical stances on many issues. Plus, he's pretty funny.

If you think he stands up and talks for 45 minutes and just makes fun of people the entire time, you are mistaken.
02-21-2017 , 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
I stand by my statements and I'd invite you to bring gay men into this thread to discuss it. There are many gay message boards out there. Go read them.

It is no question, without a doubt, a total slam dunk that I am correct on this topic. Go read them yourself. It's literally spelled out to you on those boards.

Report back with results.
Now, both 2outs and I posted extensive studies about this. You visited a forum and got anecdotes from a few anonymous posters. Wonder which is a better source!?!

This is akin to saying it's possible to make $100/hr playing 1/2 because you saw a thread about it on 2p2. Of course the math doesn't add up, but you read anonymous people online saying otherwise.
02-21-2017 , 11:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shifty86
Meh, he still has millions of supporters many of them think he's innocent and this is a total smear campaign. Im sure he's fine financially, it'll be up to him if he wants to continue. I'd bet money that he does.
Under what metric would you say he has "millions" of supporters? Even if you combined his peak youtube/twitter followers/subscribers, they didn't reach 1 million combined. This was also before most people knew he was a pederast.
02-21-2017 , 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Truth is indeed stranger than fiction, I don't know what else I can say wil. What facts are you disputing?
You said Trump was enabled. I mean, he said what he said yet still received support from women. Why would such a large % of women support him? It's not an insignificant number.

How did he get 42% of the female vote?
02-21-2017 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
You said Trump was enabled. I mean, he said what he said yet still received support from women. Why would such a large % of women support him? It's not an insignificant number.

How did he get 42% of the female vote?
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert View Post
I don't know. Why don't you tell me?
.
02-21-2017 , 11:43 PM
wil, do you think that maybe your one or two gay friends are outliers? I mean, they're your friends.


Jokes aside, you admit you haven't been around the internet watching these things spawn from the start and you're not familiar with the cultures in which these sorts of ideas spring up. So, why then do you feel as though you're even mildly qualified to take part in a conversation about these topics, let alone have the steadfast end all be all answers already figured out?
02-21-2017 , 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Now, both 2outs and I posted extensive studies about this. You visited a forum and got anecdotes from a few anonymous posters. Wonder which is a better source!?!
Without a doubt my source is better. Now, we would have to put it in some sort of perspective, but it's an obvious example of my claims not being some strange, unbelievably wild description. The users of those sites are telling you, completely honestly, of their sexual history, in very explicit detail. They aren't lying, there is no motive to lie.

You posted no extensive study to anything. Your links are garbage, total trash.

Do you notice the lack of people supporting you here? It's not because everyone is busy doing something else, you realize that, right? Enough people despise me here that if you were actually even kinda correct this thread would be flooded with people pointing that out. You are not correct. The silence is deafening.

It's because they know I'm right too, dickhead. They just don't come out and say it.
02-21-2017 , 11:47 PM
You're wrong on literally everything, wil.
02-21-2017 , 11:48 PM
Quote:
you're not familiar with the cultures in which these sorts of ideas spring up.
I was going to edit in the following bit, but I was afraid with the speed of the thread and replies that you may not see it, so here's an additional thought:

You say that the alt-right sprung up from the "SWJ" stuff, but I've watched these nooks on the internet (4chan, SA, a few others) become a safe haven for absolutely disgusting racism and white supremacy since the dawn of the internet. You were too busy not being a loser and making lots of money, so you wouldn't have been around to see it. No one is faulting you for that, but the history of things isn't something people are making up. It's there. There's documented evidence all around to find out how things really happen. You don't have to take the word of your friends who read about a thing on Facebook or even the word of us trying to enlighten you. You can go look for yourself. I know you won't, and that's fine, but you have to at least admit that maybe you don't know what you're talking about and you shouldn't blindly defend your views that aren't really based on much else than gut feelings.
02-21-2017 , 11:51 PM
Wil,

more anecdotes! Great! I have multiple gay friends that have not slept with anywhere near 1000 partners. In fact, I've slept with more people than they have. Is this whole gays sleep with a thousand people thing bitterness over not getting laid a lot? Because that kind of what it seems.

      
m