yes plz

My Mom's cable sucks

These dudes' heads are literally gonna explode when they hear about crazy NOI mythology that many NOIers don't even believe.


Yakub (sometimes spelled Yacub or Yaqub) is a central figure in a myth of the Nation of Islam (NOI). According to the story, Yakub was a black scientist who lived "6,600 years ago" and began the creation of the white race to be a "race of devils". He is said to have done this through a form of selective breeding referred to as "grafting", while living on the island of Patmos.

The Nation of Islam theology claims that Yakub is the biblical Jacob. Mainstream Sunni and Shia Muslims do not have this belief, or anything similar to it. The story has caused disputes within the NOI during its history. Under its current leader Louis Farrakhan, the NOI continues to assert that the story of Yakub is true, stating that modern science is consistent with it.

So it seems our very own Honorary Aryan and Real Live Boy wil31459 is still confused about Honorary Aryanism.


Honorary Aryan (German: Ehrenarier) is a term from Nazi Germany. It was a status granted by the Nazi Bureau of Race Research, or by other Nazi members, to certain individuals and groups of people—who were not generally considered to be biologically part of the Aryan race—which certified them as being honorarily part of the Aryan race. The prevalent explanation as to why the status of "honorary Aryan" was bestowed by the Nazis upon other non-Nordic—or even less exclusively, non-Indo-Iranian/European—peoples, is that the services of those peoples were deemed valuable to the German economy or war effort,[1] or simply for other purely political reasons.

Is this serious? The comments on YouTube and Yahoo.com are utter filth. What does that prove?

I don't believe a single thing that is reported from the left anymore. The left lies to further their worldview. For so long it used to be the right lied and you'd have to fact check them and the leftists were usually correct. Now it's worse on the left. Way worse. Again, you will not get a single person on this site agree that the statement that Obama made during the state of the Union address about the wage gap was correct. No one. We all know that stat is loltastic, yet he had no problem repeating it multiple times publicly.

So yeah, claiming Breitbart is racist is something I'll have to check on my own. And from what I've read about Steve Bannon he's not a racist, just as I don't believe Trump is a racist.

LMAO, Wil going to bat for Breitbart shows a keen sense of situational awareness. What a tool.

Wut? The people at Twitter can do whatever they want with their service. My point is I don't look to them as a guide for figuring out who is a good person and who isn't.

You and me have a much bigger problem than this. Disregarding the pissing match we have, our overall positions are more worrisome. We both identify being on the same side. We are both in the same type of demographic. We both share a similar educational background. Yet, we disagree on everything.

That is a serious problem. One of us is, in general, is "more correct" than the other. I can honestly admit when I'm wrong and I've been wrong countless times in my life. I can only go by my own metrics that would make me believe I am "more correct" than you are.

It troubles me that we are so similar and so far apart in our beliefs. There is a slight possibility that I'm an idiot, but I'd bet my life savings that you are the one who is consistently wrong.

Report back soon.

But not too soon.

What the hell is he doing in the first 30 seconds of this interview?



MK-ultra or meth ya think?

Lol at the claims of Steve bannon being a racist is the from the articles pulled up by a Google search. Total leftist nonsense, as usual. If he's a racist by those standards, everyone is a racist.

You people are absurd.

Edit : the article bringing the charge of racism is the headline that contained "renegade jew", which was used to describe Bill Kristol, who is in fact Jewish. There's just a slight problem, the person who wrote it, David horowitz, is also a jew.

The article that brought the misogyny charge is one written by milo. Again, lol.

The lefts idiocy knows no shame. Amazing.

wil, the fact that it was written by a Jew is not proof that it's not anti-semitic.

Please provide any evidence that Breitbart is racist outside of the Bill Kristol article.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...P=share_btn_tw

We can go on and on.


Also, wil,
LOL what are you talking about, your political views are straight from central casting for a trailer park paranoid racist. There's no ****ing mystery here, kerowo is a normal human being, you're a right wing nut job who bases his worldview around AM radio and chain emails.

Is this like how Noam Chomsky is described as a "self-hating jew" by other Jewish people? Is it also like a black man using the N-word towards other black men? Racist, right?

The dude who wrote it is Jewish. He wrote it to be provacative, and he holds that privilege to use that type of criticism.

I'm Asian and I've heard other Asians use words like "chink" to describe our people. As much as it annoyed me, I said nothing about the way they used that word. They are part of our group and if that's a word they want to use then so be it. It would annoy me much more if someone outside our group told us what we could and couldn't use as far as language goes.

Again, you people are ridiculous.

Called it.

If you think kerowo is a normal human being I have to question your intelligence. Fly, you are a warped nut job of a person. This is just the internet, no big deal, but in real life, in the real world, you are not the norm at all.

I forgot the black guy thing though. It's definitely not possible to be racist whilst also fetishizing that race.

This link is loltastic. The article being criticized may be inaccurate, I have no idea. That doesn't prove anything.

But please, you say you can "go on and on", so do so. Provide me with proof Breitbart is racist or promotes racism. It must be easy, so do it.

What google searches did you try?
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-dru...-lets-find-out
http://heavy.com/news/2016/11/steve-...e-nationalism/

And why are you discounting the Bill Kristol article? How many racist things does this guy have to do before you'll call him a racist?

Lol. Remember when Wil linked to Breitbart and then, out of embarrassment, denied that he'd ever read Breitbart, and then later on started defending Breitbart?

Again, idiocy. I read that exact link multiple times. Steve bannon describes his view as being nationalistic. He happens to be white. He does not consider himself a "white supremacist". I agree.

I don't know much about David horowitz and I don't care. The only thing I do care about is that he's a jew and he criticized another jew and that's the article being used as the example of racism. The internal politics of a group have nothing to do with me. Just as Dr. Dre has used the n-word 650,000 times in his life, I balk at calling him racist against blacks.

You are a ****ing idiot.

Is this the gay Milo, LGBTQ person of the year thread??

And wtf is the Q? Like where did that come from? Why does that string of letters keep getting longer?