Quote:
Originally Posted by bernie
It's an article, not a study.
There are links in the article to studies that may answer some of that for you.
That said, articles usually cherry pick what they want and misconstrue studies all the time.
b
ikes is 100% right in that post. It's an alarmist, fear mongering article based almost entirely on an alarmist, fear mongering meta study. If you go out looking for potential safety concerns, you will find them in anything and everything. Don't even get me started on the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide.
A responsible study of ecigs without an agenda - you know, the sort of thing that could actually be used to intelligently guide public health policy - would evaluate the relative safety in comparison to smoking, and the successful quit rate (also along with relative safety, Hai Chantix!) in comparison to other methods.
In absolutely every single category, ecigs are >>>>>>> better than anything other than quitting cold turkey. There are hundreds of millions of people around the world who can't seem to quit cold turkey. Based on pretty consistent data from developed western countries, conventional anti-smoking campaigns started running into diminishing returns about ten years ago. There is no way to get smoking rates into the single digits without having some sort of alternative available, and it's pretty goddamn irresponsible for health officials to be constantly trying to undermine the best one out there with junk science and scare tactics.
Last edited by zikzak; 08-02-2014 at 10:41 AM.
Reason: heh, oops