Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Duke Freshman Defends Being a Porn Star Duke Freshman Defends Being a Porn Star

02-28-2014 , 04:44 PM
liberal slut shaming itt
02-28-2014 , 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
I'm fairly certain this was not her intent, but this girl is going to make loads (pun intended) from all the publicity surrounding this. I've seen people posting links to her videos on multiple websites and I'm sure she will be in relatively high demand for the next few months at least.
I don't think this kind of publiclity is really that valuable a concept in porn. She's got a lousy face and a meh (by porn standards) body. She's not writing herself much of a meal ticket.
02-28-2014 , 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
I don't think this kind of publiclity is really that valuable a concept in porn. She's got a lousy face and a meh (by porn standards) body. She's not writing herself much of a meal ticket.
Sidney Leathers, the Octomom, etc. would all like to have a word with you.
02-28-2014 , 06:39 PM
Having your name come up in connection with porn in a google search is unbelievably -EV for job hunting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
Sidney Leathers, the Octomom, etc. would all like to have a word with you.
Isn't the octomom broke, tho? Besides, she's got novelty value for being the Octomom. This chick is just another mediocre porn chick.
02-28-2014 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
Sidney Leathers, the Octomom, etc. would all like to have a word with you.
That's the novelty of somebody who wasn't a porn star doing porn, and they likely didn't make that much off it anyway.

There's really nothing notable about an already established porn star who can talk about their profession like a non-idiot. Asia Carerra was doing that over a decade ago.
02-28-2014 , 09:48 PM
Eh, at least she's well known. People who might otherwise just watch random videos are a little more likely to seek her out by name, just to see what the fuss is about.
03-01-2014 , 08:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
Sidney Leathers, the Octomom, etc. would all like to have a word with you.
leathers and octomom are nothing to write home about, but I would rather bang any of them before this belle Knox character. Her face is beat nasty, kinda looks like a dude, and she has absolutely no body. The only + about her is that she isn't fat but that's hardly porn "star" material
03-01-2014 , 10:39 AM
and her elbows are so POINTY
03-01-2014 , 11:11 AM
03-01-2014 , 11:20 AM
Since this is a debate about porn stars and **** I'll just leave this name here: Angelica(x-art). No need to thank me...

Last edited by Bandz; 03-01-2014 at 11:29 AM.
03-01-2014 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKingofDiamonds
leathers and octomom are nothing to write home about, but I would rather bang any of them before this belle Knox character. Her face is beat nasty, kinda looks like a dude, and she has absolutely no body. The only + about her is that she isn't fat but that's hardly porn "star" material
wtf
03-01-2014 , 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKingofDiamonds
leathers and octomom are nothing to write home about, but I would rather bang any of them before this belle Knox character. Her face is beat nasty, kinda looks like a dude, and she has absolutely no body. The only + about her is that she isn't fat but that's hardly porn "star" material
his point was you don't have to actually be that hot to make money in porn, genius.
03-01-2014 , 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by airwave16
his point was you don't have to actually be that hot to make money in porn, genius.
I got that. My point was that octo and leathers etc are "not fine" or "not the best" but belle Knox is "f'king hideous." The others are still several notches above this skinny dude-looking Duke student and it is easy to fathom them making money in porn due to variance in men's taste.

Saying 6/10's can make money in porn and gain popularity is a valid point. But this ugly dude, check that, this "empowered" girl, is at best a 2/10. Honestly looks like a tranny and I can't think of anybody who would find her attractive
03-01-2014 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKingofDiamonds
Honestly looks like a tranny and I can't think of anybody who would find her attractive
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmakinmecrzy
... and she's pretty hot -
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmakinmecrzy
I am a big fan of her body type though so I'm biased probably.


03-01-2014 , 06:23 PM
Lol gtfo any of you would sleep with her in a heartbeat.
03-02-2014 , 04:29 PM
I find it very hard to believe that any girl at Duke is hot enough to be in porn.
03-02-2014 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCollins
I find it very hard to believe that any girl at Duke is hot enough to be in porn.
She isn't but she is anyway
03-02-2014 , 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
liberal slut shaming itt
can you point out where, or is this another in your long line of "guess what I'm talking about because I refuse to be direct since I like the attention"?

If you're really going to school for anything you're going to have to learn how to fully form a thought at some point and communicate it to other human beings.
03-03-2014 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidyMat

If you look at the elbows and the unusual facial features, it's clear that this "woman" is actually an alien sent to infiltrate the porn industry as part of their ongoing attempts to establish mind control over humanity. What better medium than porn? The Duke thing is entirely a cover.

Nice legs and ass though.
03-03-2014 , 01:13 PM
I love this threads devolved (evolved?) into purely her attractiveness
03-03-2014 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JudgeHoldem
I love this threads devolved (evolved?) into purely her(his?) lack of attractiveness
Fyp
03-03-2014 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandz
Since this is a debate about porn stars and **** I'll just leave this name here: Angelica(x-art). No need to thank me...
X-Art ****ing sucks. **** soft-assed lighting, ****ty background music having, slow paced arts porn. Yeah, the girls are pretty, but they're boring as ****.
03-03-2014 , 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roonil Wazlib
can you point out where, or is this another in your long line of "guess what I'm talking about because I refuse to be direct since I like the attention"?

If you're really going to school for anything you're going to have to learn how to fully form a thought at some point and communicate it to other human beings.
Didn't you know? Ikes justifies his objectification of women by claiming the moral high ground: Sex positive feminism! This "disclosure" on his part of being a sex positive feminist had me loling more than anything ever has in this forum.
03-08-2014 , 11:24 PM
Ugh. She isn't someone to admire or look up to. Sex is something to be shared with someone(s) who are special to you - reducing it to a pure transaction is kind of gross.
03-09-2014 , 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JudgeHoldem
I love this threads devolved (evolved?) into purely her attractiveness
She wants to be looked at. She wants to simulate exploitation.

Who is to know for sure if embracing simulation exploitation for an individual is not liberating from the pain of actually having expiriences of exploitation? That individual sure does know.

Who is know that the unexploited individual might get a unique thrill from simulated exploitation? That individual sure knows.

One thing is for sure I know, I do enjoy looking at a woman who wants to be looked at, not just in a sexual sense either.

Really I think a lot of the poo pooing ITT is little more that projecting personal preference and acting offended.

Sex is many kinds of good. Despite all the oddly teenage drama for an adult forum, we should be smart to grasp the concept that just because it looks gross to you doesn't mean it looks gross to me.

      
m